{"id":2538,"date":"2023-05-23T11:56:29","date_gmt":"2023-05-23T15:56:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/resources.newhouse.syr.edu\/awards\/?post_type=newhouse_award&#038;p=2538"},"modified":"2024-04-02T10:48:07","modified_gmt":"2024-04-02T14:48:07","slug":"mirror-awards-2024","status":"publish","type":"newhouse_award","link":"https:\/\/resources.newhouse.syr.edu\/awards\/awards-submission\/mirror-awards-2024\/","title":{"rendered":"Mirror Awards 2024"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"template":"","meta":{"award_name":"Mirror Awards 2024","award_organizer":["3"],"award_year":["10"],"award_administrator":["16"],"award_organizer_email":"mirrorawards@syr.edu","award_form":["1460"],"start_date":"1699246740000","end_date":"1708059540000","submission_end_date":"1708077600000","submission_reply_template":["219"],"submission_notification_template":["219"],"entry_category_key":"Nomination Category","entry_filters":["Author\u2019s First Name","Publication Name","Author\u2019s Last Name","Entry Title"],"preliminary_judging_pools":6,"judging_preview_fields":["Nomination Category","Entry Title","Author\u2019s First Name","Publication Name","Author\u2019s Last Name"],"judging_full_fields":["Nomination Category","Comments","Entry Title","Author\u2019s First Name","Paywall Username","Entry Url 1","Entry Url 2","Entry Url 3","Publication Name","Author\u2019s Last Name","entry is series","Paywall Password","Entry File 1","Entry File 2","Entry File 3"],"judges_emails":["rcoope01@syr.edu","nicole.brown1@ufl.edu","pbbrady1@gmail.com","yerinkim32@gmail.com","jrosman@syr.edu","kkobland@syr.edu","mgscotto@gmail.com","denise@denisevalenti.com","pgfreedman@aol.com","cmlieble@syr.edu","ejgrode@syr.edu","omneya.ashanab@nbcuni.com","BarthS@CBSNews.com","vilasboas.eric@gmail.com","jmpedde@gmail.com","kristenc23@gmail.com","blaylibrary@zandileblay.com","cindy.perman@gmail.com","mprussel@syr.edu","molly.simms@gmail.com","rsgutter@syr.edu","hnbrown@syr.edu","mlcraig@syr.edu","sldancy@syr.edu","noeliasophiadelacruz@gmail.com","pdhosken@gmail.com","gjmunno@syr.edu","chandran@gigafact.org","rachel@ByRachelChang.com","contessabrewer@aol.com","nmibrown@syr.edu","nicholasjdesantis@gmail.com","jnglass@syr.edu","cdhedges@syr.edu","aricha13@syr.edu","sue@washingtonindependentproductions.com","marcus.solis@abc.com","bjsheeha@syr.edu","aforesto@popsugar.com","bplogiurato@gmail.com","bwgorham@syr.edu","apbauman24@gmail.com","kecolema@syr.edu","emarti48@syr.edu","fionalgibb@gmail.com","aegallag@syr.edu","csbrody@syr.edu","williamfleitch@yahoo.com","kalux@syr.edu","rshields37@gmail.com","taylormichelepps@gmail.com","horose@syr.edu","kevin.w.sajdak@gmail.com","djspiegel@gmail.com","wasim.ahmad@gmail.com"],"final_judges_emails":["jkkaplan@syr.edu","andrew.edgecliffe-johnson@ft.com","rthompso@syr.edu","carlson.margaret@gmail.com","hub.brown@ufl.edu","Dorothy.Bland@unt.edu","jkkaplan@syr.edu","Merrillbrown02@hotmail.com","hpolskin@gmail.com","maryromano556@gmail.com","dadamssimmons@gmail.com","mchessher@mail.smu.edu","dmrubin@syr.edu","andyabrahams86@gmail.com","dorian@teemingmedia.com","tbreton@cox.net","jmaxrobins@gmail.com","bstelter@gmail.com","rcoope01@syr.edu","rcoope01@syr.edu","rcoope01@syr.edu","algri100@syr.edu","jkkaplan@syr.edu","andrew.edgecliffe-johnson@ft.com","rthompso@syr.edu","carlson.margaret@gmail.com","hub.brown@ufl.edu","Dorothy.Bland@unt.edu","jkkaplan@syr.edu","Merrillbrown02@hotmail.com","hpolskin@gmail.com","maryromano556@gmail.com","dadamssimmons@gmail.com","mchessher@mail.smu.edu","dmrubin@syr.edu","andyabrahams86@gmail.com","dorian@teemingmedia.com","tbreton@cox.net","jmaxrobins@gmail.com","bstelter@gmail.com","Merrillbrown02@hotmail.com","Merrillbrown02@hotmail.com","hub.brown@ufl.edu","hub.brown@ufl.edu"],"judging_criteria":[{"label":"Excellence of craft:","description":"What is the overall quality of the writing and newsgathering that goes into each piece? This includes careful attention to sourcing.","scale":5},{"label":"Appropriateness for the intended audience:","description":"Does the author use language and examples that will make sense to his or her audience? It is expected, for example, that articles published for a trade audience will be somewhat more technical in tone than those for consumer magazines.","scale":5},{"label":"Framing of the issue: ","description":"Does the author use the story to provide a broader perspective on the media and its role in society.","scale":5}],"final_judging_criteria":[{"label":"Overall Score ","description":"","scale":5}],"vote_submission_template":["984"],"judging":[],"final_judging":[],"mirror_judging":{"special_category_1":{"judges":["bjsheeha@syr.edu","aforesto@popsugar.com","bwgorham@syr.edu","apbauman24@gmail.com","kecolema@syr.edu","emarti48@syr.edu","fionalgibb@gmail.com"],"aforesto@popsugar.com":["3584","3493","3616","3522","3552","3433","3641"],"bjsheeha@syr.edu":["3641","3639","3630","3530","3552","3584","3586","3537"],"bplogiurato@gmail.com":[],"bwgorham@syr.edu":["3586","3433","3628","3495","3493","3353","3616"],"apbauman24@gmail.com":["3552","3616","3597","3537","3641","3530","3493","3429"],"kecolema@syr.edu":["3628","3582","3522","3597","3537","3429","3639","3630"],"emarti48@syr.edu":["3495","3429","3639","3586","3597","3584","3582","3353"],"fionalgibb@gmail.com":["3353","3630","3582","3530","3433","3628","3522","3495"]},"special_category_2":{"judges":["wasim.ahmad@gmail.com","rcoope01@syr.edu","contessabrewer@aol.com","nmibrown@syr.edu","nicholasjdesantis@gmail.com","jnglass@syr.edu","cdhedges@syr.edu","aricha13@syr.edu","sue@washingtonindependentproductions.com","marcus.solis@abc.com"],"rcoope01@syr.edu":["2588"],"wasim.ahmad@gmail.com":["3698","3643","3319","3435","3365","3355","3717","3357","3289","3711","3710","3645","3367"],"contessabrewer@aol.com":["3534","3506","3361","3359","3289","3319","3444","3435","3712","3536","3410","3711","3532"],"nmibrown@syr.edu":["3717","3536","3444","3428","3711","3506","3499","3367","3359","3559","3661","3601","3592"],"nicholasjdesantis@gmail.com":["3559","3499","3712","3645","3595","3367","2840","3588","3534","3363","3355","3361"],"jnglass@syr.edu":["3559","3712","3643","3532","3361","3649","3534","3319","3435","3428","2840","3682"],"cdhedges@syr.edu":["3710","3649","3592","3499","3410","3601","3590","3453","3369","3698","3595","3444"],"aricha13@syr.edu":["3698","3682","3661","3649","3595","3363","3717","3588","3506","3365","3289","3369"],"sue@washingtonindependentproductions.com":["3661","3601","3590","3588","3453","3369","3428","3365","2840","3682","3359","3357"],"marcus.solis@abc.com":["3532","3363","3357","3710","3645","3592","3536","3410","3355","3643","3590","3453"]},"single":{"judges":["ejgrode@syr.edu","omneya.ashanab@nbcuni.com","BarthS@CBSNews.com","vilasboas.eric@gmail.com","jmpedde@gmail.com","kristenc23@gmail.com","blaylibrary@zandileblay.com","cindy.perman@gmail.com","mprussel@syr.edu","molly.simms@gmail.com","yerinkim32@gmail.com","cmlieble@syr.edu","bplogiurato@gmail.com","rsgutter@syr.edu"],"ejgrode@syr.edu":["3632","3613","3562","3323","2706","3680","3634","3576","3509","3651","3637","3331"],"omneya.ashanab@nbcuni.com":["3665","3479","2642","3622","3465","3457","2648","2644","3713","3520","3509","3491"],"BarthS@CBSNews.com":["3665","3431","3333","3331","3323","2683","2646","2642","3624","3572","3315","2706"],"vilasboas.eric@gmail.com":["3673","2683","3337","3315","2753","3489","3335","3325","3321","3680","3647","3637"],"jmpedde@gmail.com":["3659","3651","3647","3634","3622","3520","3473","3422","3325","2679","3379","2646"],"kristenc23@gmail.com":["3680","3624","3457","3325","2858","3613","3317","3315","3402","3321","2788","2648"],"blaylibrary@zandileblay.com":["3465","3422","2704","3491","2788","2706","3457","3335","3333","2753","2668","3509"],"cindy.perman@gmail.com":["3335","3333","3331","3402","2753","2668","3613","3489","3713","3479","2681","2642"],"mprussel@syr.edu":["3526","3491","3489","2683","3700","3673","3659","3562","3473","3379","3337","3323"],"rsgutter@syr.edu":[],"molly.simms@gmail.com":["2679","2668","2644","3713","3647","3624","3422","3337","3634","3576","3562","3431"],"yerinkim32@gmail.com":["3473","3431","3317","2648","3632","3479","3379","2858","3673","3665","3526","2704"],"cmlieble@syr.edu":["3572","3700","3402","3520","3321","3651","3637","3526","2704","2681","3632","2858"],"bplogiurato@gmail.com":["3576","2788","2681","2646","3572","2679","3700","3659","3622","3465","3317","2644"]},"profile":{"judges":["aegallag@syr.edu","csbrody@syr.edu","williamfleitch@yahoo.com","kalux@syr.edu","rshields37@gmail.com","taylormichelepps@gmail.com","horose@syr.edu","kevin.w.sajdak@gmail.com","djspiegel@gmail.com"],"aegallag@syr.edu":["3504","3471","2831","3408","3620","3487","3485","3437","3405","3394","3692","3564","3618","3497"],"csbrody@syr.edu":["3580","3475","3463","3377","3564","3497","3420","3477","3471","3459","2838","2640","3500","3487"],"williamfleitch@yahoo.com":["3477","3420","2640","3688","3502","3463","3347","3715","3620","3573","3487","3485","2831","3564"],"kalux@syr.edu":[],"rshields37@gmail.com":["3307","2654","3349","2831","3580","3618","3481","3475","3692","3347","3694","3715","3704","3688"],"taylormichelepps@gmail.com":["3690","3573","3459","3715","3481","3477","3471","2838","3688","3502","3463","3349","3692","3437"],"kevin.w.sajdak@gmail.com":["3408","3481","2654","3620","3502","3500","3497","3690","3459","3424","3377","3704","3694","3307"],"horose@syr.edu":["3349","3420","3347","3504","3500","3307","2654","2640","3690","3408","3424","3405","3394"],"djspiegel@gmail.com":["3694","3485","3424","3504","3405","3394","2838","3704","3618","3573","3475","3580","3377","3437"]},"commentary":{"judges":["rsgutter@syr.edu","hnbrown@syr.edu","mlcraig@syr.edu","sldancy@syr.edu","noeliasophiadelacruz@gmail.com","pdhosken@gmail.com","gjmunno@syr.edu","chandran@gigafact.org","rachel@ByRachelChang.com"],"rsgutter@syr.edu":["3686","3675","3566","3341","3303","2828","3696","3575","3546","3544","3455","3301","3483"],"hnbrown@syr.edu":["3669","3446","3301","3006","3706","3343","3305","3675","3653","2828","2670","3341"],"mlcraig@syr.edu":["3721","3679","3555","3548","3546","3510","3575","3574","3404","3345","3605","3303"],"sldancy@syr.edu":["3483","3441","3404","3686","3669","3455","3392","3341","3574","3566","3555","3452","3345"],"noeliasophiadelacruz@gmail.com":["3696","3574","3455","3452","3392","3305","3675","3006","3721","3679","3516","3446","3653"],"pdhosken@gmail.com":["3544","3343","2670","3721","3605","3566","3546","3540","3483","3452","3706","3339","3305"],"gjmunno@syr.edu":["3702","3679","3516","3510","3507","3446","3441","3339","2670","3669","3540","3404","3343"],"chandran@gigafact.org":["3706","3540","3339","3696","3548","3301","2828","3702","3507","3441","3006","3686"],"rachel@ByRachelChang.com":["3702","3605","3575","3516","3507","3345","3653","3555","3544","3303","3548","3510","3392"]},"higgins":{"judges":["nicole.brown1@ufl.edu","pbbrady1@gmail.com","jrosman@syr.edu","kkobland@syr.edu","mgscotto@gmail.com","denise@denisevalenti.com","pgfreedman@aol.com"],"rsgutter@syr.edu":[],"hnbrown@syr.edu":[],"mlcraig@syr.edu":[],"sldancy@syr.edu":[],"noeliasophiadelacruz@gmail.com":[],"pdhosken@gmail.com":[],"gjmunno@syr.edu":[],"chandran@gigafact.org":[],"rachel@ByRachelChang.com":[],"nicole.brown1@ufl.edu":["3723","3667","3657","3655","3615","3609","3570","3542","3469","3448","3445","3416","3396"],"pbbrady1@gmail.com":["3723","3667","3657","3655","3615","3609","3570","3542","3469","3448","3445","3416","3396"],"yerinkim32@gmail.com":[],"jrosman@syr.edu":["3723","3667","3657","3655","3615","3609","3570","3542","3469","3448","3445","3416","3396"],"kkobland@syr.edu":["3723","3667","3657","3655","3615","3609","3570","3542","3469","3448","3445","3416","3396"],"mgscotto@gmail.com":["3723","3667","3657","3655","3615","3609","3570","3542","3469","3448","3445","3416","3396"],"denise@denisevalenti.com":["3723","3667","3657","3655","3615","3609","3570","3542","3469","3448","3445","3416","3396"],"pgfreedman@aol.com":["3723","3667","3657","3655","3615","3609","3570","3542","3469","3448","3445","3416","3396"],"cmlieble@syr.edu":[]}},"mirror_judging_final":{"special_category_1_final":{"judges":["jkkaplan@syr.edu","Merrillbrown02@hotmail.com","hpolskin@gmail.com","maryromano556@gmail.com","dadamssimmons@gmail.com","hub.brown@ufl.edu","mchessher@mail.smu.edu"],"jkkaplan@syr.edu":["3537","3429","3597"],"Merrillbrown02@hotmail.com":["3537","3429","3597"],"hpolskin@gmail.com":["3537","3429","3597"],"maryromano556@gmail.com":["3537","3429","3597"],"dadamssimmons@gmail.com":["3537","3429","3597"],"mchessher@mail.smu.edu":["3537","3429","3597"],"hub.brown@ufl.edu":["3537","3429","3597"]},"special_category_2_final":{"judges":["dmrubin@syr.edu","andyabrahams86@gmail.com","dorian@teemingmedia.com","tbreton@cox.net","jmaxrobins@gmail.com","bstelter@gmail.com"],"dmrubin@syr.edu":["3601","3444","2840"],"andyabrahams86@gmail.com":["3601","3444","2840"],"dorian@teemingmedia.com":["3601","3444","2840"],"tbreton@cox.net":["3601","3444","2840"],"jmaxrobins@gmail.com":["3601","3444","2840"],"bstelter@gmail.com":["3601","3444","2840"]},"single_final":{"judges":["jkkaplan@syr.edu","Merrillbrown02@hotmail.com","hpolskin@gmail.com","maryromano556@gmail.com","dadamssimmons@gmail.com","hub.brown@ufl.edu","mchessher@mail.smu.edu"],"jkkaplan@syr.edu":["3491","3624","2704","2753"],"Merrillbrown02@hotmail.com":["3491","3624","2704","2753"],"hpolskin@gmail.com":["3491","3624","2704","2753"],"maryromano556@gmail.com":["3491","3624","2704","2753"],"dadamssimmons@gmail.com":["3491","3624","2704","2753"],"mchessher@mail.smu.edu":["3491","3624","2704","2753"],"hub.brown@ufl.edu":["3491","3624","2704","2753"]},"profile_final":{"judges":["jkkaplan@syr.edu","andrew.edgecliffe-johnson@ft.com","rthompso@syr.edu","carlson.margaret@gmail.com","hub.brown@ufl.edu","Merrillbrown02@hotmail.com","Dorothy.Bland@unt.edu"],"jkkaplan@syr.edu":["3564","3307","3408","3377"],"andrew.edgecliffe-johnson@ft.com":["3564","3307","3408","3377"],"rthompso@syr.edu":["3564","3307","3408","3377"],"carlson.margaret@gmail.com":["3564","3307","3408","3377"],"hub.brown@ufl.edu":["3564","3307","3408","3377"],"Dorothy.Bland@unt.edu":["3564","3307","3408","3377"],"Merrillbrown02@hotmail.com":["3564","3307","3408","3377"]},"commentary_final":{"judges":["jkkaplan@syr.edu","andrew.edgecliffe-johnson@ft.com","rthompso@syr.edu","carlson.margaret@gmail.com","hub.brown@ufl.edu","Merrillbrown02@hotmail.com","Dorothy.Bland@unt.edu"],"jkkaplan@syr.edu":["3706","3441","3339","3404"],"andrew.edgecliffe-johnson@ft.com":["3706","3441","3339","3404"],"rthompso@syr.edu":["3706","3441","3339","3404"],"carlson.margaret@gmail.com":["3706","3441","3339","3404"],"hub.brown@ufl.edu":["3706","3441","3339","3404"],"Dorothy.Bland@unt.edu":["3706","3441","3339","3404"],"Merrillbrown02@hotmail.com":["3706","3441","3339","3404"]},"higgins_final":{"judges":["dmrubin@syr.edu","andyabrahams86@gmail.com","dorian@teemingmedia.com","tbreton@cox.net","jmaxrobins@gmail.com","bstelter@gmail.com"],"andyabrahams86@gmail.com":["3723","3609","3667","3469"],"dmrubin@syr.edu":["3723","3609","3667","3469"],"dorian@teemingmedia.com":["3723","3609","3667","3469"],"tbreton@cox.net":["3723","3609","3667","3469"],"jmaxrobins@gmail.com":["3723","3609","3667","3469"],"bstelter@gmail.com":["3723","3609","3667","3469"]}},"preliminary_voting":{"single":{"ejgrode@syr.edu":{"2706":{"comments":"This covered a ton of ground without feeling redundant or meandering. And it took the time to point out some of the pitfalls inherent in these fellowships while contextualizing the environment(s) in which they are cropping up. Good mix of sourcing. Strong all around. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3323":{"comments":"Sourcing amounts to a pair of emailed statements. Nothing wrong with the piece, but nothing remotely groundbreaking or insightful. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3331":{"comments":"It's a Q&A with fairly perfunctory questions. Very little writerly craft (which can still be present even in a Q&A), and Murthy doesn't say more than he would have to a handful of questioners at a press conference. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3509":{"comments":"Some of her arguments are WAY overstated: The fact that the left-leaning New Republic came out for the war was seen as way out of step even then, and as I recall, Remnick's \"Making the Case\" was a conscious attempt to represent the other side of much of the rest of the discourse. There is more than a kernel of truth in her conclusions, and the narrative is slickly packaged, but I think there is also a fair amount of cherry-picking going on here. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3562":{"comments":"Very, very strong from beginning to end. Terrific sense of history, clear-eyed breakdown of what has changed and (crucially) the different ways we can think about that change, wide depth\/breadth of sources: This is a terrific piece of journalism. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3576":{"comments":"Strong storytelling, lots of seemingly well-placed sources, and dishy as all hell. My only quibble: To what end? Do we really learn that much about the media landscape, beyond that Zaslav is pragmatic to the point of being mercenary? That's why I have my \"Framing of the issue\" score so far below the others.","scores":{"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":2,"Excellence of craft:":5}},"3613":{"comments":"I just wish the writing was a bit stronger on this, as it takes an interesting new topic and really works to explore it from all sides. Well sourced and conceptualized, but it still kind of plods along.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3632":{"comments":"Covered a lot of intriguing ground, including the context of past cases and the shift that moves EG's case to \"hostage status\" from the U.S. government's perspective. I selfishly wanted to know a bit more about EG himself and his work, but this does a very nice job.  ","scores":{"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4,"Excellence of craft:":4}},"3634":{"comments":"Leaving aside the fact of how poorly this take has aged (not necessarily the author's fault, but not *not* his fault), the tone of the piece (\"proud disregard for facts,\" etc.) lowers the ceiling a bit on this piece, which takes well-covered ground and finds some new angles.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3637":{"comments":"Fascinating topic that I didn't know tons about. I'm not sure the pivot from Hannity to hyperlocal is as smooth as it could be, though -- this feels like two good articles mashed into one. Still, hard to grumble about two good articles. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3651":{"comments":"Yikes, there are a lot of numbers and acronyms in here! I learned a bunch, and I know this is par for the course for Variety readers, but this piece presupposes a fair amount of tech\/biz savvy on our part. That's the only reason I shaved a point off \"Excellence of craft.\" But job well done for what I gather the assignment was.","scores":{"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5,"Excellence of craft:":4}},"3680":{"comments":"It can be so hard to tie up loose ends on a messy story like this, especially when the two main players won't talk. But a little more context on government intervention would be helpful in understanding just how rare\/grievous the raid was -- or at least could plausibly have been construed as being.","scores":{"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4,"Excellence of craft:":4}},"status":"submit"},"blaylibrary@zandileblay.com":{"2668":{"comments":"RUBRIC 1 - EXCELLENCE OF CRAFT\nSCORE: 4\nCOMMENT:\nGreat writing. Great flow. So readable for a long and well researched article. And yet - it did suffer near the end from simply repeating the premise of the piece\/the problem with late night over and over again. It started out solid, but faltered on the journey to the end paragraph. \n\nRUBRIC 2 - APPROPRIATENESS FOR INTENDED AUDIENCE \nSCORE: 5\nCOMMENT:\nEntertainment? Television? Hollywood? The politics of it all? Nothing more Variety than this! Also appreciated how it spoke to new gen viewers (those under 26) while addressing a topic\/shows\/legacies that the older crew can appreciate. \n\nRUBRIC 3 - FRAMING OF THE ISSUE \nSCORE: 3\nCOMMENT:\nFramed it well. Gave lots of context. But missed an opportunity in terms of framing by not extrapolating more around the shifting habits of viewership and the fracturing impact of social media. \n","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"2704":{"comments":"\nRUBRIC 1 - EXCELLENCE OF CRAFT\nSCORE: 5\nCOMMENT: THIS WAS SO GOOD!!!!   So good! So good! So good! So good! So good! Did I mention? SO GOOD! This is a story I have been living in real time - and it was a privilege to see it covered in print. The story selection , the approach, the reportage, the research, the writing - EVERYTHING HERE: was excellence of craft. \n\nRUBRIC 2 - APPROPRIATENESS FOR INTENDED AUDIENCE \nSCORE: 5\nCOMMENT: Absolutely. This whole piece is such a quintessential Nieman piece, experience and truth. Very appropriate. Very lovely. \n\nRUBRIC 3 - FRAMING OF THE ISSUE \nSCORE: 5 \nCOMMENT: So well framed and dissected and reported and written. Bar for bar -  this was all about media and the undertold story of how it is aging and regenerating. Such a treat to read.\n","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"2706":{"comments":"\nRUBRIC 1 - EXCELLENCE OF CRAFT\nSCORE: 2\nCOMMENT: This is a tired topic. And the writer did very little to bring energy to it. These diversity programs are not new - I myself am a beneficiary. From programs established over 20 years ago. Some historical perspective would have been nice and stopped the constant reframing like the industry is just waking to the problem. This lacked luster.\n\n\nRUBRIC 2 - APPROPRIATENESS FOR INTENDED AUDIENCE \nSCORE: 5\nCOMMENT: Very.\n\nRUBRIC 3 - FRAMING OF THE ISSUE \nSCORE: 2\nCOMMENT: This is a hot topic and has been for some time. There was so much opportunity to add more context of strides made by the industry historically. Also where are more white male voices? They are largely part of the solution in as much as they are assigned the problem. Would love a nuanced perspective there. So yes. The picture is big - but the frame is weak. \n","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"2753":{"comments":"\nRUBRIC 1 - EXCELLENCE OF CRAFT\nSCORE: 5\nCOMMENT: This was so incredibly good. Such a longgggg article - but it never lagged. From research to (at times cheeky) tone - Thiesen stayed strong and consistent. At some points her research got so overwhelming that the piece felt a little gossipy and felt invasive - but she smoothed this over with a lot of context and compassion. Ultimately this was also a reflection of the copious amounts of reporting she clearly did. This was such a good read. \n\n\nRUBRIC 2 - APPROPRIATENESS FOR INTENDED AUDIENCE \nSCORE: 5\nCOMMENT:  Yes. Very much so appropriate for the Defector - and quiet frankly appropriate for any publications audience. This was great journalism. Full stop.\n\nRUBRIC 3 - FRAMING OF THE ISSUE \nSCORE: 5\nCOMMENT: This was the style of story that acknowledges a larger issue through a singular example\/story. This story was entirely about Autostraddle - and an almost biblical style retelling of their genesis and revelation. But in being so specific it tells the larger story of media and many sites: the change in tide continues. I really loved this approach and the depth and breadth of writing and reporting here. Another treat!\n","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"2788":{"comments":"\nRUBRIC 1 - EXCELLENCE OF CRAFT\nSCORE: 0\nCOMMENT: This is not journalism in any form to me. There was no story, no weaving of words. The video is disjoined and not edited in storytelling form. There was no craft - just presented research.\n\nRUBRIC 2 - APPROPRIATENESS FOR INTENDED AUDIENCE \nSCORE: 3\nCOMMENT: This is valid information for any audience - but again not a lay one as as far as I\u2019m concerned there was no narrative constructed for the benefit of the audience. \n\nRUBRIC 3 - FRAMING OF THE ISSUE \nSCORE: 0\nCOMMENT: This lacked all framing. \n","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":0,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":0}},"3333":{"comments":"\nRUBRIC 1 - EXCELLENCE OF CRAFT\nSCORE:  2\nCOMMENT: Another very weak article. It started strong - with powerful story selection and title and ended limp with what is tantamount to a handful of paragraphs that don\u2019t truly tackle the topic.  Its hard to process it took three NY Times writers to create a piece that lacks so much depth.\n\nRUBRIC 2 - APPROPRIATENESS FOR INTENDED AUDIENCE \nSCORE: 2\nCOMMENT: Appropriate in concept. Wildly inappropriate in execution. \n\nRUBRIC 3 - FRAMING OF THE ISSUE \nSCORE: 4\nCOMMENT:  In this category -  the tepid trinity did very well. The global perspective was very much welcome and befitting for the publication and this prestigious award. \n","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":2,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3335":{"comments":"RUBRIC 1 - EXCELLENCE OF CRAFT\nSCORE: 3\nCOMMENT:  For me, the craft starts at inception - at story selection. And this was a stellar one. But the craft is essentially: writing - and this was not a stellar sample. Solid, straightforward, and classic writing for sure. But what a missed opportunity to actually humanize a story about minors by including them - or parent voices. The writer definitely made an attempt to show the impact of the problem, but failed by not actually doing the reportage that would have enriched this piece. \n\nRUBRIC 2 - APPROPRIATENESS FOR INTENDED AUDIENCE \nSCORE: 4\nCOMMENT: Time? Yup! This piece felt very apropo for the brand in keeping us abreast of the times. \n\nRUBRIC 3 - FRAMING OF THE ISSUE \nSCORE: 3\nCOMMENT: It was framed well - were this about politicians holding the mirror up to politicians. And certainly were this about Social Media holding the mirror up. But there is precious context here for how traditional media plays a role. And for me that made it lack some points.\n","scores":{"Framing of the issue: ":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Excellence of craft:":3}},"3422":{"comments":"\nRUBRIC 1 - EXCELLENCE OF CRAFT\nSCORE: 5\nCOMMENT: For me - a very strong article. Well written, classic sports reportage complimented by so many other forms of storytelling (profiles -Cue, Messi), technology (Apple) and best of all - media. Schube did an excellent job here of telling several stories at once and giving us the education and entertainment value that makes an article sing! \n\nRUBRIC 2 - APPROPRIATENESS FOR INTENDED AUDIENCE \nSCORE: 5\nCOMMENT: Gentlemen\u2019s Quarterly!? Yes - a conversation on sports\/ tech is right up the alley. The in depth intellectual approach is also right on brand for the GQ man. \n\nRUBRIC 3 - FRAMING OF THE ISSUE \nSCORE: 4\nCOMMENT: Truly - picture perfect. Shube provided so many layers of context that even a non-sports aficionado can keep up and not lose interest. What always matters most is how it connects to media - and that was essentially the crux of this piece. Well done.  Points off though for a missed opportunity ( or was it intentional?) what Cue is doing is changing more than how we view the game - but in so many ways the game itself. That media \/ a media platform \/ a media executive - has this access, leverage and power is wildly interesting - and would have been worth highlighting.\n","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3457":{"comments":"\n\nRUBRIC 1 - EXCELLENCE OF CRAFT\nSCORE:  2\nCOMMENT: Another very weak article. It started strong - with powerful story selection and title and ended limp with what is tantamount to a handful of paragraphs that don\u2019t truly tackle the topic.  Its hard to process it took three NY Times writers to create a piece that lacks so much depth.\n\nRUBRIC 2 - APPROPRIATENESS FOR INTENDED AUDIENCE \nSCORE: 2\nCOMMENT: Appropriate in concept. Wildly inappropriate in execution. \n\nRUBRIC 3 - FRAMING OF THE ISSUE \nSCORE: 4\nCOMMENT:  In this category -  the tepid trinity did very well. The global perspective was very much welcome and befitting for the publication and this prestigious award. \n","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":2,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3465":{"comments":"RUBRIC 1 - EXCELLENCE OF CRAFT\nSCORE: 3\nCOMMENT: It was solid but not stellar. And while the writers did a fair job in relaying the events, contextualizing the text by Tucker, etc - they played much too coy when i comes to pointing out the bigger picture here and what his dismissal truly signifies when it comes to Fox and political coverage\/ networks at large. \n\n\nRUBRIC 2 - APPROPRIATENESS FOR INTENDED AUDIENCE \nSCORE:  3\nCOMMENT: Appropriate. But underserved audience by not digging deeper. \n\nRUBRIC 3 - FRAMING OF THE ISSUE \nSCORE: 3\nCOMMENT:Again - as in above categories - a fair enough job here. But not enough. It just feels like there was more story left. \n","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3491":{"comments":"\nRUBRIC 1 - EXCELLENCE OF CRAFT\nSCORE: 5\nCOMMENT: This story was absolutely divine and delicious!!!!!From start to finish. This was such a well structured, well crafted, well written story. I cannot fault anything here. Bravo.\n\nRUBRIC 2 - APPROPRIATENESS FOR INTENDED AUDIENCE \nSCORE: 5\nCOMMENT: VERY! .And for the first time in a long time, not only appropriate - but even elevates the audience.  This is exactly the rich reportage this publication and its audience deserve. \n\nRUBRIC 3 - FRAMING OF THE ISSUE \nSCORE: 5\nCOMMENT: So well framed. This was a mirror indeed. And gave us a delicate multi-dimentional glimpse into the way we were whilst showcasing where we are. The delicate dance between personal and professional relationships - especially for a small town newspaper - was a powerful snapshot within the frame. Nothing to fault. Ms. Williams did a stellar job in story selection and storytelling. Very much worthy of this category.\n","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3509":{"comments":"RUBRIC 1 - EXCELLENCE OF CRAFT\nSCORE: 2\nCOMMENT: Such a clever title. Such a clever concept. All cleverness starts and ends there. I appreciate video - but not the editing (the crux of storytelling) or the audio article approach where it felt I was being read to. The editing nor writing stood out. Also craft is truly crowned by context. Many of us lived through this war - and are essentially living through another. Where is the context of how this could be happening now - or is not? Just felt lacking.\n\nRUBRIC 2 - APPROPRIATENESS FOR INTENDED AUDIENCE \nSCORE: 3\nCOMMENT: Appropriate. But underserved the audience.\n\nRUBRIC 3 - FRAMING OF THE ISSUE \nSCORE: 4\nCOMMENT: I think framing was strong here. In fact the frame was stronger than the picture. This piece is essentially founded on the transgressions of press - thereby holding up the mirror. And this is ideal here. \n","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"status":"submit"},"bplogiurato@gmail.com":{"2644":{"comments":"Very good piece and interesting issue. Again, stakes don't match up to ones I've scored higher.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"2646":{"comments":"Decent piece and important issue, but quality doesn't match up to other entries.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"2679":{"comments":"Really solid reporting. I really like this piece, though some of the story was a bit confusing to follow at points (there are so many names that it just makes me wonder if it could've somehow been more focused). ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"2681":{"comments":"Solid piece and important issue, but quality doesn't match up to other entries.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"2788":{"comments":"Not really sure how to judge this one.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":0,"Framing of the issue: ":1}},"3317":{"comments":"Interesting angle. I don't know how much this factors in, given that it was timely when published, but it feels a bit like it's lost its luster with Jon Stewart back in the chair.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3465":{"comments":"Excellent reporting and writing, and I definitely remember this making a splash at the time. The stakes here are obviously huge, as they led to Carlson's firing from his top-rated show (and kind of the death of his career, in a way!). And oh yeah, the three-quarters-of-a-billion-dollar settlement.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3572":{"comments":"Not really sure how this one made it through screening.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":0,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":1,"Framing of the issue: ":0}},"3576":{"comments":"Interesting way in to the CNN turmoil. Lots of good reporting. Again, overall stakes  \u2014 who is friendly with David Zaslav \u2014 are lower than some other entries.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3622":{"comments":"Excellent sourcing, reporting, and writing. This is a very illuminating look at the evolution of the small-town newspaper and its relationship with a community. The authors did a great job of both contextualizing the story as it exploded onto the national scene \u2014 and also moving it forward with new (sometimes shocking) details. The subtext is really interesting \u2014 this is a local paper that is thriving amid the \"death of local news,\" and the overall context points to how the media's relationship with American communities has mirrored the shift in the overall national landscape.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3659":{"comments":"I thought this was a very interesting and very unique piece. Lots of great sourcing off the news peg to make this into a fun and illuminating story. Again, the overall stakes of the issue somewhat pale in comparison to other entries.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3700":{"comments":"Interesting look at the dying industry of late-night TV through one of its most (surprisingly) recognizable stars. I don't think it rises to the level of other entries, stakes-wise.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"status":"submit"},"mprussel@syr.edu":{"2683":{"comments":"I wish  I could score this higher\u2014important topic, one that is has not been addressed sufficiently until recent years. Has great potential for  a Mirror award  if it had been more fully developed.","scores":{"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3,"Excellence of craft:":3}},"3323":{"comments":"Basically a news announcement. Does little to add anything new to the sad and serious state of today\u2019s American newspaper. (Interesting observation that readership suffered once Trump left office.)","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3337":{"comments":"If The Atavist article was excessively long, this TIME apiece is too short to support the importance of the topic. Too bad\u2014could have been a valuable contribution to the potential  impact of  social media campaigns.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3379":{"comments":"Atavist claims that its long-form narratives are the \u201ckind you want to read to the very last word\u201d. Actually I could not wait to get to the end. While I appreciate the exposure of this \u201cdark corner of the internet\u201d I found the piece overly long, \nJumpy, and with little context as to the extent of the problem. Limited sourcing. No proposed solutions.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4}},"3473":{"comments":"This is the back story to all the headlines most non-media types read. Very well written,  and sourced, but not sure it gives the fullest perspective and commentary on the media\u2019 s role in society, though it does a good job of depressing and scaring the reader!  Great graphics.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3489":{"comments":"It wasn\u2019t until the last 4 graphs that this piece helped me understand why it was entered into the Mirror awards. Where were interviews with actual fans? Too bad because it could have done justice to an important media issue. issue","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3491":{"comments":"Quite a story! Could be a \"made-for-tv\" feature, though it is quite troubling to think about what goes on across America both within the justice system and within newsrooms. Good storytelling, somewhat \"folksy\", and good \"color\". However, I thought it could have gone more in depth on the loss of good journalism in small towns to drive home this problem, not only for the loss of journalism, but for its impact on the current topic of democracy.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3526":{"comments":"No real problems with this entry, but I am not sure I learned anything new after reading it. It seems as if there's been a lot on how to \"restore Disney's creative spark\".","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3562":{"comments":"There's a lot going on here. It's an important topic, though a bit \"jerky\" in its transitions. Good review of the rise\/fall\/rebranding of \"Ebony\" magazine, and its story of survival. At first, with the Olay anecdote, I thought it was going to be about the ethical pros and cons of \"brand partnerships\".","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3659":{"comments":"I really loved this piece. Sure, it's almost frivolous considering the serious issues facing media today, but it is an insight into the dramatically changed  world of live radio movement into automated music and the 1996 Telecommunications Act. It does a good job of using the passing of Art Laboe as its \n\"hook\" and it touches (briefly) on loneliness in America today. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3673":{"comments":"RE: Craft: Low score because I believe there's a typo on p. 5: should be \"deal's\" small print; not \"deal small print\". Otherwise, I think this is a good entry that provides insights into the current financing of media companies. Appropriate for FT audience; perhaps too much into the weeds for more casually interested audiences.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3700":{"comments":"While I knew much of this history of late-night in the past, it was a good review (esp. for younger audiences). The story of James Corden was interesting. But it's real value of course is using the case of Corden's departure to frame the current challenges of late-night shows. My question is: Did Stelter spend so much time providing context that he ran out of time\/space to really delve into the reasons for the \"diminution\", especially today's cultural differences?","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"status":"submit"},"omneya.ashanab@nbcuni.com":{"2642":{"comments":"I liked the concept of this piece but I think it could use some work. It didn't read as easy as it could have and to an average reader there was a lot of terminology that they may not understand. It serves better as video than print in my opinion. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":2,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"2644":{"comments":"The sourcing in this piece was strong and added some layers to the writing. The topic is interesting but there were some other submissions that were stronger. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"2648":{"comments":"This is a long ongoing conversation and I appreciated the research and interviews that went into this reporting. I think it is missing some more examples besides TCM. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3457":{"comments":"This article scored high for me under framing of the issue, but other entries were more well rounded so I scored them higher overall. It was a good piece. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3465":{"comments":"The writing in this piece was clear and concise making it easy to read. I think it is missing a deep dive into how we hold these media outlets accountable. This was an example of Fox taking action against Carlson, but how do we as a collective hold Fox accountable for allowing someone to build a brand around what ultimately got him fired in the end? ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4}},"3479":{"comments":"There was a lot of good information that related to the media industry as a whole and how it relates to society. I just felt that this was a bit wordy and didn't read as smooth as some of the other entries. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3491":{"comments":"This was a well written piece and the imagery was great. It goes deep into detail which I appreciate. I don't think it speaks enough to the broader media perspective but it was quite interesting for a small town. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3509":{"comments":"This is excellence in Journalism. This video piece holds past journalists and the government accountable. The archival footage was crucial and well weaved throughout the video. The concept of the series and this specific episode is needed in today's landscape. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3520":{"comments":"This piece was interesting but it was a bit slow to read for me. It's an important story to tell but I felt it was drawn out and lacked something to break it up a bit.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3622":{"comments":"This piece was fascinating and had me excited to continue reading which hasn't happened in a while. It was easy to read, interesting and well rounded with all key players. There were different voices, small details and clearly a lot of time and effort put into this piece.  I also liked that there were links to the Facebook posts, it made the piece multidimensional. This was an exciting entry. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3665":{"comments":"This piece was well written, informative and brave. Journalism is about uncovering the truth and shedding light where it matters most and this piece does that. Mainstream media can often hyper-focus on certain details and not others so I appreciated that this did both. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3713":{"comments":"I thought this was an interesting piece and it was easy to read. I just feel like it's missing the framing of the issue. There was good context provided as to what happened and how CNN landed where it did with Don Lemon, but it doesn't give me the deep dive that I was craving into industry trends or if we have seen this happen elsewhere. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"status":"submit"},"molly.simms@gmail.com":{"2644":{"comments":"A solid piece but doesn't ascend above the others to me","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"2668":{"comments":"Sweeping in its scope, and an incredible deep dive into a fascinating, tumultuous world. Really excellent work.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"2679":{"comments":"Fascinating piece \u2013 I didn\u2019t find the writing as deft in this one as I did in some of the others, but it\u2019s a very strong entry","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3337":{"comments":"Somewhat perfunctory wrap-up of a news story, didn\u2019t stand out from the rest of the pieces for review.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3422":{"comments":"An intricate and clever analysis, with lots of nice color and detail, and some good attitude. This is VERY much not my favorite topic but I remained engaged throughout","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3431":{"comments":"A good piece but doesn't live up to the level of its competitors, in terms of the writing\/structure.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3562":{"comments":"Very capable piece with a comprehensive look back at Black publications that gives great context. Such a smart and thorough read, and absolutely spoke to both specific issues about diverse content *and* the fate of magazines in our current age. Big fan.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3576":{"comments":"An extremely strong and dishy piece, with the perfect amount of attitude injected throughout. Really an impressive read with great witty asides--one of the best stories in the bunch","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3624":{"comments":"Deeply hits home for anyone who's been on the masthead at a magazine, and brings up issues that are deeply relevant to our times. Loved this piece, loved the territory it covered. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3634":{"comments":"So juicy and FUN, a real pleasure to read. Full of vibrant quotes and strong sourcing--I think this it's a great example of what a Mirrors piece should be. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3647":{"comments":"A fun experience but doesn't feel as if it fits in alongside some of the other pieces we typically review. It's making a comment on the media industry but in an oblique, creative way--one that doesn't make it contender to go to the next round. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":2,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3713":{"comments":"A very competent piece, but didn't ascend to the level of a 4 or 5 score for me. Some nice sourcing and the story was well laid-out but I don't think the piece pulls out to present a very broad look at the overall social implications of Lemon's firing\/role in the industry.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"status":"submit"},"vilasboas.eric@gmail.com":{"2683":{"comments":"This piece is also just fine \u2014 I think it's a fine essay and illuminating look at the mental health struggles climate journalists might face, but I don't think its impact or reporting feels on the level of some of these other pieces we want to award. (Looking at the whole series on How to Fix Journalism could be award-worthy, but it's not what we're evaluating.)","scores":{"Framing of the issue: ":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":2,"Excellence of craft:":2}},"2753":{"comments":"This is a meaty, prescient (Autostraddle sold like a month later), and well-reported and told story on the fate of one website as a kind of microcosm for the fate of an entire niche-media ecosystem. (This sentence, right at the top in graf THREE, is devastating: \"Autostraddle has lasted beyond the shuttering of Bitch, the end of The Hairpin and The Toast, the sunset of Feministing, the far-right pivot of AfterEllen, and the decimation of a once-vital Jezebel.\") It interrogates the site's history and leadership using vivid descriptions of workplace discrimination and tokenization to paint its picture of dysfunction. At the same time,\u00a0I don't think it never loses sight of how important to queer identities sites like Autostraddle are. I have worked at bootstrapped, founder-driven sites like Autostraddle before and I saw echoes of the same patterns; maybe that's part of why I think the piece is so strong. But I think it's easily in the upper tier of our stories to look at.\n\n","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3315":{"comments":"This piece is somewhat amusing, but again it feels more like a great news story than an analysis or reporting-rich investigative feature that I know Will Sommer is capable of and that we'd want to award.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":2,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3321":{"comments":"I love that Paul Farhi, a respected and longtime media reporter who retired recently, went out on this as one of his final stories. It's a great analysis and engagingly written piece of reportage on a gift that has defined NPR (for better and worse, as he notes in the case of envious public radio stations and dissuaded donors) over the last 20+ years. It's fitting that his career covering both serious and consequential, as well as somewhat silly and trivial media stories\u00a0alike for the Washington Post came to end on a note like this \u2014 the kicker is hysterical, and more importantly the story of one of modern public media's most important benefactors got told.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3325":{"comments":"This is a strong column, and the lines in it are fun and willing to say stuff that I just wasn't reading in the prevailing coverage of BlueSky last year. I am a bit disappointed that THIS, however, is the only New Yorker story we're evaluating, when its media coverage has the potential to go so much deeper and richer. This hits in the middle for me but not at the top of the pack \u2014 it has analysis and research but very little in the way of actual reporting.\n\nNonetheless, I LOL'd: \"Bluesky looks like what you\u2019d get if a tornado hit Twitter and the only people left posting were tech workers, extremely online shitposters with anime avatars and vaguely socialist politics, and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who, as far as I can tell, is the most famous person on the platform.\"","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3335":{"comments":"Not much in the way of sourcing, though an interesting piece. Again, more a newser than anything that has the kind of craft and analysis and reporting we want to award.\n\nAlso lol:\n\u201cThese types of laws are imperfect and maybe they\u2019re not respecting the rights of minors, but maybe they will help build societal inertia and get these out of control companies to be better,\u201d says Jennifer Grygiel, a communications professor at Syracuse University who researches social media.\n\n","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":2,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3337":{"comments":"More a news post than a meaty reported feature. Again, I don't think it's the type of story we're here to award a top prize. The whole framing approach + inclusion of this question \"Yet how much can a social media campaign actually help?\" all feel like tropes at least a decade old.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":1,"Framing of the issue: ":1,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":1}},"3489":{"comments":"This piece is fine, but honestly it's a bit of a disappointment coming from Defector, one of the most exciting digital media startups of the last few years, which is staffed by the blogging pirates of ye olde OG Deadspin. I don't think the writing is as sharp or the topic as consequential as some of the other media stories Defector is known to cover or some of the other pieces we're evaluating \u2014 but it's a neat piece nonetheless.","scores":{"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Excellence of craft:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3637":{"comments":"I like this story about AM radio \u2014 it's a valuable little feature \u2014 but I don't think it's as elegantly written as some of the other entries we're looking at. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3647":{"comments":"Meh, this isn't really what we're evaluating. I also just think it kinda sucks, sorry.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":0,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":0,"Framing of the issue: ":0}},"3673":{"comments":"I like this story because it rightly pins the blame not just on Vice's cruel and chaotic and idiotic and sometimes predatory management \u2014 which made lives hell for so many of my peers and colleagues in digital media and laid off so many more \u2014 but on their specific practice of boosting the company's value when they had literally no sustainable business model. (Other experienced media folks I talk to about this liken the executive team's actions to something like a years-long ponzi scheme.) This whole bit is damning, and presaged the company's ultimate complete failure in early 2024:\n--\n\u201cThis kind of business is hard to manage,\u201d says another person close to the board. \u201cThe culture was high-flying and running-and-gunning and they got into some trouble.\u201d \nOne investor says that Vice\u2019s problem was not the strings attached to the money, but the fact that the company continued to haemorrhage cash each year, burning, by his estimate, $1bn in recent years. What Vice lacked was a stronger voice in the boardroom calling for a sustainable business strategy, says the investor.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3680":{"comments":"This story remains one of the bigger red marks on Noah Shachtman's otherwise distinguished career and added necessary shading to his reputation for producing hard-hitting journalism at all costs. A year after it published, he was no longer at Rolling Stone (seemingly for reasons unrelated, and, it must be said, after publishing plenty of good work), while Siegel was vindicated \u2014 a jury sentenced Gordon Meek to six years in prison. The one knock against this story is that I am not sure there's a wider media context here \u2014 more a deliciously juicy scandal that fellow media people, who know or know of Shachtman and Meek and Siegel either personally or via their bylines, can glom onto. But it's undeniably engaging and if there is a wider context, it's pointing out that all these players named in the story know each other intimately well, useful knowledge for every NPR Media beat reader\/listener  to know.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"status":"submit"},"kristenc23@gmail.com":{"2648":{"comments":"I think the writer tries to bring to light a new direction media companies are trying out. Unfortunately, I think the writer missed the mark by focusing the article solely on TCM. The writer should have mentioned other media companies trying to take this new approach.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"2788":{"comments":"The presentation had a lot of examples to back their case. I would have liked to see educators or students in the presentation. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"2858":{"comments":"The writer included strong examples that support this article. The writer is missing a comparison of India\u2019s government on social media with other countries facing that same plight.\n\n","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3315":{"comments":"This article is a step-by-step of how a forum between the House speaker\u2019s candidates fell apart. The writer included quotes from people on shows that discussed the fallout of this forum. I would have liked to have seen GOP supporters voice their opinion in the fallout.\n\n","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3317":{"comments":"The writer used a lot of other examples from other articles that support his theory on who can be the next host for the \u201cDaily Show.\u201d I would have liked for the writer to include avid watchers of the show. It would have strengthened the piece.\n","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3321":{"comments":"The writer did a great job broadly telling the story of Joan Kroc and her big monetary donation to NPR. Despite the contribution, NPR is struggling today. Unfortunately, I don\u2019t think this is just an NPR issue; we are seeing this across many newsrooms. The writer needed to make a better case for how newsrooms today are going through financial difficulty.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3325":{"comments":"This article gave a broad insight into another social media platform. I would have liked for the writer to include people who have used Bluesky to see what they liked or didn\u2019t like about the app. \n","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3402":{"comments":"I liked that the writer told the story of local authorities using their power to go after a small newspaper in Alabama. What I enjoyed about this piece is how the writer included examples of authorities criminalizing the press doing their job.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3457":{"comments":"This article is refreshing because the writer talks about a newsroom that was politically leaning on one side but is now following suit with other newsrooms by being open to having Trump featured on their broadcast. The writers alludes to the fact that the reason for a turn of events at Univision is because of a recent change in management. The writers do a great job telling the story without telling people how they feel.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3613":{"comments":"The writer did a good job framing the article. They included many good voices and examples in the piece such as the influencers, medical experts, and the companies that are paying these influencers.\n","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3624":{"comments":"What I enjoyed most about this article is the different voices featured in the piece. I gave this piece a strong score because the writer obtained a lot of material that proved the publisher was pushing back on the editorial team. Finally, I thought the writer beautifully tied this story to what other newsrooms are going through today with management.\n\n","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3680":{"comments":"The writer does a good job telling the story of Rolling Stone Magazine\u2019s editor-in-chief tweaking this article because of his connection to James Gordon Meek. I wish the writer would have used this story as a base and connected this story with other instances of newsrooms omitting parts of a story due to different reasonings.  ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"status":"submit"},"BarthS@CBSNews.com":{"2642":{"comments":"It's an interesting behind-the-scenes and contextualizes how MLB changes like the pitch clock have a wider-reaching effect on all aspects of how folks enjoy the game.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"2646":{"comments":"An important topic -- and thought the below quote hit the point on the head:\n\u201cI feel that the tolerance for criticism has reached an all-time low,\u201d said the second unidentified editor. \u201cIt appears that there is no space for critical expression, whether through news, articles, opinions or even concealed within forms of art, music and political cartoons.\nHowever, I question the use of the former journalism student as an expert source in this piece. Wish there was someone who would either go on record or was more seasoned to make some of those points.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"2683":{"comments":"Makes some valid points but is narrow through the lens of one opinion piece and one group's experience.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":2,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"2706":{"comments":"Well-written and frames multiple issues well (changing newsroom dynamics, diversity, mentorship, etc.) with a wide variety of sources\/varying perspectives.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3315":{"comments":"Importantly covers the intersection of Fox News & the House GOP dynamics during a tense and unprecedented time in the U.S. Congress.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3323":{"comments":"An average story on one of many newsroom layoffs\/cut backs we saw this year.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3331":{"comments":"I don't believe social media falls into the spirit of the Mirror Awards, focusing on the media industry.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":1,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":1}},"3333":{"comments":"I think this fails to recognize that outlets did aggressively report on Trump and that a vast majority of journalists are aggressively reporting on Elon Musk -- now even more than before his purchase of Twitter\/X.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3431":{"comments":"Strong piece on an important labor battle that played out this year.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3572":{"comments":"While I agree that trust in the media is low, and viewers have lost faith in \"mainstream media's\" fairness, this piece attempts to hit too broadly, without getting into specifics. It is too filled with vagueties. It also ignores that media outlets did report on the Twitter files, rather relying on a Mediate report only looking at which broadcast Sunday shows mentioned it. That ignores reporting on broadcast outlets' websites, and other well-known publications like the New Yorker, which reported on the files.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":2,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3624":{"comments":"Strong framing of the issue and sourcing. Interesting to read about the history of the magazine's founding, its evolution over the decades, and the way that culture wars are impacting it now. Strong arc. I do question if more should've been expanded on here about how impartiality\/neutralness are still necessary for journalim -- and when\/where those foundations have to reckon with \"wokeness\" or social movements.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3665":{"comments":"Concerned about this all coming from an FBI affidavit. Strong framing\/context however.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"status":"submit"},"cindy.perman@gmail.com":{"2642":{"comments":"I feel like this could have been interesting \u2013 I wanted it to be interesting \u2013 but it was actually written pretty boring and gee whiz. Felt kind of amateurish. Points of the video clips to illustrate the different shots he was describing. That was super helpful in understanding what he was describing.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"2668":{"comments":"Interesting, decent sourcing and loaded with facts but feels a little tired. We already know late night is struggling, kids are cutting the cord and watching short clips online. What I would\u2019ve liked to see and hear more about is what could replace late night. Not so much what happened but more of what\u2019s next? Also, a little sloppy on the copy edit. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"2681":{"comments":"I think the sourcing of journalists was good \u2013 there were quite a few \u2013 but was wanting an analyst or someone who could provide more context. And, I think the construction of the story could\u2019ve used some work. But really interesting \u2013 and heartbreaking \u2013 story about the news business in Puerto Rico and what it\u2019s up against. Loved that there was a podcast to go with it, though I don't know enough Spanish to understand it!","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"2753":{"comments":"Wow. I am so impressed with this site and its writers! This was a really interesting piece. It could and should have been tighter but the scope and depth were impressive. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3331":{"comments":"This is interesting but putting it in the Q&A format doesn\u2019t demonstrate excellence in journalism. It feels more like background or a sidebar for a story.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":1,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":2,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3333":{"comments":"This is a really interesting, provocative piece but it is in the wrong catgegory \u2013 should be Commentary.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":1,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3335":{"comments":"Interesting topic but a very thin story.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":1,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":2,"Framing of the issue: ":1}},"3402":{"comments":"This was a really great story. I think it was well-rounded in terms of sources. And, put the story in a broader context of what\u2019s happening in the media industry. It was also really great story-telling \u2013 I enjoyed the flow of it. I kind of wanted it to be a series!","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3479":{"comments":"This was super interesting! I actually loved it but I think it was miscast \u2013 since it is one person\u2019s account, this should have been in \u2013 and would\u2019ve been a contender to win \u2013 in Commentary. Also, while he was thorough, I kept thinking it could\u2019ve been tighter and by the time I got to the comments, I was like \u2013 oh, I want to read THAT person\u2019s story! (It was the comment about both Gen X and millennials aging out and, with them, Vice and BuzzFeed.) But really, what a great piece \u2013 and perfect for the audience. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3489":{"comments":"I love this! It is great storytelling and sourcing. It made me want more \u2013 like, where can this go? Will big media outlets start contracting small outlets like this to get better quality coverage? It also made me think that people say all the time \u2013 let the free market decide. This is actually the perfect example of that. And, it raises the question of media credentials and how those are decided. The numbers on that \u2013 credentials for men\u2019s vs. women\u2019s soccer were staggering. Also, it was written by an intern? Well done! One thing I would\u2019ve liked is to do a little comparative reporting on what they\u2019re doing to what national media are doing in terms of coverage to really put it in context. Meaning, how many reporters are national media sending, how much air\/print time are they getting and what is the nature of the coverage. One thing I didn\u2019t love is the suggestion that it\u2019s better to have Black media covering Black players. I understand where that comes from but I think it\u2019s dangerous to divide on racial lines like that. Perhaps just a product of inexperience?","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3613":{"comments":"This was such a good story! First, the topic was fresh and relevant \u2013 if I wasn\u2019t judging this category, I absolutely would have read this article. It hit the mark on so many levels of how well-crafted it was: It was well-sourced and it really captured the broader context of weight loss influencers and these companies surrounding them. The \u2018Bestie Bash\u2019 really clinched it for me \u2013 that just shows how deep she was willing to go on this and that makes it a better story. It made me want this to become a whole beat, investigating the regulations around all of this, the legal implications, who the drug companies or telehealth companies hire to find influencers, the implications of Weight Watchers and other companies that have appeared to have ditched dieting in favor of drugs (the perils of being a publicly-traded company) and more. Well done!","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3713":{"comments":"Solid story. I thought it was a really interesting angle and really great writing\/storytelling. Kept my attention the whole time. Though I thought the sourcing was disappointing \u2013 just a few anonymous sources and then seemed like it just quoted from publicly available material. That was particularly disappointing for a two-person byline. For what it was \u2013 a short here\u2019s-what-happened story, it was great. But it\u2019s not in-depth enough to win this category. Also, it gives some context on the bigger picture \u2013 but I wouldn\u2019t say it provides a broader perspective on the media and its role in society. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"status":"submit"},"yerinkim32@gmail.com":{"2648":{"comments":"Interesting look at how this storied cable TV channel stands against the evolving streaming landscape, but thought it was just very straightforward reporting and not particularly revelatory. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"2704":{"comments":"A very well-written, hopeful story on the retired journalists giving back to the industry, and very fitting for Nieman Reports. I think what's particularly interesting is how the writer examined the way changes in journalism intersect with America's approach to retirement. Also great original reporting that not only speaks to the retired journalists, but also the folks pointing out the downsides to this movement. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"2858":{"comments":"Interesting read about how India's government continues to tighten control over the internet. While this piece examines both sides of the argument and India's impact on other countries and their relationship with big tech, I think it could have offered more depth as to why these online spaces are so heavily regulated in India and what that might look like moving forward for creators and audiences. ","scores":{"Framing of the issue: ":3,"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4}},"3317":{"comments":"The framing was strong, and looked at how social media has changed these late-night shows overall, but ultimately not sure if this piece is strong and reported enough for this category. Included great perspectives from former and current late-night writers and staffers, but would have liked to hear more from the search POV.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3379":{"comments":"A fascinating (and heartbreaking) story on the kidfluencer industry. There's lots of moving parts in this story, including the Ramirez family, Piper Rockelle and her mom Tiffany, the numerous lawsuits, etc, but the writer did an excellent job of making it as easy to follow as possible. It was a little lengthy \u2014 it took a bit too long to get to the meat of the story in the intro specifically, and I think there was some overexplanation of internet\/Gen Z culture in general. But otherwise such an interesting piece that sheds light into the lack of protections and regulations in this child entertainment space.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3431":{"comments":"This story covers an important, underreported angle of the WGA and SAG-AFTRA strikes. Also thought the AI intersection was interesting, exploring how AI would affect this group specifically.  One thing that felt missing was a more holistic look at the issue, would have liked to hear from others outside of Latine writers and actors. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3473":{"comments":"An engrossing read on Elon Musk's Twitter takeover, with tons of sourcing from current and former employees who had varying opinions of Musk. Loved that the theme of Twitter's \"free speech\" mandate under Musk to Twitter's \"free speech\" in the workplace was weaved throughout. The net worth-o-meter also made for a fun visual element. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3479":{"comments":"I appreciated the personal POV here, which added a great perspective, but overall the story lacked ample sourcing. At times, it felt like too much of a summary of Traffic. Serves\/clearly written for the Intelligencer audience though and speaks on broader relationship between news media and tech. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Framing of the issue: ":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4}},"3526":{"comments":"Interesting look at Disney's troubles from various angles. Great sourcing \u2014 we hear from folks on the Disney side including Iger himself, industry experts, etc. Though it's for FT, I would have liked for writer to explore a bit more of the larger impact on streaming + television model, and less on investor troubles.\n\n","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3632":{"comments":"Really enjoyed listening to this audio entry that explored Evan Gershkovich's arrest and crackdown of the press in Russia overall. I think this is a great example of a story that was meant for audio, particularly driven home at the end with the Russian song. Great reporting and interviews that were easy to follow with this format. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3665":{"comments":"Really important reporting that reveals how Netanyahu secretly tried to help Trump win the 2016 election. There is a ton of reporting and sourcing here from FBI documents, quotes from the secret agent, etc, \u2014 but much of the story reads as the writer's analysis of all of this info. Ending was also fascinating as it spoke to how history could repeat itself as Trump is once again running for office. \n\n","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3673":{"comments":"Straightforward reporting on the downfall of Vice, but I don't think it offered a particularly inspiring or different take. It speaks to what it looked like for Wall Street\/private equity investors to invest in a creative company like Vice, from its beginnings to what its future may look like. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"status":"submit"},"cmlieble@syr.edu":{"2681":{"comments":"A good piece on an overlooked topic. Gives an excellent sense of the state of PR news media and the context they're operating in.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"2704":{"comments":"Very readable, well sourced. Speaks to the broader state of news and the need for quality journalism.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4}},"2858":{"comments":"Important topic centered on press freedom but the story left me wanting more. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3321":{"comments":"It's fine but to my mind nothing special here.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3402":{"comments":"Well situated in the broader issue of press freedom especially as it relates to small news organizations\/small towns. Well sourced. Ended a bit abruptly for me.","scores":{"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":5,"Excellence of craft:":4}},"3520":{"comments":"Substantive and well written, but does it sufficiently go beyond the content of the two books? ","scores":{"Framing of the issue: ":4,"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5}},"3526":{"comments":"Effective at providing insight into Disney and Iger, and the challenges he faces. Limited linkage to broader context. ","scores":{"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3,"Excellence of craft:":4}},"3572":{"comments":"Loosely sourced at best. Selective \"reporting.\" ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":1,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":1}},"3632":{"comments":"Well sourced. Effectively profiles Gershkovich's detainment and situates it in broader issues of press freedom, reporting in Russia, persecution of reporters.","scores":{"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4,"Excellence of craft:":5}},"3637":{"comments":"The premise of the story is a bit of a stretch since it's not entirely clear that AM is really going anywhere. If the focus is conservative complaint, the story could be better centered around that. There is a good overview of the history of AM and its importance in the contemporary media landscape.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3651":{"comments":"Not particularly engaging but pack full of data with helpful visual presentation. Does a good job of profiling the complexities of the streaming world. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3700":{"comments":"Very readable. Speaks to the changing media landscape and the survivability of late night TV.","scores":{"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4,"Excellence of craft:":4}},"status":"submit"},"jmpedde@gmail.com":{"2646":{"comments":"skip per RC - won't rise. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":0,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":0,"Framing of the issue: ":0}},"2679":{"comments":"Kind of meandered, wasn't sure what the point was. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3325":{"comments":"skip per RC - won't rise. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":0,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":0,"Framing of the issue: ":0}},"3379":{"comments":"It held me from the start because I love these articles about influencers that I have never heard of, and wasn't seeing the turn with the criminal activity, but it desperately needed some serious editing.  ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3422":{"comments":"Nice profile piece on Eddy cue, great overlap of tech & sports. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3473":{"comments":"Likely kicking off a swell of Elon Musk articles, this is perfect for The Verge and their tech audience.   Focusing on Elon has become a bit of a past time sport for the media these days as he's broken apart Twitter piece by piece, but I don't see this article standing out in the crowd.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3520":{"comments":"Perfect mirror on the news industry, well written, well reported.  ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3622":{"comments":"I didn't understand the issue until halfway through - doesn't seem like a great fit for WaPo","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3634":{"comments":"Felt very \"he said, she said\" style of writing and reporting","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3647":{"comments":"skip per RC - won't rise. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":0,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":0,"Framing of the issue: ":0}},"3651":{"comments":"Perfect for variety, especially considering this was before the strike.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3659":{"comments":"Good reporting, interesting article, not very in-depth.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"status":"submit"}},"special_category_1":{"bwgorham@syr.edu":{"3353":{"comments":"Very good story about a very specific context of how the WGA successfully negotiated around AI in a way that neither denies its existence nor embraces the idea that gen AI can replace people.  The article did a great job of contextualizing this in the broader history of union negotiations involving transformatice tchnologies, and that was useful.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4}},"3433":{"comments":"I think this is an excellent breakdown of the various ways generative AI might be useful in news gathering and dissemination.  I think it sometimes veers a little too far into jargon, but it makes up for that in clear-eyed explanations of the pitfalls and potential benefits various strategies offer.  It made me think about AI in the newsroom differently and how it might manifest itself. (interesting to note, of course, is that the article highlights Artifact as an example of innovating in ways audiences might like, and yet since this article came out, Artifact has announced that it is shutting down due to a lack of sufficient audience.)","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3493":{"comments":"Although this piece focuses on an important issue, I didn't care for its tone or the lazy stereotyping that replaced cogent analysis toward the end.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3495":{"comments":"Very thorough, well-researched and -sourced analysis of how OpenAI and ChatGPT became the Netscape Navigator of today and the tensions inherent in OpenAI's turn from non-profit to decidedly profit. I came away from this better understanding the issues and certainly better understanding the relationship between OpenAI, Microsoft, and the other tech players in this. I think it is written well and in an accessible format for those of us who are not techies.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3586":{"comments":"I am a little underwhelmed by this article. It certainly focuses on an important point - should news organizations disclose when they use AI - but I feel like it merely introduces the main lines of thought for and against without providing much detail or analysis. It would have also been helpful for the article to explain what it means by AI; do they mean any AI (is spellcheck AI?)? do they mean generative AI? Do they mean transformative AI (like when a reporter is altered to speak in another language)?  I would have liked a few real examples of how news organizations are using, or might use, AI to better add context to the debate about whether, or how much, disclosure should take place.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":2,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3616":{"comments":"I thought this was an excellent discussion of the various ways AI technologies already do, and could in the future, impact the production of films and television.  I learned a lot from this piece, as it was exhaustive in explaining what all the different technologies could do. It was very good at explaining in clear terms the different processes and techniques that generative AI could impact.  But the overall tone of the piece was perhaps a little too positive, as evidenced by the final paragraph, which suggests \"in an optimistic view...\" this technology will democratize quality storytelling without following up with what a pessimist - or a realist - might posit are some potential pitfalls ahead. I think the piece would have been stronger for me if it included more discussion of the concerns that these technologies raise in addition to their more constructive uses.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4}},"3628":{"comments":"I didn't think there was much analysis of the implications here - it was very descriptive of what the survey of journalists found, but really did delve much into the implications of what means that so many journalists use AI tools while also worrying about their use. Would have been stronger with more concrete examples of harm or problems.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":1}},"status":"submit"},"bjsheeha@syr.edu":{"3530":{"comments":"A good comprehensive analysis of AI in digital news.  Reads a bit like a white paper versus journalism, but it has depth and specifics.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3537":{"comments":"Interesting look at the argument for AI written stories.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3552":{"comments":"These are very engaging opinion pieces.  They are well written with powerful points of view (e.g., \"Publishing \u201cjournalism\u201d written by AI should be deemed unethical\").  In the end, they are just short, well-written opinions.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3}},"3584":{"comments":"I found this poorly written.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3586":{"comments":"Good question in headline.  Again, very thin.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3630":{"comments":"Excellent angle, but a bit thin.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3639":{"comments":"Good reporting, but that is all.  Lack depth and analysis.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3641":{"comments":"Good reporting, but that is all.  Lack depth and analysis.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"status":"submit"},"apbauman24@gmail.com":{"3429":{"comments":"High scores if this is the article that uncovered SI's use of AI but is it? I'm not totally sure who was first. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3493":{"comments":"While the author's tone was amusing, it was not objective and was almost too casual. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3530":{"comments":"I liked that the author delved into legal challenges in the U.S. and author framed the issue beyond just outlets, but search engines as well. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3537":{"comments":"Decent job framing the issue, but could have gone deeper. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3552":{"comments":"More of an op-ed than objective article. Dense writing. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3597":{"comments":"Well written and frames the issue of AI in media in a way directly aligned with the purpose of the Mirror Awards. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3616":{"comments":"Very dense and well researched. Not digestible for every audience. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3641":{"comments":"Well written, the narrative flowed. Author does a good job explaining AI's role in Hollywood, but not overall media. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"status":"submit"},"kecolema@syr.edu":{"3429":{"comments":"The Futurism piece detailing the Sports Illustrated AI disaster was entertaining and insightful. I didn\u2019t know about the companies being used to create clickbait-style content. This story does a nice job of detailing the issues and showing how the overall company's PR statement wasn\u2019t very genuine since they found the company was doing the same thing at its other media site. I also appreciated their disclosure at the end of the article about how their parent company used some of the clickbait sites before.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3522":{"comments":"The article that focused on AI in journalism education was the strongest entry and probably would have scored better for me as a single submission instead of having to consider it with the other two submissions.  I found that article thorough and very useful. There were several variables mentioned and resources supplied to aid journalism educators. The Lois Lane AI article presented some useful information but it read like what it was\u2026a part of a research panel discussion. The article about the First Amendment was all over the place. I\u2019m not sure of its purpose or audience. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3537":{"comments":"The VOX article was straightforward and very accessible. I liked that they found someone willing to go on record about using AI to write stories and all of the issues and potential it opens up for the industry. I was hoping that they would talk to those within the company and they did even though they were anonymous you could understand the rationale for the secrecy. I think it\u2019s important to get more people on the record with how they are trying to deploy AI, so that we can have more thoughtful conversations about AI usage. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3582":{"comments":"The CJR did a masterful job of placing the media coverage of AI into context while also finding wonderful sources to unpack various issues along the way. I enjoyed the use of the different graphical elements to help paint the picture of coverage and even how they use the charts to compare AI coverage to other tech hypes like cryptocurrency. 15\/15","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3597":{"comments":"The three articles from the NYT did a wonderful job of using isolated incidents to frame larger issues with AI and the media. The articles introduced problems and how individuals and companies were trying to address the issues, but they also clearly illustrated that we\u2019re not close to figuring out solutions. I finished these articles feeling like major entities are thinking about these issues for no other reason than to protect their profits, but that\u2019s what it is going to take to spur regulations. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3628":{"comments":"This article did a wonderful job of synthesizing the commissioned report on AI in the journalism industry. However, it just ended after saying what was in the commissioned report and didn't expand with outside interviews or additional analysis. This had a chance to rank higher but it doesn\u2019t go far enough beyond the source document.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3630":{"comments":"I enjoyed the broad reach of this article through the numerous ways it illustrated companies trying to cozy up to AI.  I appreciated the context given toward the end of the article which introduces some skepticism toward AI and the possibility that it could be a new form of hype instead of a real innovative game changer. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3639":{"comments":"This was a straightforward informative account of the AI points that were resolved in the Hollywood strike negotiations. The article mentions neither union got all the restrictions they were looking for but highlighted what they received. I wanted to know more about what they didn\u2019t get and those ramifications. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":1}},"status":"submit"},"emarti48@syr.edu":{"3353":{"comments":"This entry was carefully evaluated based on the specified metrics; however, time limitations made it impossible to provide detailed comments. I look forward to discussing the feedback more thoroughly in our upcoming group session on the finalists.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3429":{"comments":"This entry was carefully evaluated based on the specified metrics; however, time limitations made it impossible to provide detailed comments. I look forward to discussing the feedback more thoroughly in our upcoming group session on the finalists.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3495":{"comments":"This entry was carefully evaluated based on the specified metrics; however, time limitations made it impossible to provide detailed comments. I look forward to discussing the feedback more thoroughly in our upcoming group session on the finalists.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3582":{"comments":"This entry was carefully evaluated based on the specified metrics; however, time limitations made it impossible to provide detailed comments. I look forward to discussing the feedback more thoroughly in our upcoming group session on the finalists.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3584":{"comments":"This entry was carefully evaluated based on the specified metrics; however, time limitations made it impossible to provide detailed comments. I look forward to discussing the feedback more thoroughly in our upcoming group session on the finalists.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3586":{"comments":"This entry was carefully evaluated based on the specified metrics; however, time limitations made it impossible to provide detailed comments. I look forward to discussing the feedback more thoroughly in our upcoming group session on the finalists.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3597":{"comments":"This entry was carefully evaluated based on the specified metrics; however, time limitations made it impossible to provide detailed comments. I look forward to discussing the feedback more thoroughly in our upcoming group session on the finalists.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3639":{"comments":"This entry was carefully evaluated based on the specified metrics; however, time limitations made it impossible to provide detailed comments. I look forward to discussing the feedback more thoroughly in our upcoming group session on the finalists.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"status":"submit"},"fionalgibb@gmail.com":{"3353":{"comments":"An interesting approach to examine an AI win from the legal\/labor angle. Enjoyable read, but I don't find it as impactful as some of the other submissions. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3433":{"comments":"Caswell is clearly a subject matter expert in this field. I appreciated that this piece has a realistic, but also optimistic and even opportunistic POV re: AI's impact on the industry. The piece was well-written and well organized. A bit academic, but that seems fitting for the audience. ","scores":{"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Excellence of craft:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3495":{"comments":"This was a very enjoyable and informative read. Packed with information and sidebars, but easy to take in. Aimed at a more financially minded readership, but certainly very accessible to a mainstream audience interested in the topic. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3522":{"comments":"Interesting perspectives from a publication based in Altman's hometown. The ChatGPT-generated piece was a great illustration of how well (or not) these tools can work. There were some solid examples, and I enjoyed the POVs from the educators, but overall, I didn't find these as strong as other submissions. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3530":{"comments":"This was an extremely thorough deep dive. The formatting helped to clearly lay out the risks and organize a large amount of information. Well written, but the tone struck me as academic. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3582":{"comments":"Well-written and thought-provoking. This quote stood out: \u201cThe more you look at it, especially from a bird\u2019s eye view, the more it [high levels of low-quality coverage] is a symptom of the state of the modern publishing and news system that we currently live in.\" The charts were highly additive. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3628":{"comments":"This piece is certainly thought-provoking, and audience-appropriate. However, it feels like it only just scratched the surface, and is largely recapping findings in the JournalismAI report. I would have liked to have read some examples that illustrate the pitfalls. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":1}},"3630":{"comments":"To me, this was a very standard roundup piece, highlighting how AI has become the next big thing on Wall Street. It was a fun read, but I did not find it particularly revelatory or well written. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"status":"submit"},"aforesto@popsugar.com":{"3433":{"comments":"- In depth report on the possible impact and practical uses of AI in journalism. \n- Breakout into sections makes the story easy to read and clear. \n- Clearly establishes why the writer is the best to author this piece at the top, and explains that the story is based on first-hand experience\/from the writer's perspective. \n- While other pieces in this group are similar in nature (i.e. AI is here, here's what journalists should keep in mind), this one does it most successfully, offering the most information and practical takeaways.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3493":{"comments":"- Piece features assumptions, generalizations and biases from the writer, yet it's not presented as an opinion piece per se.\n- Clunky and unclear sentences and repetitions throughout.\n\n\n","scores":{"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":2,"Excellence of craft:":2}},"3522":{"comments":"AI in journalism is here. Now what? Educators debate how to ask and verify the answer\n- Of the three pieces in this entry, this one is the most interesting, complete in its research, and clear. \n- It adds to the conversation around AI by tackling a unique angle. \n- It does a good job at framing the issue and providing perspective into the role of AI in journalism and society.\n\nAn analysis of AI Content for journalism: Unleash it, or control it?\n- Great job using a made up example to explain the difference between human and AI generation copy, makes it easy for the reader to understand the point the author is making that journalism jobs cannot be replaced by AI\n\nCan the First Amendment keep up with the deluge of machine created information? \n- This piece feels all over the place even for an opinion article. The middle section feels completely disconnected from the question posed in the title and does not really connect in any way to AI (but more to misinformation in general). \n- I'm giving my scores above on the two other pieces.\n\n","scores":{"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4,"Excellence of craft:":3}},"3552":{"comments":"- The first piece feels superficial on the topic (for having been published in October 2023). It offers the most low-hanging fruit opinion about AI in journalism, which feels too high-level and obvious for the CJR reader (and does not contribute much to the already extensive conversation of AI in journalism). It might have been intended simply to be the opening to an issue with more detailed pieces, but it does not feel worthy of these awards. \n- The second piece (on art) does a better job at offering insight into the CJR's experimentation with AI, actually giving the reader a behind-the-scenes look and expanding on the topic of AI in a practical and unique way. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3584":{"comments":"- This piece reads like something clearly written solely to link to other pieces by the author \u2014\u00a0a piece that wants you to click out to get information versus keeping you in it.\n- It's very focused on the writer's experience at the Wall Street Journal, siting most examples to their work there versus offering a full picture of AI in media. \n","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3616":{"comments":"- This report is incredibly engaging, detailed and clear. \n- It keeps its audience and their knowledge in mind throughout, and serves like a full 101 guide to AI and its possible impact and usage in the entertainment industry.\n- It offers strong research, from interviews to data to first person information. \n- I'm not 100% sure it fits in these awards, though, as it feels more like a data analysis study\/research paper than a journalistic piece \u2014\u00a0it is written by a data analyst as well, and offered as a deck on the Variety VIP+ site versus an article\/feature. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3641":{"comments":"- This piece feels repetitive at times \u2014\u00a0it could have been significantly shorter and gotten the same point across. \n- It feels a little too obvious for the audience at Variety, who as part of the entertainment industry knows about the writers' strike enough to render this piece basic. \n- It doesn't answer the question posed in the headline: How the WGA Decided to Harness \u2014 but Not Ban \u2014 Artificial Intelligence. Never actually says how they arrived to this decision. \n- Side note: The online reading experience of this piece was terrible \u2014\u00a0constantly reloading on mobile for ads which causes reader to lose their place. ","scores":{"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3,"Excellence of craft:":3}},"status":"submit"}},"special_category_2":{"aricha13@syr.edu":{"3289":{"comments":"I like the idea here, but this is service journalism about conflict misinfo rather than an examination of media coverage. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3363":{"comments":"Early for an oral history of this conflict roughly a week after it started.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3365":{"comments":"Would have gotten a higher score if it took on a larger exploration of the use of the word \"terrorist\" in news coverage.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3369":{"comments":"This is not an examination of news coverage of the Israel-Hamas conflict.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":2,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3506":{"comments":".","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3588":{"comments":"This one's pretty good- I like the framing of media coverage in the perception of an engaged audience. One downside is that it's focused on NPR-affiliated content, but that can be broad in its own right.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3595":{"comments":"Another with essentially no original newsgathering- this would benefit from speaking to signatories of the letter, for example, for a deeper understanding.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3649":{"comments":"Incredibly narrow.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":1,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":1}},"3661":{"comments":".Opinion essay- limited newsgathering.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3682":{"comments":"Opinion essay- doesn't seem like a great fit for this category in general.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3698":{"comments":"Opinion essay- doesn't seem like a great fit for this category in general.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3717":{"comments":"Well-written, but the sourcing seemed mostly aggregated from elsewhere rather than original.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"status":"submit"},"marcus.solis@abc.com":{"3355":{"comments":"Does a good job of explaining the difficulties of the determining  the most effective and balanced phraseology, but it strikes me more of a listing of examples rather than a thoughtful analysis of reporting on the conflict.  Doesn't feel \"weighty\" enough to be an award winner. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3357":{"comments":"It's an opinion piece--akin to a sports media recap of what the announcer teams said during an NFL weekend.  Doesn't speak to the capital J journalism issues of covering the war.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3363":{"comments":"Interesting behind the scene look into the reaction of the earliest events.  Knocked \"Excellence of craft\" because as an oral history, there's not much in the way of writing.  But the framing is good since it conveys how emotion, logistics, restrictions etc. impacts how information is conveyed to the public.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3410":{"comments":"Calls attention to an important shift in social media.  I would have liked to have seen better sourcing rather than just a \"no-comment\" from X and quoting a study and user comments.  The author's thesis is solid--it just cited a bit too much anecdotal evidence to be an award winner in my opinion.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3453":{"comments":"Good backgrounder of the unlikely media source for Jewish Americans.  However the sourcing is thin--the equivalent of MOS.  Would have liked to have seen it dig deeper into *why* Fox is so pro-Israel.  It only skirts the likely cause at the end: it's convenient avenue for Islamophobia. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3532":{"comments":"Raises similar concerns as the Vox piece, but completely and utterly one-sided.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3536":{"comments":"I feel this was the strongest of my entries.  Gives a good background of how virtually impossible it is to provide independent reporting in Gaza.  Skews pro-Palestinian, but does address the restrictions imposed by Hamas as well.  Clearly not as one-sided the Al Jazeera story.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3590":{"comments":"Strong piece that does a good job of explaining the shift by Israeli media--from independent and critical of its politics, to near propagandists during wartime.  I really wish the quote, \"Objectivity is not a primary concern in this context,\u201d would have been placed more prominently rather than near the end.  It's almost like they buried the lede!","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3592":{"comments":"Again, another entry that in my opinion, does not meet the criteria.  While the media coverage of the conflict is at the center of the piece, it is focused on the impact to mental health and strategies to mitigate ill effects.  It does not delve into the journalistic challenge of covering the war.","scores":{"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Excellence of craft:":2,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3643":{"comments":"Similar to the other Variety entry.  Good framing--numerous examples cited and good sourcing--the article does not seem to accurately fit mission of the Mirror Awards.  While it delves into the source of the divide--it is not an analysis of *media coverage of the controversy.*","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3645":{"comments":"A good recitation of the shift in the Israeli film\/TV industry, but the article does not seem to accurately fit mission of the Mirror Awards.  While it describes the reason for the change, it is not an analysis of *media coverage of the controversy.*","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3710":{"comments":"A tricky one to judge (and maybe to give an award to) because of the complex nature of the conflict.  The argument is to be fair journalists we must listen to both sides.  But the episode is completely one-sided.  Still, Pacinthe Mattar frames it well because when she describes \"punitive, silencing\" measures when the conversation is even broached in some newsrooms.\n","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"status":"submit"},"contessabrewer@aol.com":{"3289":{"comments":"Love Gladstone and \"On the Media\" - found helpful news you can use in this segment.  It added clarity and perspective through examples of misinformation and how it becomes part of the conversation or common perception about the war. But Brooke could have pushed harder in terms of framing of the issue - the \"why it matters.\"\n ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3319":{"comments":"Well-executed coverage of the resignation of the NY Times reporter, including other examples of recent resignations of other journalists over the way the war in Gaza.  ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3359":{"comments":"The editorial board of the New Humanitarian take a position and support their thesis with solid examples and A+  \"if-then\" logic exercises.  It includes context and statements in response to its allegations.   This is compelling commentary that should be read by the leadership of news organizations everywhere and should prompt journalists to examine internal bias, however unintentional, in the words we choose.","scores":{"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5,"Excellence of craft:":4}},"3361":{"comments":"This is an easily digestible version of the Vox piece- less research, fewer sources while maintaining the broad thesis that journalists are dying trying to do the increasingly difficult task of covering the war on Gaza. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3410":{"comments":"Pithy.  Provocative. A portentous look at what\u2019s to come in the intersection of social media and the news and how we got here.  \nChayka takes a hard look at the social media platforms and how the content they serve is failing their users.  ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3435":{"comments":"Covering a panel discussion is never easy- searching for the nugget that will make the headline.  Kudos to Kekauoha for finding it.  I think this article and the discussion from which it\u2019s sourced are appropriate for the university publication and bring the issue to readers who might not otherwise encounter it. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3444":{"comments":"Gladstone nailed the problem without resorting to commentary.  \"On the Media\" presents  a collection of well-researched clips illustrating the failure of journalists to pursue facts and fairness in their coverage of the  war on Gaza.  Thoughtful.  Engaging with an captivating narrative.  I especially appreciated the inclusion of Dylan Beyer of \"Puck\" who ascribes journalistic failures to the risk of intense backlash and consequence for those bold enough to question and probe the traditional US defense of Israel and its actions. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3506":{"comments":"This is a really stunning commentary with a compelling collection of clips to support  the scathing commentary of American journalists in their coverage of the war in Gaza.  But this is -commentary- - with a clear point of view rather than reporting.  ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3532":{"comments":"Al Jazeera's Mat Nashed does a thorough job of documenting examples of the wide discrepancy in solid reporting on the war in Gaza.  Proper sourcing and context.  Crisp writing. Simply what good journalism should look like. ","scores":{"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5,"Excellence of craft:":5}},"3534":{"comments":"This is a straight-forward well-written news story. Solid reporting.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3536":{"comments":"The research is deep.  The implications resulting from a crackdown on journalism are clear.  This is concise, straightforward reporting- where no dramatic flourishes are used because none are required.  The facts- collected,  sourced and presented so starkly, speak for themselves. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3711":{"comments":"What a thought-provoking half hour.  The set-up to the guests was well-researched and framed the issue for the viewers.  The guest perspectives were insightful.\n In a print story- journalists would have reached out to, say, the CBC to ask for an explanation of why Pacinthe Mattar's story is killed.  For this program - it could have been constructive to reach out and give several major western news outlets the chance to answer some of the accusations about the bias in their coverage.  \n\nStill - I found the \"mirror\" provided by this program to reveal an uncomfortable truths about Mideast coverage - both now and in the decades leading up to the war. \nI'm not sure that Pacinthe Mattar deserves recognition for her guest appearance though.  It seems to me that Al Jazeera: Inside Story should be the nominee for this particular entry.  ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3712":{"comments":"Just falls below its competitors in this category.  And I'm not sure that the guest should receive recognition for being asked on the program that's covering the topic.  ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"status":"submit"},"nicholasjdesantis@gmail.com":{"2840":{"comments":"This is the most captivating and well-reported article that I've had to review this year. From the collection of slack messages as the headline was being covered to the granular detail of the ultimate fallout from the decision to attribute the bombing to Israel, the reporting was excellent and the story made for a captivating read, as well as a cautionary tale and reminder to let the fog of war dissipate and ensure your sources are ironclad before you assign blame. This is the type of content that rises to the level of a Mirror Award winner.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3355":{"comments":"Looking at the Israel\/Palestine conflict through the lens of Amanda Barrett and other editorial standard-bearers is a very creative way to take a macro look at the controversy and disagreement on how to frame the conflict. I appreciate the breadth of information, particularly all of the various words used to describe the same thing, showing that nuance makes all the difference in an editorial context, particularly when trying to keep coverage balanced. This was an enjoyable read.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3361":{"comments":"The article has good quotes (from only one source) and salient facts, but I feel like an article that would ultimately win a Mirror Award would delve a bit deeper than what's here. This article just feels a bit unexceptional to me.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3363":{"comments":"Emotional first-person accounts of on-the-ground reporters made this a harrowing read. I was surprised to see something as dense as this on Deadline, but I appreciate the detailed picture this showed, truly underlining the importance of embedded journalists in conflict. Very well-done.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3367":{"comments":"A terrifying look into how Hamas is adopting the live-streaming tactics of American mass shooters and updating the production values to make their terror reach farther in an online world. Great sourcing, examples, and historical content paint an off-putting picture of how war can touch us all, made that much scarier by the inaction of the tech platforms themselves.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3499":{"comments":"Approachable, dense with information, and engaging, I really enjoyed this series. It lays out the facts clearly, succinctly, and visually throughout.\nThese are excellent resources for anyone looking to understand the facts, history, and media framing of the conflict.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3534":{"comments":"Short and informational, well-reported, but seemed more like a straight-news article and less like the unique, deeper dive exceptional article that would win a Mirror Award.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3559":{"comments":"Both aid these articles offered incredibly detailed perspectives of the tension between the Israel\/Palistinean war and the media reporting on it. Both were well-reported, and I appreciated the amount and diversity of voices included in each article. These also seemed right at home in CJR regarding it subject matter. Of the two, I think I desk \u2018The Silence and the Noise\u2019 was the better read, and I think it might be because it was a shorter read. The dryness of the prose and the length of the second article made it a bit less engaging overall, hence the 3 for \u2018craft:\u2019","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3588":{"comments":"Thorough and well-reported, with Felton\u2019s quotes and method binding the past and present together, I really appreciated the use of numbers and statistics to illuminate the perspectives of critics of NPR\u2019s coverage, paired simultaneously with the company\u2019s methodology in how they try to keep their lens balanced and unbiased. If anything, bringing in more of a wide selection of the critics letters and comments may have been even more illuminating. A great example of an outlet using their micro perspective to tell the macro story.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3595":{"comments":"Short and to the point, the brevity of this article shows its strength and its weakness. The impact of the article is right there in the headline: 750 journalists formally united to cast Israel\u2019s actions using harsher language, but after documenting that, the article could\u2019ve used more perspectives and quotes to buttress the rationale of that action (although the article did provide some salient points in the quotes).  The dryness and straightforward nature of the article made it lose some \u201ccraft\u201d points here.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3645":{"comments":"While it\u2019s definitely unique to read about the impact of the war on the Israeli entertainment industry, I found this article to be a bit short and repetitive in the quotes cited. Although the pain and suffering within this industry is palpable even in this facet of the aftermath of the attack, this article didn\u2019t stand out to me as one that would be singled out for a Mirror award.","scores":{"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Excellence of craft:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3712":{"comments":"A very Illuminating podcast episode. Seeing the frustration, exasperation, and pain in the participants\u2019 eyes as they make their points and detail their accounts makes it all that much more visceral. At one point, I wondered if having someone on hand to provide a counterpoint would\u2019ve provided a balance in opinion, but I quickly realized that the entire mainstream portrayal of Palestinians (and lack thereof) is the counterpoint they\u2019re trying to clarify and change.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5}},"status":"submit"},"nmibrown@syr.edu":{"3359":{"comments":"Solid entry, good writing and pointed comments about the media and how it can do better, seen through the lens of the conflict in the Middle East but broadly applicable.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3367":{"comments":"Good article, but I'm not sure that Harwell's discussion of tech's content moderation really shines a mirror on the media. (Certainly content moderation decisions would be a good frame for looking at the media, but Harwell doesn't do that here, and just says they haven't been good about it and that's likely to be the case here.)","scores":{"Framing of the issue: ":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Excellence of craft:":4}},"3428":{"comments":"This was a well-produced story that was really engaging, but ultimately was more about the comms blackout in Gaza, and not as much about the media and its role.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3444":{"comments":"This was very well done all around. Good use of sound bites, good framing of this issue.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3499":{"comments":"This entry was more challenging for me than Saeed's first entry, because of some of the subjectivity used in the style guide videos. I still thought they were well put together and produced, but less so than the previous entry.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3506":{"comments":"I thought this was excellent all around.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3536":{"comments":"Unlike some of the other entries, this one was very heavy on the danger journalists are in and the targeting of journalists by Israel. There was less of a focus ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3559":{"comments":"The silence and the noise. \nWriting was a bit dense and didn't flow well. Didn't love the transition to the first person, which seemed odd here to use at all. Underlying issue was newsworthy, I just don't think this journalist did a great job with the piece.\n\nHow Gaza changed the rules.\nDoesn't show excellence of craft here. Quality of writing not great. Some good points but also some dubious analogies that undermined the credibility of the author.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3592":{"comments":"The topic was strong, but the introduction weak. Defining PTSD in graph two? The writing and organization were also lacking. They offered tips to reduce stress. Is this article offering a perspective on how the media contribute to stress or tips to readers on how to avoid severe psychological impact when reading about the conflict?","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3601":{"comments":"First article offered a good critique of journalistic choices re photos, but second (Fox News) and third (social media and traditional) were less mirrors, which brought rating down for me. All pieces were well-written.\n\nNot sure why the articles were submitted by different authors? Shouldn't these have been different entries?","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4}},"3661":{"comments":"Author does a great job of framing the issues. Wish the writing was a little tighter\/less casual.","scores":{"Framing of the issue: ":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Excellence of craft:":3}},"3711":{"comments":"It's hard to judge the excellence of craft on a news appearance, so perhaps my score is unfairly low on this point, but Mattar's comments didn't seem to rise to the level of \"holding the mirror\" that many of the other pieces have.\n\nHowever, Mattar certainly knew her material and presented it clearly and succinctly. It was evident that she has a lot of passion for this subject, and connected well with the audience (at least me). ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3717":{"comments":"Very well-written pieces that framed and contextualized the issues well.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"status":"submit"},"jnglass@syr.edu":{"2840":{"comments":"This series of stories was interesting as to the decisions being made in the Times newsroom about individual episodes..","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3319":{"comments":"N\/A","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3361":{"comments":"Single-sourced.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3428":{"comments":"N\/A","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3435":{"comments":"N\/A","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3532":{"comments":"N\/A","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3534":{"comments":"N\/A","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3559":{"comments":"Of all the entries, this seemed to provide the best \"big picture\" look at media coverage of the war.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3643":{"comments":"N\/A","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3649":{"comments":"N\/A","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3682":{"comments":"El-Kurd provided the best commentary from a personal perspective as a journalist.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3712":{"comments":"Very interesting dialogue that draws upon the participants' experiences and perspectives as the conflict unfolds.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"status":"submit"},"cdhedges@syr.edu":{"3369":{"comments":"Merely a report on TikTok noncompliance with EU regulations. It doesn't do much to frame the issue on a broader perspective. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":1}},"3410":{"comments":"I really like how this approaches another way of understanding coverage in media - through social media. This is a deep look at how social media influences what we see as news, rather than really taking a stance about journalism, it's more about the algorithmic issues facing us today. I really liked this piece. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3444":{"comments":"Exceptional podcast on journalism during this war. Truly outstanding work on sourcing and seeing all manner of ways well-intentioned people can spread bad information. I think this was an exceptional piece. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3453":{"comments":"I like this story - it's too bad it's double-submitted. I think that it stands better with the other pieces from NYTimes on the topic to provide a well-rounded view of media coverage of the war in the US. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3499":{"comments":"This is really well-sourced work and very compelling. It explores how we use our language in reporting and how provides a lesson on the use of framing as a tool for journalists to provide a perspective. I really enjoyed this series and found it really robust. What worries me about this, again, is the idea of it having a clear perspective and, even at some points, a justification for how AJ does things differently. I would like to get a sense from others about how they feel regarding this series. I thought it was really well done, but feels a bit more on the commentary side, but yet, so very well-sourced.  ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3590":{"comments":"This was a great piece and truly shone the light on how journalists are facing ethical dilemmas in reporting on this war that is happening (in some cases) in their own homes or in their towns. This is a complex issue and the writer provided great sourcing and information on the nuanced nature of this dilemma for Israeli journalists. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3592":{"comments":"Great story about the effects of media coverage rather than \"best story on media's coverage\" - I think it brings up important aspects and I'm always game for a story that discusses the effects of media. However, I'm not sure it's the best fit for this category, nor does it really link to HOW the media is coverage the war. Good story, just not really what I think this award is about. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3595":{"comments":"This article does well to address the semantics that are essential to journalists when reporting on the war, however, it lacks that broader scope - instead it seems to be reporting on the petition rather than delving deeper into the other issues that journalists are facing. There is mention of them, but it just seems like an anecdote rather than full coverage. ","scores":{"Framing of the issue: ":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Excellence of craft:":4}},"3601":{"comments":"This one is hard to judge because the Fox News article appears twice in our judging. But WOW, I really like that piece. The sourcing and exploration of the topic are great, and I think they highlight an interesting intersection for our news media coverage. \n\nAll three pieces are excellent at providing a snapshot of the issues and problems journalists face as they cover this war. This is an exceptional set of articles. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3649":{"comments":"This is a great interview and explores a different side of media (not just news media coverage) which is nice and refreshing. However, the point of this award is for \"how the media covered the conflict between Israel and Hamas\" I'm just not sure it's relevant for this award, although it is a really interesting read and great interview. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3698":{"comments":"I really enjoyed this commentary by the former reporter about coverage. However, what is keeping me from scoring this higher is that it is just that - commentary. I find it filled with great anecdotes and a keen understanding of how Palestinians are covered in media, but it doesn't have the same level of sourcing and authority that a journalistic piece has. Therefore, I do not think it fits the criteria for 'media coverage' so much as an opinion piece. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3710":{"comments":"Having so many ads before we even got into the podcast was a bit distracting. \nI like the person that he interviewed. Overall, I think it does a good job, but because it's a podcast and there's personality involved here, I found this to be a little difficult to follow with all the extra words, etc. The conversational nature is essential to a podcast format, but I'm not entirely sure this is the best of the bunch for this competition. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"status":"submit"},"wasim.ahmad@gmail.com":{"3289":{"comments":"A timely lesson in news literacy delivered through the lens of the Israeli Palestinian conflict. Well done tips and techniques about detecting BS information online, and examples of where that's actively being done in this conflict.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3319":{"comments":"This is a short news brief about a writer asked to resign after supporting the Palestinian side in the conflict. Not much more than that to see here.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":1,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3355":{"comments":"Shorter, but one of the more forward-looking pieces considering it was published on 10\/20\/23. It got ahead of the thorny issues that we are, indeed currently, facing with the language covering this war and provided perspective on why the language is used about the war and why AP chooses to go this route. It's a bit of a weird audience for it - general readers won't be interested in this sort of nuance, and perhaps it's more suited to a CJR or Poynter kind of forum, but that said it's good to discuss it at all. To include the hospital attack and the issues surrounding that was a bonus viewpoint in this piece, one that helped move it up for me.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3357":{"comments":"A short shout-out to CNN for its international coverage with little actual substance in this piece.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":1,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":1}},"3365":{"comments":"A very short news brief that cites some editorial policies, but doesn't really dive in-depth here.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":2,"Framing of the issue: ":1}},"3367":{"comments":"A very one-sided look about something Hamas *could* have done - but this piece displays the same bias issues others in this category have talked about. Given the publication date of Oct. 12, that is understandable but still not an excuse to seriously consider this as an entry - it's the kind of entry that's the problem that the others are talking about.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":2,"Framing of the issue: ":1}},"3435":{"comments":"Very basic level stenography-type work of a guest speaker. Nothing of note compared to others in this category.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":1,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3643":{"comments":"The idea is good, but this just reads like a laundry list of what celebrities social media feeds said about the Israel-Palestine conflict and what happened to them. There's zero art at all to this and zero attempt to widen this \"inside baseball\" industry info to a broader audience.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":1,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":1}},"3645":{"comments":"This has aged very poorly - it's the skewed perspective that many are writing about in other pieces in this category, with little focus on the retaliation. Yes, that makes sense given the date of the piece, but even on that date, it seems out of touch - there's a war on, of course other industries, such as TV and film, are going to grind to a halt.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":1,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":1,"Framing of the issue: ":1}},"3698":{"comments":"All good points, many that we've heard before, but doesn't back up anything with concrete or specific examples, or perhaps numbers, and thus becomes an ordinary talking head opinion piece.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":1}},"3710":{"comments":"This piece brings back Pacinthe Mattar (from the previous Al-Jazeera video) and she talks much more in depth (since she has more time on this podcast) about the language and reporting issues surrounding the Israel-Palestine conflict. I think in this instance (given the timeframe of the conflict was earlier here) the narrow focus for much of it on the language around the hospital attack gives it much more clarity of purpose than the other piece, and really dissects an issue with the media buying wholesale into Israeli propaganda, but that said after that it meanders a bit to previous reporting she did (which seems to parrot word-for-word what she said in the Al-Jazeera piece.\n\nI'll bring it up again - Mattar submitted this as the \"author\" of the piece when she is a guest speaker, so I find that a little odd and wonder if that makes this eligible? The number of corrections and clarifications was also a concern.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3711":{"comments":"This is basically a morning talk-show format that recaps much of what was said already about the language and prejudice in the coverage. Why I gave it lower rankings compared to other pieces is that of the three voices they brought on here, Pacinthe Mattar, Ahmed AlNaouq, and Marc Owen Jones, the voices they featured most were the journalist who merely signed a letter but had very little to do with the current coverage and the professor of disinformation. Ahmed AlNaouq lost 20+ family members in an Israeli airstrike in response to Oct. 7 and his voice was completely minimized here when he has the most direct connection to the attacks.\n\nReally strange, also for this piece to list Mattar as an \"author\" when she is one of three guest speakers.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":1,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":2,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3717":{"comments":"These are fine pieces, but reported with the dispassionate language and color of reporters nowhere near the frontlines of this. There's lots of voices, but little detail of the actual damage wrought on the area. It's fine for what it is, but these read like straight news pieces without a lot of art to them. That said, the variety of voices here makes this one of the better collections of what's here.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"status":"submit"},"sue@washingtonindependentproductions.com":{"2840":{"comments":"Comments to follow.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3357":{"comments":"Comments to follow.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":1}},"3359":{"comments":"Comments to follow","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3365":{"comments":"Comments to follow","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3369":{"comments":"This article is not a critique of the media coverage.  It is a story about disinformation.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":0,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":0,"Framing of the issue: ":0}},"3428":{"comments":"This article is not a critique of the media.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":0,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":0,"Framing of the issue: ":0}},"3453":{"comments":"Comments to follow.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3588":{"comments":"Comments to follow.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3590":{"comments":"Comments to follow.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3601":{"comments":"Comments to follow.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3661":{"comments":"Comments to follow.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3682":{"comments":"Comments to follow.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":0}},"status":"submit"}},"commentary":{"hnbrown@syr.edu":{"2670":{"comments":"Overall, stories feel small and disjointed.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"2828":{"comments":"The framing and story remain small and narrow.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3006":{"comments":"Witty, compelling writing, but a dearth of sources beyond his own observation. Positions Carlson as an idiosyncratic phenomenon, so the framing is quite narrow.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":0}},"3301":{"comments":"Makes some excellent points, but doesn't quite develop the argument fully.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3305":{"comments":"Strong POV, good reporting, thoughtful framing.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3341":{"comments":"Strong, interesting story. Some repetition in the first third or so mars an otherwise solid piece.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3343":{"comments":"Competent writing and reporting, but the framing remains relatively small.","scores":{"Framing of the issue: ":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Excellence of craft:":3}},"3446":{"comments":"I love the idea she writes about here, but the piece, frustratingly, never descends from the heights of metaphor to the nitty-gritty level of the concrete. How do these cafecitos actually work? What does the news service look like? I'm left wondering.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3653":{"comments":"Some structural issues flatten the first third of this story and suggest a narrow framing. Later in the story the framing broadens and the writing gets stronger.","scores":{"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Excellence of craft:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3669":{"comments":"Strong reporting and writing overall. The framing is thoughtful and fair, and gets at the larger context. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3675":{"comments":"Good reporting, but the writing never rises above workmanlike. The framing remains fairly narrow. Does not approach meta-ness.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3706":{"comments":"I was wowed by the first of these three commentaries. I thought the third one, about Tavis Smiley, missed some important opportunities for commentary. Overall though the reporting and sourcing are strong and the writing is also strong.","scores":{"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Excellence of craft:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"status":"submit"},"pdhosken@gmail.com":{"2670":{"comments":"The comparative looseness of the language and approach here helps these pieces. Variety is a trade, and so it feels right for Steinberg to take that approach. These pieces are strong, especially the one devoted to the streaming landscape and its evolution, primarily because of the sources used and the blend of strong, insightful language with more general reporting.","scores":{"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Excellence of craft:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3305":{"comments":"The argument is here is solid, but it loses me a bit by not being as backed up with deeper reporting than it could be. The research is there, and it's strong and helps inform the point of view, but what could have elevated this one are original interviews. (A tall ask for certain Substacks, for sure, but one that would've helped a lot here.)","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3339":{"comments":"Would've liked to read more original reporting in this, even though it's an opinion piece, but this is an outstanding examination of why the lack of news access matters. Polgreen uses the parable of the New York Sun quite effectively here to show what might happen as understood but what has happened previously. The care in researching and telling that story is highly effective.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3343":{"comments":"Definitely valuable for being an of-the-time story, as well as for the bit about how news organizations had shifted away from foreign bureaus and war correspondents. Also it's impressive for the number of reporters the author spoke with as well, as they all offer a unique POV. All that said, I still don't think it's technically a piece of commentary.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3452":{"comments":"Nails the correct tone for Cosmo, paints a vivid picture, and is clearly from a singular point of view. But it doesn't quite fit the parameters of the Mirror Awards as I understand them. If there was an element of coverage of said pageant, this might be a different story.","scores":{"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":1,"Excellence of craft:":4}},"3483":{"comments":"I know Douthat's pedigree but it still feels essential for him to report, especially when it comes to presenting compelling evidence to back up an argument. I have issues with the constant self-referential air of this piece, though the argument is coherent and the skill level is high, and it certainly reflects pressing issues about contemporary media and its role.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3540":{"comments":"The lack of fact-checked realism in this piece is borderline unethical. It is not just hyperbole or fear-mongering that AI is an existential threat to journalism -- it's well documented. Not presenting that information here, even within the bounds of a commentary piece, is tantamount to negligence or worse.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3544":{"comments":"Now here's a commentary! Unfortunately I don't think it's particularly strongly sourced, which makes the entire argument weaker. I also don't think the pickleball analogy really holds water, and phrases like \"likeminded bureaucratic minions\" tend to distract from any larger point being made.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Framing of the issue: ":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3}},"3546":{"comments":"A sturdy, moving piece of commentary with great reporting (though I wish there was more of it) to provide a solid foundation. I wasn't sold on the idea of a personal essay until midway through the first section; then it all clicked. But this piece doesn't quite satisfy the conditions of the awards -- there is no real broader perspective on the media's role in society. Government and policy, sure, but no real media element to speak of.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3566":{"comments":"These are, to me, platonic ideals of the form in this category. They\u2019re columns that feel well reported and that present a holistic view of journalism and how it works (and doesn\u2019t) in our modern era.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3605":{"comments":"These are all excellent pieces but, going by the criteria of the Mirror Awards, I don't know that they approach the \"broader perspective\" mandate as fully as some other entries. They're more media interest\/intrigue pieces, and there are implications in terms of finance (and profitability of large national media companies) and politics (the sanctity of elections), but I don't know if these pieces reach the level where they're satisfying the \"framing of the issue\" criteria as completely.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3706":{"comments":"Rainey's pieces are some of the best that I've read this year that do, in fact, provide a broader perspective on the media and its role in society. From its figures -- Tavis Smiley and Ken Doctor -- to its actual bootstrap journalistic operations, everything Rainey mentions here is thoroughly sourced, compellingly arranged, and shines a great light on the state of media in 2024. But I still echo my comments about \"commentary\" and am not sure this fits.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3721":{"comments":"This is an expertly reported piece that touches on politics and media with skill and clarity. Folkenflik had to absorb a lot to make this make sense for readers -- there is a lot of context, as well as broader implications for democracy -- and he does that very well. Its length can be challenging, and the radio version of the story is more palatable. But the length is also necessary given the amount of ground this piece has to cover in terms of context. I don't quite see this as a commentary, though. This, to me, is a reported piece.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3}},"status":"submit"},"noeliasophiadelacruz@gmail.com":{"3006":{"comments":"Well-written and reported. I wish it went even further in demonstrating Tucker Carlson's impact on society but more understandable considering how quickly he turned it around.","scores":{"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":3,"Excellence of craft:":4}},"3305":{"comments":"Compelling examples but I thought the piece lacked focus overall.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3392":{"comments":"Good overview of how television and streaming was\/is evolving. Not the writer's fault but this does feel a bit dated now post-strikes! ","scores":{"Framing of the issue: ":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Excellence of craft:":4}},"3446":{"comments":"Includes some good data points about the disappearance of local newspapers around the country and media's evolution, but I would've loved to learn more about how Conecta Arizona has made an impact with tangible, descriptive examples. (She is its founder so she would be the best person to provide this.) Instead it tends to be a bit repetitive! I would've liked to hear from others as well. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3452":{"comments":"A valid POV, but I wish Tarah-Lynn went beyond her personal experience and provided more in-depth reporting, sourcing and data to illustrate the relevance and impact that pageants have today. This story doesn't include a broader perspective on the media and its role in society.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":1}},"3455":{"comments":"Very insightful, thoughtful piece asking important questions about the role media should play in covering Taylor Swift, a musician with massive cultural and media impact, who has also been successful in owning and controlling her own narrative and generating billions in revenue with her music, tours, and merch. The reporter acknowledges being a Swiftie,  and writes that her own fandom spurred interest in seeing more critical, well-rounded media coverage keeping someone with such influence accountable. I thought she did a great job of breaking down the areas where she would like to see more unbiased reporting, and of including news and sources to contextualize each of these categories.\n\n-Who is accountable for Benevides\u2019 death and for Eras Tour safety decision-making? To what extent is Taylor herself accountable?\n-The underbelly of the fanbase (rose garden filled with thorns)\n-Revisit the private jet story\n-A deep dive into Tree Paine, PR, and crafting a public image (and political voice) with a life of its own\n-Follow Taylor\u2019s money \u2014 especially political donations\n-The scale of fan spending, especially on merch and collectible vinyls\n-How is Taylor affecting the music industry and younger artists, especially women?","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3516":{"comments":"While I don't agree with his personal politics, some of his perspectives are presented thoughtfully (albeit, rudely). He relies on questionable sources to come to these conclusions, but he doesn't perceive them this way. I think some of his arguments have merit and could use further explanation, or at least use better contextualizing by some of the mainstream outlets he mentions. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3574":{"comments":"I have mixed feelings about this - and this is an example of when I feel conflicted about the \"appropriateness for the intended audience\" prompt because I think everything here is appropriate for his audience and ranked him high there, but I don't think the sourcing is all accurate. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3653":{"comments":"Pretty thorough overview and assessment of the reasons and consequences for the WGA strike, complete with data and informed sources. One glaring omission to me was any mention of AI impacting the industry and it being a major pain point during the strike negotiations, as its evolution is a big concern to creators in the industry.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3675":{"comments":"These three articles are well-written, well sourced and provide succinct analyses on what\u2019s happening in each of three major media industries: publishing, music, and TV.  All articles present where the futures for each are trending but I found they all lacked a strong POV from the author.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3679":{"comments":"Fascinating exploration of how necessary it is for people to share their stories, even when they don't know how they may or may not be manipulated. I wasn't expecting so many people to be so accepting of the risk involved in baring so much of their personal lives - potentially without credit or compensation. I thought the reporter did a good job of framing the issue. I'm curious about their previous stories and the way they've used stories, and what may have compelled them to produce this piece.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3696":{"comments":"Leslie's point is pretty clear but I think the story was too narrow.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3721":{"comments":"Solid piece but I didn't feel very strongly about it overall.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"status":"submit"},"rsgutter@syr.edu":{"2828":{"comments":"Different entrant from the usual suspects.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3301":{"comments":"Pretty solid storytelling and framing.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3303":{"comments":"I like her other entry more.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3341":{"comments":"Average.  Another voice complaining about social media.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":2,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3455":{"comments":"This was all over the place.  Enough about Taylor Swift, anyway; more fan swooning.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3483":{"comments":"Not bad, not spectacular.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3544":{"comments":"Enough about pickleball.  Took way too long to get to a point and it's still not clear.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":1,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":1,"Framing of the issue: ":1}},"3546":{"comments":"Sad but well-written and gripping.  Not sure the media angle is well defined.  This is certainly a different look.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":2,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3566":{"comments":"Always strong.  Well done and different topics but prototypical media commentary, typical CJR.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3575":{"comments":"The Grim Reaper from Canada.  We've probably read some of this before.  He lost me on the one column he starts with \"I.\"  Strong writers don't need to lead with themselves.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3675":{"comments":"Strong body of work.  Nothing earth-shaking, but readable and solid.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3686":{"comments":"This is a book review.  I enjoyed it, like most book reviews but this is not worthy of an award on its own.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3696":{"comments":"Writing could have been better.  Writers always lose me when the first thing in the column is \"I\".  Interesting story but is this the biggest media story out there?","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":1,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"status":"submit"},"mlcraig@syr.edu":{"3303":{"comments":"An interesting take, although it lacks any hint at potential solutions. ","scores":{"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Excellence of craft:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3345":{"comments":"Really good points here that the media should take seriously, and very astute commentary based on recent history and the current political landscape. That said, I wish it had been a slightly more reported piece (although I did appreciate the two source links provided). ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3404":{"comments":"Really interesting pieces! They're each very different, but in ways that complement each other to tell a fuller story on changes in digital media. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3510":{"comments":"\"In my last column, I compared Fox News host Tucker Carlson to the CBS journalist Edward R. Murrow, who used his reporting in the 1950s to change the course of history.nFor that comparison I apologize. It is now apparent that Carlson far exceeds Murrow in his courage, his thoughtfulness, and his stubborn refusal to accede to pressure.\"\n\nThese pieces certainly speak to their intended audience and offer an attempt at commentary on media in society today. However, with statements like the one copied here, I can't take the writer seriously. Parroting Tucker Carlson and calling it original reporting is disingenuous at best. It does not add to the discourse. \n\n","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":1,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":1}},"3546":{"comments":"Again, this was very much a personal essay about financial struggle, not really about the role of media in society or even about media in general. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":1}},"3548":{"comments":"This is a really interesting story, but it hardly mentions the news business, except to say that sometimes drug dealing offers the same adrenaline rush as being a war reporter. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":1,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":1}},"3555":{"comments":"This is really solid reporting work, but I have the same critique here as with a couple of other items: It reads as news, not as commentary. Coming from a former Chicago Tribune employee, that's a good thing! But I don't think this fits well in this category. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":2,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3574":{"comments":"Holding a mirror to media requires actual information, not just tired talking points calling everyone who disagrees with you a liar. This lacked sourcing. That said, it probably spoke to its intended ideological audience. ","scores":{"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Excellence of craft:":1,"Framing of the issue: ":1}},"3575":{"comments":"From what I could read, I loved the connection between media dying and the government failing -- it clearly shows that one can't function without the other. However, it was a bit lacking in sourcing. \n\nAlso, despite a note to the contrary, I did hit paywalls on both the second and third links, and I don't see a password here to get me through it. ","scores":{"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":3,"Excellence of craft:":3}},"3605":{"comments":"Well researched while clearly still holding as opinion\/commentary. Both writers ask and seek to answer tough questions about polarization's effect on media coverage of political issues. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3679":{"comments":"I see how this relates to media and its role in society; however, the structure feels confusing. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":1,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3721":{"comments":"This is extremely well-reported and well-sourced; however, I wouldn't categorize it as commentary at all. It's a well-crafted news piece, with every potential piece of commentary attributed to a source. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":2,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"status":"submit"},"sldancy@syr.edu":{"3341":{"comments":"Great job chronicling the growth of social media and pointing out where there exists room for growth because of technology (and workers carving their own paths). The article raises some great questions also about the future of social media and how to use it (\"Where all this momentum leads is anyone\u2019s guess\"). This reads more like a think piece about the state of social media, and what *could* be ahead without offering anything definitive about the future of social media - or how to make it better. Still, great writing and great questions - I would have liked to have seen more answers to the headline. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3345":{"comments":"Good effort here. The writer does a good job focusing on the lessons that other media can learn from CNN's town hall with the former president.  The lessons learned angle speaks to the broad perspective that the competition is looking for -- but the lessons learned aren't terribly new (don't platform Trump or handle him as any other person would be handled, but prepare from the viewpoint of his partisan supporters). And that's such a weakness here - where is the news gathering, where are the facts that would give these musings firmer ground upon which to stand? So, good start, but this is a weaker contender when the others do a much better job of matching the competition's assignment.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3392":{"comments":"   Nice analysis here of an \"implicit promise of streaming\" that \"everything is available somewhere\" is not really the case.\n   The truth, according to this writer, is a return to \"a more traditional television business, where you will find these shows everywhere or nowhere.\u201d\n   This piece is a well-written broad take on the media, but the writer does acknowledge that the main argument of the commentary is not Gospel:  \"There\u2019s a good chance that Netflix\u2019s subscriber data showed that no one was watching Arrested Development anymore, certainly not enough of them to make it worth renewing its lease on the show. So maybe it\u2019s more of an imagined loss than an actual one.\"\n  Because of those concessions, this reads as more like an opinion in search of support than an actual critique of the industry based on objective facts.\n Still, a worthy endeavor here, though not as strong as some of the other work.  \n\n\n \nFor a viewer, devoting yourself to a TV series has always been a fraught proposition, especially as serialized storytelling has come to dominate the form. There\u2019s no guarantee the story you\u2019ve invested in will get a satisfying ending, or even any ending at all. But for a while, the prevailing wisdom seemed to be that concluding a series, even in a different format, would make the whole more valuable:  ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3404":{"comments":"The story's strength is its embrace of such a broad perspective on changes in the way journalism works as a business.\nThis writer goes beyond \"here is my opinion world!\" and offers meaty content about new media trends: a shift to media outlets run by journalists. And the writer has interviewed people to support the story s\/he's tells, so the reader sees that the commentary is supported by strong reporting. \nThe reporter also does a great job giving the reader a broad perspective about:\n1 - the NYT's ability to harness the power of the internet to strengthen the paper as a powerhouse in print and digital spaces\nand\n2- the rise (and fall) of podcasting as an industry\n\nThose perspectives are also supported by strong reporting so that the conclusions the readers get are supported by facts.\nSolid work, and very impressive look at trends in journalism. I think these pieces align perfectly with the contest's goals. \n","scores":{"Framing of the issue: ":5,"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5}},"3441":{"comments":"    This writer explores fresh territory at a time when cable news and talk shows get a lion's share of attention from the public and critics.\n     Her article is well-sourced and that shows the depth of the writer's knowledge about her topic. The news gathering is exceptionally strong -- even without the commentary, this work has enough news gathering to stand on its own. We don't see that in some of the entries here, so that is very refreshing. And how this speaks to media broadly in the US is clear. This work is a very strong contender.\n ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3452":{"comments":"This writer does a great job writing about a topic that is often given light treatment: pageants.\nShe elevates the  piece from \"one writer's opinions\" to \"a call to the United States to evolve\" by focusing on a world outside the US and showcasing how other cultures view pageants very differently. She raises questions necessary for the US to answer in order to evolve and see pageants through a different lens.\n\nHer own involvement in the world about which she writes lends credence to her commentary -- that is something no other writer in this category can claim.\nFar from a lone individual who observes from afar and writes from a position of outsider, this writer has literally stepped onto the stages of which she writes about.  She is the only contestant with that perspective.\n Solid work here.","scores":{"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Excellence of craft:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3455":{"comments":"In a time when every aspect of Taylor Swift's life has been offered to the public in news and entertainment media outlets, this writer has found new territory to explore. Her article does a great job critiquing Taylor Swift - which is a rarity in media.  Her article shows the depth of her knowledge about the writing of other journalists, and she illustrates her own points by linking them to sources that range from the Washington Post to The NY Times to New Yorker essays. This is nice because it takes this piece beyond one person's thoughts and connects it to issues\/themes raised by other writers. Not every entry here does that.\n\nThe article raises valid critiques and questions that could apply to any artist, not just Taylor --- questions about an artist's philanthropy, about concert safety protocol,  and more. That these same questions could be the foundation for articles about other articles shows the strength of the writer's commentary -- this isn't one person's musings or rant, this is a valid critique that has broad application to any artist.\n\n","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3483":{"comments":"This is a laudable start, but the article lacks the news gathering and the facts that (I think) made some other entries much stronger. Because of those shortcomings, this work is more one writer's personal musings about the results of a YouGov survey -which is fine, but it is missing that broad perspective on the industry (not just a survey) that other entries have. The commentary also doesn't offer anything new or fresh in that it focuses on media trust based on political affiliation. Good start, but so many others tackle the competition's charge much more effectively. This isn't an examination of an industry; it is an exemption of a survey. This is a \"miss\" for me.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":1}},"3555":{"comments":"Houston starts off strong with the\"Alden effect\" - this commentary speaks perfectly to the goals of this competition: offering a broad perspective on the media and its role in society. The writer does an excellent job writing about the growth of nonprofit news and how the \"Alden effect\" has made a shift in journalism. Excellent excellent work there. \"Stripped for parts\" doesn't give the reader a perspective that is also broad since we are hearing from the newsroom players who were a part of these newsroom shakeups. \"Lee Enterprises after Alden\" hits the nail on the head by giving the reader that broad perspective of an issue that is a major shakeup for the industry -- it gives history, a behind-the-scenes look, and perspective. This is one of the strongest entries. ","scores":{"Framing of the issue: ":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Excellence of craft:":5}},"3566":{"comments":"Nice job here.\nThe writing here is good, but the biggest challenge is the perspective really isn't broad or new in either of the three entries.\nOne of the entires (\"Before I go\") is more a personal reflection that doesn't really explore any territory. Great points about gaining trust from the public, but the solutions are lukewarm (\"break from the media pack, \"cut ties to twitter,\" \"ignore audience metrics\") - which is all fine, just nothing that hasn't been said before. I have a similar critique for \"The view from the top\" -- good information letting viewers hear from three news organization leaders (and their efforts to be more transparent about their decision making). But again, nothing that hasn't been said before. And likewise for \"Evan Gershkovich, the assault on democracy -- good musings about journalism in peril (because of profits and lack of public trust), but it is very familiar territory.\n\n\n\n \n\n","scores":{"Framing of the issue: ":3,"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4}},"3574":{"comments":"Good effort, but a major weakness is the shortcomings regarding\n(1) excellence of craft (little to no news gathering)\n(2) framing of the issue: the broad perspective on the media is absent.  The commentator also conflates social media with news media. While other writers support their musings with news gathering and facts, these videos don't move beyond one person's grievances. Selective inclusion of content is problematic as well - the commentator points to one Gallup poll finding, while omitting context of that finding. Opinion supported by newsgathering, and by facts, would have strengthened this entry. When other entrants offer musings + facts + news gathering, the absence of those things in this entry is clear, and detrimental.\n\n","scores":{"Framing of the issue: ":1,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Excellence of craft:":1}},"3669":{"comments":"Good effort, but a strong weakness is the author's framing: the entries do not provide a broader perspective on the media and its role in society. The opinion piece regarding the Rolling Stone article about Jan. 6th doesn't go beyond the borders of the article. It is a critique of one article, and a critique based on the article *not* refuting the claims of another entity - the commentary doesn't make clear that making such a refutation was even a goal of the article. \nSo therein lies the weakness. \n\nThe same critique applies to the other entries from this writer: great examinations of just one outlet (the Times-Tribune's efforts to save itself, the NYT's coverage of transgender people). The NYT piece gets closer to a broader application because the writer offers a comparison of the same issue in other news outlets. But that one article alone is not enough to save these entries; good writing, but I don't see the broader application that this contest is looking for.","scores":{"Framing of the issue: ":1,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Excellence of craft:":2}},"3686":{"comments":"Good effort, but this is essentially a book review. The work doesn't go beyond the covers of Ben Smiths' book.  The writer gets closer to a broader perspective on US media but writing about the author's take on the birth of BuzzFeed, Gawker, The Huffington Post, and Breitbart.\nAnd does the same here: each of these four understood what legacy media companies like The New York Times and Conde Nast did not (yet): that attention online could be its own form of profit.\nBut much of the commentary is a portrait of the individual founders of the new media sites - which weakens the entry. Less focus on the players and more on the media outlets would have strengthened this entry. When others met the call of the competition so well, this entry falls short against the competition.","scores":{"Framing of the issue: ":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Excellence of craft:":3}},"status":"submit"},"chandran@gigafact.org":{"2828":{"comments":"The core point is clear and important - involve journalists with background in the communities you are reporting on, and give them a front seat in the work. Got it. However, the piece is an 'advocacy opinion' piece, not an analysis. It is driven by plenty of righteous emotion and jargon and personal resentments and poorly made arguments -  e.g. to show fairness, pay people in lower wage countries the same as you pay their counterparts in high wage countries... \n","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":2,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3006":{"comments":"Sharp and well-written piece on an iconic figure in the modern news and information landscape - at a pivotal moment. Great sourcing and links to help explain his rise.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4}},"3301":{"comments":"Super interesting question about the role and value of objectivity in media and what this means in the modern context, and the complexity of navigating this on a polarized and treacherous landscape.  However, this was sadly just a personal grievance piece, not a meaningful analysis of the question. This could have been made interesting with multiple voices and data to really flesh out the issues, even if a personal experience was the starting point - but there was no attempt to do that.\n\n\n","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":1}},"3339":{"comments":"Very lucidly sets up the problem of disappearing choices for those who can\u2019t pay for news, and the consequences for society.  Explains, and doesn't dumb down, the changing landscape and the funding sources that have disappeared that subsidized free quality news. Done with economy and impact, in a way that mobilizes attention. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3441":{"comments":"This piece that shines a spotlight on long it is taking women to be in the hosts chair in late night shows and the history of all this. Lots of great examples - and I was off looking at YouTube videos of Ziwe and Faye Emerson and Joan Rivers' first appearance on Carson. As well researched as this piece was, and as gossipy and interesting as the writing is, the analysis was a little disjointed. The author can't decide whether she wants to talk about the story of how inaccessible the host chair is to women and the double standards around it, or the decline of late night TV shows. And she ties herself in knots around this - e.g. in the rotation for the hosting job at The Daily Show - she attributes Sarah Silverman\u2019s 3rd place finish to her consummate skill and consigns Al Franken\u2019s 1st place finish to the patriarchy in this format, that's really the cause of it's decline. \n\n","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3507":{"comments":"Wow. I was gearing up to read a well-written analysis of how CNN (and other media) convulses and spasms around Trump, and how they find themselves unable to accept anything remotely positive - but instead got a 3rd rate polemic. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":1,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":2,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3540":{"comments":"\nMakes some interesting points about journalism being vital as a \"supplier\" of good content to AI models, and that they need to get together charge money for content accessed by the AI industry for model training\/other, and has some interesting examples. Interesting opinion and idea - but the article is pretty lightweight. \n","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3548":{"comments":"I loved this story, loved the way it was written. Sadly, this is a story that has nothing particularly to do with the media industry - and could have happened to a mid-level tech executive or investment banker who suddenly finds himself on the outs in his shrinking industry, and turns to weed smuggling to make ends meet (and have some zest and edge to life). It's a great story and beautifully told - but not for this award. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":0,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":0,"Framing of the issue: ":0}},"3686":{"comments":"It\u2019s a book review as a launching point for a commentary. Great view of of the era of HuffPost, Drudge, Gawker, Breitbart, Buzzfeed - of an era that was transformational in the media landscape and the struggle to find a foothold as advertising dollars retreated. I learned a lot. Love the explanation of traffic and ad economics. However got a 3 for disjointed writing and that it was not an original commentary but rather a book review. ","scores":{"Framing of the issue: ":5,"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4}},"3696":{"comments":"It's a sniffy morality\/ethics lecture using a popular media figure as a foil, and an opportunity to present the author's own 'superior' sensibilities around these ideas - but does not meaningfully probe the idea and boundaries of conflict of interest and flesh out with other examples and set up what makes this difficult and important. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":1,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3702":{"comments":"The point is important - what should be the role of media and journalism in a financial crisis. But the piece is lightweight.  Could have been done in a couple of Tweets in the current framing.  Would have been richer with more examples and sourcing and analysis. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3706":{"comments":" The Salinas and Santa Cruz stories were thought provoking pieces on the role of local news, the information holes that appear and the meta question on how they get funded and long term survivability. Great journalism, with local sourcing and broader industry implications. The Travis Smiley piece was well done but is not that relevant to this category - it's a #metoo rehabilitation story that happened to involve a character in the media industry but could easily have been in any industry.  I focused on the other two pieces as sufficient in breadth and depth to judge. \n","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"status":"submit"},"rachel@ByRachelChang.com":{"3303":{"comments":"While I do love where this goes with the repetition vs. avoiding reps\u2026and there is strong supporting examples, this piece just isn\u2019t there.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3345":{"comments":"Short and sweet, as is the NYT format, but packed with insight painted with examples and deeper dissecting Trump\u2019s popularity as a battle, building on media being the enemy.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3392":{"comments":"Clever with the branding of the new term of Trough TV, thorough with its historical context, and poses a solid question \u2014 without the constraint of scheduling, everything's a free for all, where's the end? Standout lines: \"Stanning Netflix feels like being a fan of the gas company\" and \"People might have been less quick to toss their DVD players if they\u2019d realized that nothing was immune from disappearing.\"","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3507":{"comments":"\"Silo\" used as the sole example for too much \u2014 making it immediately feel like there wasn't a diverse range of backup for his point.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3510":{"comments":"Again, this was tough. This series seemed to raise more provocative points (though I would need to fact check), but it's just hard to get through the word choices, like \"smears,\" \"phony,\" and \"You know the type.\" It's not so much journalistic commentary and it is rants. There were some highlights though: \"Yeah sure, to about the same extent that Henry VIII might have announced that Anne Boleyn\u2019s head and shoulders had mutually agreed to part ways.\" Ha!","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3516":{"comments":"I have to be honest that as much as I tried to read this objectively, it was tough. I don\u2019t even think it was POV as much as the language. I tried to substitute names from the other side, and it still felt not like commentary but just a series of jabs. That said, there is some clever wording in there, like \"Ivy League-educated, woke-as-an-Apple Watch, wine-and-slippers crowd on the Sunday morning news circuit.\"\n","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3544":{"comments":"Major points for creativity and out-of-the-pickle-jar framing. Especially for a DC publication, taking a local issue and crunching into it bite by bite to make readers think about how a story is written not just why. I'm in a pickle\u2013I might like this more than I want to.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3548":{"comments":"There is no doubt this is the best read of this group of stories \u2014\u00a0such intrigue and drama, just in the right away for a Rolling Stone audience. That said, while it does very broadly about a journalist's other path, it's not much so about \"media.\" Or commentary exactly.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3555":{"comments":"Smart and essential subject for this journalism review to spotlight a series on \u2014 especially like that it's a package from different sources, rather than one person's commentary throughout. Goldsmith's piece is a bit more \"behind the scenes\" of the documentary than commentary per se. But fits in when you look at them as a whole. The first piece on the Alden Effect definitely offered the most clear reporting and plenty of a-ha moments, but I did wonder if it on its own it's more a feature than commentary. That said, the whole idea of what Alden is doing to local news is commentary in an of itself. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3575":{"comments":"I was really taken by the first two entries, the way he builds up to disintermediation and the lack of need for journalists in the first (\"You used to need people like me to tell you what was going on. Now you don\u2019t.\"), as well as the way he deftly summarizes all the varying social media turning our world around in the 00s, like a storyline... and the NBC example of the Pope announcement was a great way to visually emphasis it all. That said, I was craving so much more essence in the third and was left a little empty handed. (Was I missing the end of the story?)","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3605":{"comments":"It's almost hard to pit these true \"news analysis\" pieces against those with a strong stance of \"commentary.\" Clearly related, but there's a sense of objectivity here.. at the of each of these, the reader is begged to think for themselves about the facts, rather than the others than are more like \"think my way.\" That said, there's no arguing that Rutenberg offers a precise way of extracting the essence of each of these news happens and slicing it in a way NYT readers may not have connected.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3653":{"comments":"The much-needed POV on the strikes \u2014 instead of just relief, what it means for the bigger industry. That said, it took me a minute to really get into it... really felt like it started revving to the point in the sixth graf, whereas everything before that in the lede was what we knew already...not the most compelling way to hook readers in...especially an industry audience for Variety that knows exactly what happened. That said, after that summary, this digs into the greater problem of the strike in an eye-opening way painting exactly why the outdated system is causing issues...and how they will likely continue the way we're forging ahead. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3702":{"comments":"A very Seltzer piece \u2014\u00a0deftly weaving together all the most viable examples to build a strong stance. Ending throws back to the lede and then pushes beyond to what the role of journalists should be in this ethically delicate situation. (Feels like my PDF may have been missing a graf near the end.)","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4}},"status":"submit"},"gjmunno@syr.edu":{"2670":{"comments":"Intriguing wrap of industry news that delivers on providing insights into that news. This may be appropriate to Variety, but the question and lede and elements give it an insider-type feel. I don't think the piece would land with a more general audience. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3339":{"comments":"Another one that does an excellent job of having a clear take (which I like to see in commentary) and backing it up with excellent detail, example, and anecdote (which is essential in selling me on said take.)","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3343":{"comments":"Excellent insights into the media struggles in covering the conflict and the consequences of its lack of attention to Gaza until violence there escalates. I'm not sure the piece has a \"point,\" though. It says something about the media's performance, but less about its role in society. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3404":{"comments":"I love this form of storytelling. Is it commentary? I'm not sure, but it is well done - well reported, sourced, produced, etc. It's also a bit unclear what exactly I am listening to. Is it the entire program, or a part of it, that I am judging?\n","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3441":{"comments":"Well-sourced piece that might do the best job so far of balancing commentary and reportage. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3446":{"comments":"The writing is a little over-the-top and self-promotional for my tastes, but she's identified an important issue, framed it well, and provided insight into an important part of the emerging media landscape. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3507":{"comments":"With each column my admiration for this writer falls. He has a gifted pen, but starts to sound like a one-trick pony. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":0,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":0,"Framing of the issue: ":0}},"3510":{"comments":"Same comments as above. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":1}},"3516":{"comments":"He's good at the rant and the generalized insult against an entire profession (he obviously knows better than to paint the media as a monolith, yet can't resist playing to that narrative). Yet in his frequent calls that the main-stream media is failing, he fails to bring in the evidence that would bring the audience along. He doesn't pull  in the specifics needed to make his case. So unless you have already drunk the Kool-Aid and followed whatever sources he draws from, he's hard to follow and even harder to trust. In short, too much snark with not fact and detail to back it up. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":1}},"3540":{"comments":"This is an interesting piece that fits better into the \"commentary category\" than the others. But the others were more expertly backed up by evidence and specific details. So although I find this piece more appropriate for the category,  it is hard to score it as highly. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3669":{"comments":"Smart, in-depth takes on important issues. I love the reportage. But is it commentary? It's not necessarily framed as such. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3679":{"comments":"I might just not be the audience for this kind of \"storytelling.\" I can see this approach working for 30 seconds, giving us a look at a more raw product, allowing the listener to hear the sausage being made, creating a sense of transparency.  But ultimately, it wears thin, negates any sort of meaningful framing, and simply didn't work for me. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":1,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":1,"Framing of the issue: ":1}},"3702":{"comments":"Excellent framing of the issue, but aimed at journalists rather than the larger and arguably more important audience for news. As such, the end of what is an otherwise excellent piece feels a bit hollow. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"status":"submit"}},"higgins":{"jrosman@syr.edu":{"3396":{"comments":"This was an enjoyable read. I learned something about a topic I knew very little about. There appeared to be careful sourcing and there was a fairness in the reporting here that was careful not to veer into commentary pulling the curtain back at Channel 4. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3416":{"comments":"They stuck with the story. They revealed important information in their in-depth reporting. This was a story that needed to be told and questions asked about how the hire could have happened. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3445":{"comments":"I thought WNYC tackled some important issues. I just wasn't all the impressed with the treatment of the material and relied on more conversational \"back and forth\" instead of enterprise reporting. I didn't feel like I walked away feeling all that more educated or enriched. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":2,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3448":{"comments":"It needed better editing. Felt like the story meandered at times...would veer off...and back on course. This had a lot of potential if not for the editing issues. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3469":{"comments":"This was an exhaustive, in-depth treatment of Musk that was extremely well-written, sourced, and researched and classic Ronan Farrow reporting. I learned a lot. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3542":{"comments":"I don't think an opinion piece - one labeled as such by the Times - belongs in the category for in-depth\/enterprise *reporting*. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":0,"Framing of the issue: ":0,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":0}},"3570":{"comments":"CJR examined the coverage of former President Trump in a comprehensive fashion. The difficulty - at times - is standing out in a sea of stories\/series about the former president. \n","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3609":{"comments":"I thought they did a relatively solid job on these pieces. This didn't reveal as much as I had hoped when I started in on this. ","scores":{"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Excellence of craft:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3615":{"comments":"I think this needed a better editor before the audio story ever went into production. It went down a windy road without giving the audience a compelling reason to be interested early enough on. And from there it was too long and that didn't do them any favors. It struggled to find its footing in my mind. ","scores":{"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":2,"Framing of the issue: ":1,"Excellence of craft:":1}},"3655":{"comments":"This was a breezy read that relied on a lot of anonymous sources that left me wondering this:  Felt like the anonymous sources were settling scores in a story about \"Who's zooming who?\".  \n\nI'm not sure this covered much new territory and my question ultimately is what is the reader benefit from this. This felt like it had the makings of a solid Vanity Fair-type piece that has its limitations in the Mirror Awards and this category. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":2,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3657":{"comments":"The Gene Seymour story felt like it just got started and whet the appetite and petered out. The Musk story at times felt like commentary vs reporting. At times it felt like this entry was misplaced in a category that's for in-depth\/enterprise reporting. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":2,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3667":{"comments":"This NPR story was exceptional. I love that this has a sharp focus and exposes - in an top-notch enterprise story - a journalism scandal at West Virginia Public Broadcasting. This was a great public service in a state that desperately needs strong journalism to inform citizens considering the societal problems a state such as West Virginia faces. \n\nFrom the NPR write-up: \"Relying on 20 interviews and a review of state and corporate documents, Folkenflik revealed a years-long campaign of political pressure on the state network by Gov. Jim Justice and his allies to compromise its journalistic independence.\"\n\nI thought the storytelling let the curtain be pulled back so the audience could follow along as Folkenflik laid out the script. This had listener benefit both for West Virginians but also for a larger audience to understand the issues at stake in journalism. And Folkenflik shows a lot can be relayed to the audience in 5 minutes. \n","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3723":{"comments":"Strong, in-depth reporting blending in multimedia in a series that served the public interest and used careful sourcing. Plenty has been written about Fox. I think this series gives us a comprehensive, yet easy-to-read look at the network.","scores":{"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Excellence of craft:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"status":"submit"},"pgfreedman@aol.com":{"3396":{"comments":"Decent reporting and sourcing.  Did not know this was going on but Deadline audience probably did.  Cut and dry but reinforced concerns of privatization and biased reporting, particularly as seen in the harmful, controlling world of media moguls.    ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4}},"3416":{"comments":"Learned about \"pink slime\" journalism but nothing particularly revealing other than media bias, controlling the message and many inferences to brainwashing students.  Unfortunately this is our world so just another sad notch in the wood.  3 entries all redundant pieces.  Note to Mirror staff.  ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Framing of the issue: ":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3}},"3445":{"comments":"What a brilliant mind! I would give Doctorow, the guest, an award for his captivating, dramatic communication skills on this podcast series.  Unfortunately Gladstone, who is very good in general, cannot get an award for booking a riveting expert.  Also somewhat overwhelming informational piece, but learned quite a bit including \"twiddling\" and that other people on earth still believe in HOPE. \n","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3448":{"comments":"A spun tale, somewhat confusing to follow, well researched.  Certainly points out media's racial issues and media coverups through the decades but not too enlightening. Local audiences will appreciate its importance.  ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4}},"3469":{"comments":"Riveting from intro but expected from Farrow.  Fantastically written epic that holds attention and frames the issue of the dangerously powerful man.  Reveal on Ukraine support and importance of Starlink and Space X in this war.  Incredible quotes tell story in eluding to multiple anonymous sources who frame bottom line...Originally overlooked the significance of his personal control....he's motivated by fear of tech\/AI as destructive potential...hopes to do more good than harm (so far).  Significant points.\nExposes risk potential of many mega billionaires'  power.  Even though aprofile of all his businesses, feel in correct category when demonstrating power of this mogul over Pentagon and strength of X in banking, shopping.   And for now, as Farrow concludes, Musk wants peace on earth.  \n\nThis could be my other choice for winning piece but will wait for judge meeting to determine.  \n\n\n\n\n","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3542":{"comments":"A lighter expose getting some good opinions from sources including, \" why fight it, it's here!\" as the conclusion.  Not such a strong piece and could have been so much more from a NYT journalist.  ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3570":{"comments":"Frankly, trying not to be tainted by reliving this nightmare.  Excellent, impressive 1 1\/2 year investigation so deep.  Incredible sources and use of quotes to advance riveting story.  An exhaustive and nauseating expose revealing both sides of fact manipulation and PR positioning.  Released facts on Fusion and ICA which were not as familiar to most.  This is like another book of fascinating details and the big aaaah...\"fake news\" as word of the year 2017.  Also \"enemy of American people\" from a 1970 Democratic pollster. Of course he plagiarized!!!   I know a lot of this story but confirms and frames the erosion of journalistic standards, norms and lack of transparency, all while evil governments can intervene .  Even how journalism awards are scrutinized by a President! Outstanding effort.  ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3609":{"comments":"Writing very good but straight forward and so well sourced.   Like so many entries, no one talking to investigative reporters in this climate.  This could be a stunning reveal if this was the first story on the subject;  otherwise we knew these facts.  But with these top reporters, could be first expose,  and then, I might grade higher. I remember its publication.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3615":{"comments":"Did not meet criteria for Mirrors in my opinion.  ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":0,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":0,"Framing of the issue: ":0}},"3655":{"comments":"Revelation to me but maybe not to Variety audience of Zucker's plan to buy CNN with foreign money.  Good investigative piece with red flags stressed about foreign investors effecting the viewpoint and probably facing prohibition.  The battle for CNN control was well known in top consumer newspapers, not just trades.  But no real wow on foreign money touching American products.  ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5}},"3657":{"comments":"Three different stories and subject matter by different authors makes it challenging to grade. Mirror staff take note.\nFirst: Musk's story frames this man as the most scary media mogul with unparalleled control over global communications and direct capacity to shape outcome of major war.  These serious revelations make this a stronger story than other two but it's more of a profile.  Some exquisite phrasing when making strong points and concluding with this thought which was eyeopening \"we have missed the moment to create internet service as a public utility. \"\nSecond: More mediocre piece making a valid point of the shrinkage in black and other minority media yet the important necessity that they try to thrive, sometimes covering more positive news than negative. \nThird: Well written right from start to finish, ending on somber note of importance to save democracy!!! Learned there is a \"news desert\" that applies nationwide.  Suggestion of public investment as a not-for-profit provided a glimmer but certainly a tragedy constantly unfolding.  Depressing realization told in frank, clean terms.  Felt pain from the reporter who was once from a rural community.  ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3667":{"comments":"This story of scandal was really well presented.  A dramatic, logical report with excellent sourcing, even with many closed doors in the investigative process. The entry stressed the need to protect the editorial process from undue influence.  Investigations revealed buried stories and control by management, politicians and funders.  A sleazy testament of incestuous games and horrible injustices at the \"golden\" NPR affiliate.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3723":{"comments":"A three-parter that got stronger as read with excellent quotes to advance the story.  A tragically sad chronicle of hypocritical figures and strength of propaganda.  The framing of the rating concerns for this powerhouse, e.g. saying what the audience wants to hear (election scandal), gives one pause in the future.  ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"status":"submit"},"mgscotto@gmail.com":{"3396":{"comments":"Fine article but not among the best of the bunch.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3416":{"comments":"The intention behind these stories was good but the execution just doesn't compare to some of the better written and reported submissions. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3445":{"comments":"It's a fascinating interview -- but it's just one interview, with all the research provided by the guest. Not sure if this rises to the level of the well-reported and well-written articles.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3448":{"comments":"The narrative seemed muddled.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3469":{"comments":"A well-reported, well-written story that does an excellent job of exploring the dangers associated with allowing one person to control the systems needed to access information. My one question is whether this fits the criteria for a Mirror Award -- while it's a story about information access, does it really hold a mirror to the industry?","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3542":{"comments":"The intro is well-written and thought provoking but I'm not sure if the piece should move forward as it is mainly a transcribed conversation instead of piece with reporting and writing.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3570":{"comments":"On the surface, this piece is the epitome of what a Mirrors entry should be: reporting that holds a mirror to the media. This series surely does that and raises a number of good points, but unfortunately it is  one-sided and lacking nuance, despite the extensive reporting by the author.  ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":1}},"3609":{"comments":"Excellent reporting on one of the most important media stories in recent memory. The third article, Missteps and Miscalculations, is the strongest, with strong reporting on the back story of why Fox refused to settle early on. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3615":{"comments":"The podcast is fine, and while it touches on biases in the media, it doesn't really fit the criteria for a Mirror Award, which I thought was about shining a light on the media itself.  This podcast doesn't do that. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3655":{"comments":"The writing is fine, but the article relies too much on unnamed sources and comes across as industry gossip more than a story about the impact a diminished CNN will have on the news industry. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3657":{"comments":"All three articles are strong -- not groundbreaking but well written, well reported and well framed. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3667":{"comments":"Important, well-reported piece that highlights the grave dangers to democracy posed by the decline of local news and political pressure exerted on existing outlets. The writing is not among the strongest in the bunch. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3723":{"comments":"Well-written pieces that don't break any news but clearly and concisely (and visually) tell the story of what was going on behind the scenes at Fox in the aftermath of the 2020 election. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"status":"submit"},"kkobland@syr.edu":{"3396":{"comments":"An interesting and important story as it straddles the line between government and private ownership of a beloved broadcast outlet. A wide variety of unnamed sources, perhaps too many, for the comfort level of this particular judge.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3416":{"comments":"This has the seeds of something important, but unfortunately does nothing to flesh out the story. Piece 2 and 3 seemed to be recaps.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":2,"Framing of the issue: ":1}},"3445":{"comments":"An interesting hour of podcasting\/broadcasting, but I'm not sure this is in the proper category?  Not unless we consider the business of the internet as a new classification of media.  We may also want to rework the wording in 'Excellence of craft' category to include not only writing but of broadcasting\/podcasting too (ie, considering the spoken word rather than written word).","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":0}},"3448":{"comments":"I feel this is not in the proper category? ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":0,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":0,"Framing of the issue: ":0}},"3469":{"comments":"A frightening yet clear eyed look at one of the world's most powerful people.  While this does not place a mirror on the media it tells a story that is far more important.  Again, this may require a broader mindset in terms of what makes a Mirror Award winner (and one might argue the internet serves as the 'media') but in the current state of award structure this may not rise to the level of the intent of a Mirror Award. Of vital importance yes. A piece reflective of media coverage, not so much.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3542":{"comments":"This topic needs more exploration as the issue is of vital importance.  But the author finds a way to suggest that not all A.I. is bad A.I.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3570":{"comments":"Fascinating as this is the only piece of the entries relating to Trump that actually includes a one-on-one interview. But this series of pieces makes a great point and to this judge is the true definition of what the Mirror Award represents. \n\nThis one line says it all: \"My main conclusion is that journalism\u2019s primary missions, informing the public and holding powerful interests accountable, have been undermined by the erosion of journalistic norms and the media\u2019s own lack of transparency about its work. This combination adds to people\u2019s distrust about the media and exacerbates frayed political and social differences.\"","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3609":{"comments":"Extremely well-done reporting and sourcing to paint a dim outlook for either Fox News or our country, as Fox News is still a top news source for many.  These pieces collectively show excellence in craft.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3615":{"comments":"Well-produced podcasts with an interesting story, but not sure this elevates to the award Mirror Award level.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3655":{"comments":"Questions about sourcing\/sources, with too many unnamed people being used for this piece. It's either some great background shoe leather journalism or too much hearsay for the comfort level of this particular judge.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3657":{"comments":"These articles all focus on important issues facing the world and media landscape today. While each topic is important, there did not seem to be a single connective thread.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3667":{"comments":"An important piece\/investigation to be certain.  This seems to expose an even greater issue I wish the author\/reporter would explore--the tenuous relationship between NPR stations and funding sources within the state and federal government. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3723":{"comments":"A clear-eyed recounting with spectacular sourcing (the actual social media exchanges) leads this to not only be a clear accounting, but an important documenting of history from a trusted new outlet.  If democracy indeed dies in the darkness, this series of stories do well to shine a much-needed light on how a portion of Fox News operates. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"status":"submit"},"pbbrady1@gmail.com":{"3396":{"comments":"Much like the NYT tick tock on the Dominion settlement, this is an exhaustive account of events but isn't really a revelatory piece in terms of what I'd like to see in this category. Does it hold a mirror up to the industry and explain how media and society co-exist? Not particularly. Even the crux of the story doesn't really sell it too well: \"Those close to the doomed sale took us behind the scenes of an unsettling and often\nfraught period for a company that boasts revenues of \u00a31.2B ($1.5B). The sources explain\nhow the government pursued privatization for both business and ideological reasons,\nand in doing so, took informal soundings from potential buyers, including Rupert\nMurdoch\u2019s News Corp. They reveal moments of tension between Channel 4 and\nministers, as well as differing opinions about how Channel 4 made its case to remain in\npublic hands.\" And, so what do we as readers make out of this? Even if you allow for the fact that this is a UK story presented to a US audience, we're missing, in my opinion, the sweeping \"what it all means\" piece about public vs. private media, about who owns the control of information, about whether the government can (or should) create a worthwhile media enterprise. Those would've been questions to explore in a different version of this piece that still gave us the tick tock.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":1}},"3416":{"comments":"This story reads to me a lot like the NPR firing piece: It's a deeply reported story about staffing decisions. Does Barnett seem qualified? Not to me. Is it really astonishing that an institution made a bad hiring decision? Not to me. Look, there's some reporting here and some information that's been uncovered, but what you don't get in the first story is any sense of why it matters or what it says: We are missing that \"the move comes at a time when communications schools across the country are losing staff, funding and students, which suggests a looming crisis for an industry already facing significant headwinds.\" Like, where is that?\n\nTennessee Tech defends 'pink slime'\nI love a follow up story and esp one that follows on some original reporting! But most of this is based on publicly available info\u2014see \"the website says\"\u2014which isn't exactly investigative.\n\nMore questions arise\nA public records act request! I mean, that is awesome, and I applaud it. But I'm still wondering... What is the connection back to the broader industry and society? Obviously Raw Story has its own perspective here and nobody would seriously say that Metric Media is a legit news org. So... this is just like shots fired for the sake of it?","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":1}},"3445":{"comments":"Now this is it! Highly entertaining and engaging\u2014yet also well reported, sourced and fact checked. I loved how even though this podcast seems like a single source, it actually draws upon a ton of research and reporting outside of the conversation, which is woven in by both the guest and host. Fabulous scene setting\u2014carnival music was a nice touch\u2014adds a layer to this that's not possible in a print story and is worthy of special mention. One of the best submissions in the batch, in my opinion. Definitely should be sent through.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3448":{"comments":"This is so good! Coming to it fresh, I was worried that the media angle wouldn't be there\u2014was this entered in the wrong competition\u2014but the point that media shapes our history and our reality is made over and over, in elegant tones: \"In a world where eyeballs are internet gold, owning a story could be lucrative.\" The writing is fabulous throughout, and the fact that this piece is in the Post-Courier is also notable. There are many wonderful lines, such as \"Old stories help forge and then reinforce our identities: who we are, our sense of belonging.\" Also very nice to have something different in this category that nevertheless helps us think in new ways about the media and its role in society. For me, one to send through.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3469":{"comments":"A fantastic read with incredible attention to super-solid sourcing. As good as the story is, I do think this is more of a profile of Musk and his attitudes than it is a story about the media industry and its role in society. The slices of the piece that do focus on the media\u2014not just Twitter\/X but also Musk's relationship to the broader media ecosystem\u2014are noteworthy and interesting. But they don't, to my mind, constitute a full-bore investigative look at the media writ large. For that reason, giving a lower mark for the \"framing\" question, while still scoring this as one of the best in my batch.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3542":{"comments":"You know, I was not expecting to read \"They understand how to frame a portrait based on 180 years of photographic diarrhea\" in my batch this year. This is a fascinating article and one of the more thought-provoking pieces I got to read. Is it, though, an investigative story that illuminates aspects of the media business? I'm not so sure. I'm open to new story types and treatments, and I don't think we always have to be strictly literal about what makes an \"investigation,\" as I have been in some of my other comments, whoops. Still, for all its importance and timeliness (study Princess Catherine's latest photo snafu), this article isn't to my mind a reflection on \"the media [industry] and its role in society.\" Rating the \"excellence\" score as a 3 given the fact that there is reporting\u2014but only quotes are as a hosted conversation between experts.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3570":{"comments":"From the very start of the piece, the editor's note, I get the sense that this will be torturous reading: do we really need to ID Trump as \"the man who would be the country's forty-fifth president\" in a story published in 2023? Most of this piece\u2014which is a 114-page PDF!\u2014is meandering to the point of absurdity. Here's one single, solitary sentence that no editor thought better of: \"'Holy shit, Bob Mueller is not going to do it,' is how Dean Baquet, then the executive editor of the New York Times, described the moment his paper\u2019s readers realized Mueller was not going to pursue Trump\u2019s ouster.\" When did he say this? To whom? Says who? And how would Baquet know what his readers had realized? What follows is nearly 30 pages of tick tock about stuff that happened years ago that, while occasionally interesting, does not really speak to the nut-graf written by the story's editor: \"what [American media's coverage of Trump and Russia] means as the country enters a new political cycle.\" Like, honestly, what is the takeaway of this exhaustive chronicle? The most interesting part of the whole package is, to me, the afterword! Lower \"excellence\" score here because of how eat-your-vegetables the whole thing is, even if the author spent an obviously enormous amount of time researching and re-watching. \"Appropriateness\" clearly high but I'm left wanting for \"framing,\" as mentioned above.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3609":{"comments":"How Hard Lines in Fox-Dominion Deal Talks Suddenly Softened\nFantastic details like the Danube River cruise and \"a platter of wraps and salads from nearby Cavanaugh\u2019s\" make this thing really pop. I'm not enamored by the anonymous sourcing, generally, but I do find that most of the actual quotes and documents do have sources attached; that's the way to do it, if you have to. An interesting look behind the scenes\u2014but only works as part of the broader package.\n\nCarlson\u2019s Text That Alarmed Fox Leaders: \u2018It\u2019s Not How White Men Fight\u2019\nThis is a newsworthy revelation and the treatment of the text message is appropriate to my eye\u2014better than the faux objectivity you often see in the politics pages, to be honest! Here's my thing, though: This text was clearly leaked by the Dominion team. (The authors write: \"The contents of the text were disclosed in interviews with several people close to the defamation lawsuit against Fox. The people spoke on the condition of anonymity because they did not want to be identified discussing a message that is protected by a court order. In public filings, it remains hidden behind a block of black text.\" Later in the story, they write, \"Fox\u2019s lawyers had produced the text as part of the discovery process and were involved in the redactions. Mr. Carlson had even been asked about it during a deposition, according to several people who have read the unredacted transcripts of his deposition.\") Is that \"investigative\" for the purposes of the Mirrors? You could argue yes, they cultivated the sources. You could argue no, all they did was received material discovered by lawyers who were motivated by self-interest.\n\nMissteps and Miscalculations: Inside Fox\u2019s Legal and Business Debacle\nYou know, for such a long and damning piece, this is not much of a nut graf: \"That determination informed a series of missteps and miscalculations over the next 20 months, according to a New York Times review of court and business records, and interviews with roughly a dozen people directly involved in or briefed on the company\u2019s decision-making.\" There's also more Times-y language that is leaves me scratching my head: \"Executives were then caught flat-footed as Dominion\u2019s court filings included internal Fox messages that made clear how the company chased a Trump-loving audience that preferred his election lies \u2014 the same lies that helped feed the Jan. 6 Capitol riots \u2014 to the truth.\" Were they caught flat footed? Surely they reviewed the material that they turned over in discovery? (We learn, much later in the piece, that \"That Sunday, the board learned for the first time of the Carlson text that referred to 'how white men fight.' Mr. Dinh did not know about the message until that weekend, according to two people familiar with the matter.\" This seems to me like much more of the story than we get!) And why are we attributing audience preference to... well, it's not actually attributed at all. This kind of stilted voice of God stuff doesn't work too well for me, and there's a lot of preamble in here. As the piece continues\u2014interestingly though with highly techinical language and kind of zzz storytellings\u2014you do get some good lines. For example: \"Judge Davis had determined that Fox had set itself apart by failing to conduct 'good-faith, disinterested reporting' in the segments at issue in the suit.\" You don't say. As we get to the end of the story, there's more good tick tock and it's all, I think, attributed enough (or believable enough) that it feels good. What I'm missing, though, and this is a bit of a refrain from me, I realize, is a sense of what this tells us about the media and its role in society. This piece is about Fox's mismanagement and the fact that their legal team bungled one (or maybe two, if you count Smartmatic). But nowhere in here is any investigation about how the network shifted its coverage, adjusted its practices or did much of anything besides a few offhand references to audience pandering. It's a strong story on its own, and interesting, but it's not really solving for the category question, I think.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":1}},"3615":{"comments":"Ok, so I listened to the entire first episode. This is a fascinating topic and a good podcast, but it is not, as far as I can tell, a series about the media and its role in society. This seems to be a misclassified entry and, unfortunately, my scores reflect that rather than the overall quality and interestingness of this entry.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":0}},"3655":{"comments":"This is more my speed: highly readable, full of previously unreported details, a bit of a sizzler. That being said, I\u2019d be interested in what other panelists think of all the not-for-attribution comments and the somewhat astonishing number of spokesperson rebuttals. (I'm scoring \"excellence\" at a 3 because of all the rebuttals and in spite of what I find to be very engaging writing.) There\u2019s also an element here, as interesting as the story is of, who really cares? What about this piece is really holding a mirror to the industry in service of \u201cproviding a broader perspective on the media and its role in society?\u201d","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3657":{"comments":"I think a full-issue treatment of the media apocalypse is an automatic final-round-er, but each story in the package deserves scrutiny\u2026\n\nElon Musk\u2019s Real Threat to Democracy Isn\u2019t What You Think\nIf you're gonna write \"Musk is a media mogul whose decisions cost lives and affect the world\" you better back it up with something good... And it never fully arrives in this piece, at least based on the author\u2019s own reporting. Statements like \u201cStarlink\u2019s stranglehold on the global Internet\u201d are sensational, without a doubt, but they don't pass the smell test. I just did a Google and Starlink presently has about 2 million subscribers; Charter Communications, to take a single domestic example, has 32 million. This is an opinion piece masquerading as investigative reporting and is not, to my mind, much of a story at all, sorry to say. \nLocal News Has Been Destroyed. Here\u2019s How We Can Revive It\nAnother polemic that's thin on original reporting, in spite of a couple interviews. A long, long story to basically say that the U.S. needs to publicly fund local media. A more interesting story would've spent less time re-explaining the thesis and more time on tossed off comments such as \"Breaking up existing media conglomerates is a great idea.\" And \"So, too, are regulatory interventions that address the damage done by social media giants such as Facebook, which grab up local journalism without fair compensation.\"\nOne Big Cookout: From the \u201cNegro Press\u201d to Black Twitter\nUnlike the previous two pieces, this story is solidly reported and feels fresh and interesting as a result. It's filled with great lines: \"We always suspected that whatever magazines and newspapers for white folks weren\u2019t telling us, Black newspapers and magazines would.\" Author's personal perspective helps, as does a wide-ranging view of the topic. Still, I wonder if this is truly \"investigative\" in the sense that the piece doesn't reveal some great truth or uncover some remarkable finding: it's more of a survey of the state of play.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3667":{"comments":"This is an **extremely well-reported story, with plenty of first-person sourcing that meets high ethical standards for reporting; note all the no comments. Still, it leaves me feeling a bit bored, hence the score on \"excellence\"! There\u2019s so much the author has tried to cram in that it\u2019s all a bit forest for the trees. To use another metaphor, there\u2019s a lot of smoke but no fire. For me, it\u2019s an important story and an interesting contextualization of the situation in West Virginia\u2014but it\u2019s not a particularly compelling narrative or an ah-hah discovery well told.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3}},"3723":{"comments":"I don\u2019t find this to be particularly investigative. Most of the quotes and information seem to come from transcrpts\/rewatch of Powell\u2019s appearances; the \u201cinternal communications\u201d that are cited seem to me to be evidence from trial not independent investigation by the authors. Note the attribution high up of, \u201ccourt documents show.\u201d (And anyway, if they were reported out by authors, why is there no reference to the fact that these internal comms have not previously been reported\/divulged\u2014and who was the source?) A nice look back at what happened but not, to my mind, particularly investigative.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"status":"submit"},"denise@denisevalenti.com":{"3396":{"comments":"I can't see elevating a story in this category based completely on unnamed sources.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":1,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":2,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3416":{"comments":"The writer did a nice job staying on top of this story despite receiving no response from official sources. Would be curious to know if there was any eventual impact. I thought the explanation of \"pink slime\" came too late in the narrative for those who might not be familiar with the term.","scores":{"Framing of the issue: ":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Excellence of craft:":3}},"3445":{"comments":"Enjoyed listening to this, but as an enterprise or in-depth piece, I wanted more than one source.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3448":{"comments":"This was well-written and compelling. Would be interested to hear what others thought about the framing here as a media story.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3469":{"comments":"This started strong with a focus on Musk's capriciousness and his control over communications channels, but it went perhaps too far afield into general profile territory.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4}},"3542":{"comments":"Not sure this fits the category.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":1,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":1,"Framing of the issue: ":1}},"3570":{"comments":"I appreciated the need for this breakdown of the Trump-Russia coverage and the writer's pursuit of the truth here\u2014or at least some better understanding of how this story evolved in the media. It was very dense, perhaps too dense, which seemed to detract from its overall impact.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3609":{"comments":"The WashPo entry on this topic was far more comprehensive and compelling.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3615":{"comments":"The media angle was weak to nonexistent here.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":1,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":1,"Framing of the issue: ":1}},"3655":{"comments":"This offered a take on the CNN situation that I have not seen, but I think there are stronger entries in this group.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3657":{"comments":"It was a little harder to judge this due to the wide range of storytelling included in this entry. I thought overall it offered good insight into the multitude of forces impacting media and from a variety of perspectives, but I was concerned with the insertion of opinion, particularly in the Musk piece.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3667":{"comments":"Important topic, but the execution was not strong enough to elevate this.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3723":{"comments":"This was among the best work that I read. The writing was accessible, and the stories did a nice job laying out the internal workings at FOX News and what led to some disastrous decision-making. Fascinating to see how afraid they were of their own viewers and how willing they were to feed them fairytales.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"status":"submit"},"nicole.brown1@ufl.edu":{"3396":{"comments":"The could have been fodder for its own Channel 4 drama series but, for the purpose of the Mirror Awards, I would have appreciated additional context on what this means in terms of the media's role in society.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3416":{"comments":"This piece could have done more to provide a broader perspective on the media and its role in society.","scores":{"Framing of the issue: ":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Excellence of craft:":3}},"3445":{"comments":"I appreciated the way this narrative was broke down, but it wasn't as god a fit for the Mirror Awards as other entries.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3448":{"comments":"I found this piece very interesting, but there were other entries more suitable for the award criteria.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3469":{"comments":"This was a typically well-crafted piece and a srong fit for the audience. However, it was ore a commentary on Elon Musk than of the media's role in society.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3542":{"comments":"This was an interesting read and the subject matter has important ethical implications. However, more could have been done to frame the role of the media in society.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3570":{"comments":"This was a thorough series and the news gathering was impressive. I struggled with comparing the merits of a piece this long with other entries.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3609":{"comments":"These were strong pieces, but could have provided greater perspective on the media and its role in society.","scores":{"Framing of the issue: ":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Excellence of craft:":4}},"3615":{"comments":"This was an interesting story, but not a good fit for the awards.","scores":{"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":1,"Excellence of craft:":2}},"3655":{"comments":"This piece provided further insights into the power struggles at CNN (and beyond), but could have done more to provide perspective on the media and its role in society.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3657":{"comments":"These pieces weave together an important narrative about the value of a free press to society, the pressures it now faces and the dire impact this poses for democracy.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3667":{"comments":"This was a well-sourced piece that underscored the important watch dog role of the media--and the peril it faces. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3723":{"comments":"Solid reporting, but for the purpose of these awards there could have been a more direct link made to the role of the media in society.","scores":{"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Excellence of craft:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"status":"submit"}},"profile":{"taylormichelepps@gmail.com":{"2838":{"comments":"This was one of my favorites, especially the writing which seemed to mimic the vibe of the interviewee, which I really liked. It's clear a lot of time went into this, it was very well-researched with a number of great quotes from some big, relevant names. Klein clearly really got to know Swisher through this process and as a reader, that made her path much easier to understand, I got it. There was a central idea about Swisher's approach being one of control and ownership was really interesting and I wish we dived just a bit deeper into, why it's so important to know about IP. Swisher truly seems one of a kind in the field and maybe that's why. Overall, a really solid profile, I think it's one of the top ones in the bunch.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3349":{"comments":"This was a good one! I certainly feel like I got to know Vega, while telling a larger story of the world she's entered. I just wish it dug a little bit deeper into the section about the show's strong viewership, despite the declining numbers across TV. I thought it was well written, easy to follow, well-researched and informative. I enjoyed myself, but I didn't feel particularly moved; it's not something I'll be thinking about after I click save on these comments.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3437":{"comments":"Wow. Risen leaned into obtaining this unpublished memo the way the Times leaned into receiving the Pentagon Papers and for good reason. This interview with Ellsburg before his death is absolute gold and was used so well, including anecdotes from him that added so much color to the story. It was written so well with great context that made this story about a 50-year-old publication seem fresh. I learned so much and maybe that speaks to my age, but it read so easily with old and new information and we needed every bit of it in the piece. Risen easily could've just gone through the memo, but he hit the highlights in just the right way. It was so great to add another layer to the Pentagon Papers story, especially showing the larger impact on how it transformed the Times, protecting sources, etc. It was simply excellent.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3459":{"comments":"This piece struggled a bit for me. The complicated world of media mergers and the finances of it all is a hard one to dive into without absolutely boring an audience. And at the start I was pulled in, but the boredom found me quickly. It's not that the topic isn't interesting, especially as many of us stream our favorite content, what's going on behind the scenes can be interesting if you make it. What really lacked here is the actual journalism. I'm not sure who we interviewed, as there were no quotes. I believe everything here, but there was little to no attribution. I think the closest we got was, \"according to people knowledgeable,\" which doesn't feel like enough to me. Paramount's underdog story is, unfortunately, more interesting than Redstone's because we barely heard about her in this profile. It needed much more to rise to the top here.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3463":{"comments":"This piece blends in with the crowd, not very memorable for me. Great information and a great update about where things stand with Bezos, but it would've risen much higher with an interview with the man himself. The writing also lacked authority for me, it read as a kind of \"he said, she said\" about the wellbeing of the company. Morale was low, the one guy spread rumors, he got fired, Bezos showed up again and then bam, Pulitzer! It could've been much more compelling and definitely didn't read as a profile. Overall, I wanted more substance and I wanted it with more gusto.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3471":{"comments":"Wow, this one was great! The last line tells the whole story, but every word above it packed a punch. I loved learning about these women, while learning about the efforts going on at NPR. I'm glad we got into some data and made some fantastic points about point of view and how diversification can add credibility to long discredited voices. This piece was very real and made me want to be better. I wonder if we could've taken it a bit further, maybe comparing NPR to other newsroom by asking the women what their experiences were like or looking at some larger audience demographics. I like the different way each woman's story was approached, but I also wanted to see their faces and more links to there work so I could get to know them as I read. Not as gritty and hard hitting as some others in the lineup, still, this is one of my favorites.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3477":{"comments":"This is a stand-out piece for me so far. It was compelling, immediately. This is another piece that clearly benefits from a lot of time and a really good interview. There was a lot of research done that added great context. The writing was fantastic and the anecdotes paced the piece very well. It also hit some great conversation points, especially about cancel culture and this tangled web we all weave in the media, while not making it feel like inside baseball. I learned a lot and kept wanting to hear more as it went on. A great profile, but it didn't feel limited to just who Heller is. It was very much about her, but also much more.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3481":{"comments":"I don\u2019t have much to say about this piece, I didn\u2019t love it, didn\u2019t hate it. It flowed nicely and I found it interesting, but I don\u2019t think it required much newsgathering or pushed the needle much. It was an interesting profile about a controversial media personality and just an interesting read, no more, no less.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3502":{"comments":"I liked this piece a lot, I had a great time reading it. I loved the writing most of all, but I also give a lot of credit to what was clearly very well-done interview. I felt that I learned a lot and it flowed very nicely, but was I incredibly impressed? Not necessarily. Doesn\u2019t feel like a winner, but far from a loser.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3573":{"comments":"I don\u2019t know what I just watched. Was it a TED Talk or a YouTube rant? I did not feel like journalism. I had no idea where we were going, maybe because there was little to no newsgathering in this. The comments above said more in a paragraph than he did in 10 minutes. I felt like we were going in circles just to speculate what may have happened to Carlson\u2019s position, but made no points about what this means for Fox News, as promised by the headline. This one left me confused, not sure what to do with this. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":1,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3688":{"comments":"This piece had the benefit of falling right after another piece about Musk, this one being much better researched and making great points. But, it lacked what the other piece hit us over the head with, the potential implications on media and what all of Musk\u2019s \u201cwrongdoings\u201d mean for all of us. I loved seeing the hyperlinks, embedded photos and quotes from experts, but it felt like a lot of show and not a lot of tell, especially at the end. The article ended and I said, \u201cthat\u2019s it?\u201d I also found the writing to be clunky at parts. It seemed like they did what they set out to do, but I\u2019m not sure I got much from that.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4}},"3690":{"comments":"This piece was nothing if not passionate. It's clear the writer had a lot to say about Musk and his influence on media and greater society, but I'm not sure this (this being a profile\/feature piece of journalism) was the correct outlet for that passion. It read less like a journalistic report and more like a persuasive term paper. I was wishing on a star for a quote from someone, anyone, but never got it. There was little to no newsgathering in the piece. Sure, he backed up many assertions with examples and links to other articles, but it all just felt like one big soapbox rant that was frankly hard to get through. And if this was supposed to make me think broadly about the media and its role in society, it made me not want to talk about it at all. It started off intriguing, but took a SpaceX flight way over my head.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":1}},"3692":{"comments":"This piece was very sweet, but very surface level. I get exactly what he was going for, he got a great interview with a sports icon and out came all the flowers, but it got a bit cheesy for me at times. I also get that the point here was to be positive, but when the piece started getting toward his hospital struggles, it was over and done with in two or three grafs. I wanted to hear more from Palmer about how scary that is, how that empowered him. What about his family or the people who stood by him when things got tough. The part where he decides to sidestep the turmoil of regional sports networks had me screaming at the computer! Why would we sidestep that, that's our broader perspective. At the risk of sounding cheesy myself, this almost felt like inside baseball. I have a hard time seeing someone who's not a huge baseball or Orioles fan getting anything from that.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":1}},"3715":{"comments":"This was juicy and I loved it. I listened first, then read through and I loved the added context provided in the article. I wanted to know more about Schorsch a little earlier, I felt that would've helped me make more sense of why he does what he does. I felt it sometimes got a little in the weeds with some of the details when being more succinct would've gotten the point across better. For example, it talks about a number of investigations and allegations against him, I was sometimes lost as to who was alleging what and which newspaper had gone after him. I wanted that a little clearer. I like that we followed the money, that part was so interesting, especially showing his Disney trips with the family. The impact is clear about how much of a problem this could be, but I think we could've hammered that point home even more, especially with that expert voice that used to work at the Tampa Bay Times. I really liked it, but at times I just felt the points could've been illustrated in a clearer and more impactful way.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"status":"submit"},"williamfleitch@yahoo.com":{"2640":{"comments":"A little too business-y for this contest, I think--it's less about media than general business succession stuff--which is good for CNBC but is otherwise feels like boardroom stuff we'd see at any company.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"2831":{"comments":"Very fun, and well-written, with fun characters. The only real issue, and it's kind of a big one, is that this story doesn't have any real conflict. I kept waiting for someone from the Times to be all, \"yeah, but those games people are dorks\" or something.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3347":{"comments":"Interesting piece, and well done, with good access--Olsen  is an excellent subject. It touches on the larger world of sports broadcasting slightly, but not as overarchingly as maybe it needs.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3420":{"comments":"Somewhat pedestrian, and has a little trouble picking exactly its point: Is it about this sort of charitable grandstanding, or this guy's finances, or India? I'd love to see him as a small part of a larger piece about the whole phenomenon.  ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3463":{"comments":"This suffers a little bit without having more from Bezos himself--though it's hard to blame the writer for that--but wow, what a lede, just a great, great lede. Illustrates the problem, not just with Bezos but with corporate owners in general.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3477":{"comments":"Good, interesting piece, though I feel like there isn't anything THAT new about this--these fixers have existed for years in NYC (and she's of course far from the only one now).","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3485":{"comments":"Definitely important considering how much has changed and how much hasn't over the last five years ... but there's still an inherent limitation to the format, I think.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3487":{"comments":"their rivalry is fascinating, but there isn't a lot here that isn't other places as well. I'd love the idea of delving more into why and how these reporters are so secretive even though they are so based in disseminating information.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3502":{"comments":"Excellently written and conceived, a fantastic read. blum's an interesting cat, though I think this is more of a profile of him than a look at the larger Hollywood system.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3564":{"comments":"This is my kind of profile: A deep dive that touches on both the psychology of the person and why they're indicative of a larger issue. I don't love the lede that much, and it's better reported than written, but good stuff.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3573":{"comments":"Yeeeesh, I'm not even sure how this got in here?","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":1}},"3620":{"comments":"Not the most gracefully written piece, but very key points made all around, and absolutely fascinating that the media blackout that is North Korea could, in its own way, allow someone to reinvent themselves like this. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3688":{"comments":"Feels like something we've read a lot about it, and feels like it's mostly looking at it from the outside in ... too much so.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3715":{"comments":"This is excellent. It's something I knew nothing about, it notes how it could be going national (or at least more regional) soon and has terrific access to everyone involved, including the guy the story is about. And it frames exactly right and asks the guy's essential question -- is \"combination journalism\" better than NO journalism -- in a way that doesn't feel hectoring or pandering. Very good.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"status":"submit"},"rshields37@gmail.com":{"2654":{"comments":"Another contender, rich in detail and sourcing, colorful writing and an intriguing look at a reinvention.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"2831":{"comments":"I absoutely love this piece, relatable (we all play!) and love the look behind the curtain and also the future of digital news publishing.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3307":{"comments":"Epic, breathtaking and illuminating. What a prize-winning profile should be.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3347":{"comments":"Standard fare","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":1}},"3349":{"comments":"Just ok, could have been deeper.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3475":{"comments":"Full of details, lots of shoe-leather quotes, witty turns of phrase, this is most certainly a contender.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3481":{"comments":"Interesting profile, but just that","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3580":{"comments":"Big, epic magazine journalism, with juicy quotes. Makes a giant subject understandable and human. Terrific all around.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3618":{"comments":"Robert Thompson Alert! A perfectly fine profile but it's no \"Frank Sinatra Has a Cold\" ... ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3688":{"comments":"A solid roundup of the Dumpster fire that is X but no original reporting it seems.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3692":{"comments":"A nice profile but nothing more.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3694":{"comments":"More commentary than profile. Enjoyable read that left me wanting more.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3704":{"comments":"I wanted to like this more. Sirota could be considered Gatsbyesqe, but this seemed like a surface-deep profile. Fine for what it is but not deep enough for an award","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3715":{"comments":"Florida man, indeed. Well written, researched, framing the dire news situation in Florida plus a brazen main character who'll say anything. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"status":"submit"},"djspiegel@gmail.com":{"2838":{"comments":"A nice piece. I don't love that it only exists to promote Swisher's book, so she grants access to a reporter she doesn't mind spending a lot of time with. I have no problem with stories that do this, but it's hard to compare them to profiles of people who DON'T necessarily want to be profiled but need to be (like the Lara Logan profile - look at how that reporter tracked her down). ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":2,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3377":{"comments":"Riveting. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3394":{"comments":"Enticing, but a story about some hollywood gossip reporters can't compete in this category. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3405":{"comments":"Doesn't seem to fit the category. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":1,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3424":{"comments":"A bit of an abrupt ending? or did they leave out a page? Maybe because it was written so soon after Gershkovich was arrested it's lacking more reporting about why this happened to him specifically. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3437":{"comments":"just. so. boring. the author utterly fails to convince me why i should care about this thing that happened fifty years ago happening slightly differently than everyone thought, but the guy who it happened to is dead now. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":1,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3475":{"comments":"long and meandering. and long. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":1}},"3485":{"comments":"Fascinating look at the inner feelings of a usually anonymous type of person. Not the #1 piece i've judged, but it's very good. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3504":{"comments":"More of a business profile than media or journalism. Doesn't feel that different from most pieces about celebrity entrepreneurs. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3573":{"comments":"This is awful. Is Beau coming to Tucker Carlson's defense or trying to take his place? Lots of speculation without any actual reporting; a weakly presented attempt to gin up conspiracy theories over the Dominion fallout. Also, Epoch TV and Epoch times is known to have lax journalistic standards and a far-right bias, trafficking in conspiracy theories including QAnon, 2020 Presidential Election fraud, and anti-vax. If we're trying to honor journalistic integrity with these awards, this is the opposite of that. Stay away. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":0,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":0,"Framing of the issue: ":0}},"3580":{"comments":"I remember this piece well from when it was first published. Great detail and insight into Zaslav's deepest motivations. But is it too much about the entertainment industry and not enough about journalism to merit a mirror award? Also, if the Chris Licht story referenced in this piece is also nominated in this category, that should be our winner. I mean, a profile that literally lost someone in the media his job? Gotta be the gold standard. This one's good, too, but Zaslav's still very much employed. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3618":{"comments":"A bit vanilla. Do you get Mirror Awards bonus points for using Robert Thompson? ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3694":{"comments":"Feels more like a history lesson than a profile. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3704":{"comments":"Nice piece, illuminating someone not so well known. And the broader issue - that it's important for the media to tell stories even if they can't fit into the two-party system neatly - is an interesting one. \n","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"status":"submit"},"aegallag@syr.edu":{"2831":{"comments":"Fun and thorough profile that covers personalities, process and business angles. Great read. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3394":{"comments":"Pretty standard VF treatment. The two quotes critical of The Ankler are also blind. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3405":{"comments":"Important and weighty but somewhat inacessible. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3408":{"comments":"Just give this story the trophy right now. A richly reported story of a network in crisis with all the juicy details and incredible scenes you could want. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3437":{"comments":"This story is fascinating and well reported. However, it doesn't really fit in the category. It's sort of a profile of Ellsberg (I guess), but really a behind-the-scenes of an event. Recommending it be moved to Higgens.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":1,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4}},"3471":{"comments":"Pretty straightforward in its approach and what it's saying. I feel like I've read this before...","scores":{"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Excellence of craft:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3485":{"comments":"This story is great for its perspective in that we don't often hear from sources about why they decide to be sources. I'm not sure this source is the best spokesperson for that, but maybe that's the point? ","scores":{"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":3,"Excellence of craft:":4}},"3487":{"comments":"Such fun to read. Critiques the pay-to-play aspect of this weird corner of sports reporting. Wish more people were on the record, but that adds to the level of power these people have when they shouldn't. ","scores":{"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Excellence of craft:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3497":{"comments":"More of a business story than a media story. Gets into Meta's stalled growth and changes in audience use of social, but not enough to get me interested. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"3504":{"comments":"A profile of a media star, but not a media story. This is about private equity. ","scores":{"Framing of the issue: ":0,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Excellence of craft:":2}},"3564":{"comments":"An unlikely subject for a profile but perfect for CJR. The issue of journalism and digital security is just going to grow, even though few journalists will have these kinds of services available to them. Compelling writing. Clear explanations of complicated technical events. Relies heavily on Sandvik. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3618":{"comments":"Well rounded profile that is honest about who Watters is without treating him as a lunatic. Explains his appeal and his dangers. Almost too nice to him? Quotes Bob Thompson as an expert. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3620":{"comments":"Aggregates a lot of other reporting to make the argument that this person is not who she says she is. More research than reporting. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3692":{"comments":"Lots of cliches. Puffy profile of a sports broadcaster and not much else. ","scores":{"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":1,"Excellence of craft:":1}},"status":"submit"},"kevin.w.sajdak@gmail.com":{"2654":{"comments":"Good piece. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3307":{"comments":"I enjoyed this piece a lot. It provided a detailed, yet balanced, view and history of a trailblazer in journalism. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3377":{"comments":"Thoughtful and nuanced, this was a great piece.  ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3408":{"comments":"If journalism still holds to account powerful people, this does just that. Fantastic piece. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3424":{"comments":"Good, touching piece, but nothing extraordinary. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3459":{"comments":"Fine explainer, but nothing special. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3481":{"comments":"In true New Yorker style, this piece was great. I would have liked it to go a bit deeper into Candace's motivations, however. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3497":{"comments":"Fine piece. But was clearly pitched by Meta's PR team. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":2,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3500":{"comments":"Well researched and well framed. Balanced, and speaks well about the issues facing creatives in Hollywood. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3502":{"comments":"Very approachable, interesting topic, and good reporting.  Solid, but not extraordinary.  ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3620":{"comments":"Very solid piece. Good reporting. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3690":{"comments":"This piece seemed a little too meandering for me. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3694":{"comments":"Good all around. This piece taught me a lot about a medium, its history, challenges and opportunities. Well thought out and researched. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3704":{"comments":"I enjoyed this piece and found it insightful. I learned a lot and thought it was approachable.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"status":"submit"},"csbrody@syr.edu":{"2640":{"comments":"Straightforward read, well reported, but didn't pop out at me.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"2838":{"comments":"Detailed story-telling, easy to read, great interviews throughout.\n\n\"For most of our conversation at her home, she wears her signature aviator sunglasses until it\u2019s dark enough that she gets up to turn on a lamp. (She has an eye condition that causes sensitivity to light. \u201cThe aviators are a brand thing; the dark glasses are not,\u201d she explains.)\"","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3377":{"comments":"Powerful, heart-breaking piece.  I also think Calabro handled the sensitive parts of Logan's story in a very professional way. Impressive reporting fro Calabro especially breaking through to get to interview Logan.\n\n\"In recent years, many Americans have embraced conspiracy theories as a way to give order and meaning to the world\u2019s chance cruelties. Lara Logan seems to have done the same, rewriting her story as a martyrdom epic in the war of narratives. Five years after Logan departed CBS, few tethers remain to the woman on the projector screen. Executives and journal- ists who were once her greatest advocates have long since stopped talking to her and would prefer not to talk about her, either. \u201cRespectfully, I would like to pass speak- ing on this subject. Best wishes,\u201d Dan Rather wrote in a Twitter message when I reached out to him.\"","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3420":{"comments":"Well-written, wish there were more interviews throughout (and longer), but I loved how Christopher is highlighting the concept of stunt philanthropy. \"Some detractors believe Sai is a fame-hungry braggart exemplifying everything that\u2019s wrong with influencer culture and what happens when philanthropy is reduced to a spectacle, with the poor used as props for views.\"\n","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3459":{"comments":"The reporting felt basic and there weren't any interviews--fell flat to me.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3463":{"comments":"Well-written, and clearly very well-reported (they claimed to interview 12 former employees in the piece), but that's why it fell flat to me since they all were anonymous. ","scores":{"Framing of the issue: ":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Excellence of craft:":3}},"3471":{"comments":"This was a great, easy read--I like how it was broken up. I wish there were more interviews with other people other than just the four women which is why I dropped the \"excellence of craft\" to 4. \n\n\u201cIt is your voice on the radio, your face on TV,\u201d Marrapodi said. \u201cWhere you are coming from is going to be obvious to the listener, and that\u2019s something we can\u2019t run away from. Who we are plays into how we tell the story.\u201d\nSummers wasn\u2019t always comfortable using her lived experience in her reporting, especially coming from a background where she was covering politics.\n\u201cWe are conditioned to leave our identities and leave the fullness of ourselves on the sidelines in a way that I don\u2019t think is always actually conducive to the reporting,\u201d she said.\n\nOliver described what she calls \u201cNPR voice\u201d \u2014 a low register, stripped of any regional dialects, that registers as white and male \u2014 as the prevailing sound of NPR. Rascoe, she said, is a disruption to that.\n\u201cFor decades, listeners have been accustomed to a particular kind of NPR voice. You can run through the dial and figure out when you\u2019ve landed on an NPR member station,\u201d Oliver said.\nHearing a voice like Rascoe\u2019s \u201cis a definite change in direction, and is exactly the kind of voice NPR wants to bring to the air,\u201d Oliver said. \u201cThis is part of the real world. People speak differently. People have different regional accents. People use different kinds of colloquialisms. NPR is trying to sound more like the real world now.\u201d","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3475":{"comments":"I preferred the NYMag story about Risa Heller to this one, but I do think there's great reporting and writing in this.\n\"Now, Tucker\u2019s journalistic rivals have rallied around her. 'She has handled a difficult situation with urgency and confidence,' says Joe Kahn, executive editor of the New York Times. 'Emma has also done one of the most important things an editor can do in a terrible situation like this, using good journalism and a powerful platform to keep the injustice front and center in people\u2019s minds.'","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3477":{"comments":"I loved this piece. Phenomenal reporting, so many wonderful stories from various sources. Great writing. And one of the better pieces I've read about PR and the role of a publicist in the industry--especially crisis comms.\n\n\"Journalism is about finding out the truth, but it\u2019s often played like a game, one in which the most interesting story with the juiciest and most convincing details wins. Heller understands what a reporter needs. As Evan Smith put it to me: 'It\u2019s like what they say about the Devil \u2014 the greatest trick Risa ever pulled was convincing us that she\u2019s one of us.'\"\n\nHeller has made a sport of befriending journalists. \u201cShe will go toe to toe with a reporter, kick their ass, yell at their editor, and then be invited to be the godmother of their child, and I\u2019m only exaggerating a little bit,\u201d says Heller\u2019s friend Jonathan Rosen, co-founder of rival communications firm BerlinRosen. \u201cI\u2019ve often wondered how she does this.\u201d\n\nCrisis comms can be amoral work. I ask Heller how she decides whether to take on clients. \u201cI believe generally people deserve to have their story told,\u201d she says. Everyone has a right to an attorney, but should everyone have the right to the ministrations of a spin doctor? \u201cPeople come to me at their lowest moments and say, \u2018I need your help.\u2019 I listen to them, I see if there\u2019s a way for us to help them, and if there is, if I think there\u2019s a story to tell, I\u2019ll do it. If I don\u2019t think there\u2019s a story to tell, I don\u2019t do it. I use my gut.\u201d","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3487":{"comments":"I thought this was absolutely fascinating, and I wouldn't read anything about sports unless you made me do it. Admittedly it took me a bit longer to read this because I found so much of it confusing, but that is because I really don't know anything about sports which is why I'm giving it a 3 for intended audience since I don't think the average Washington Post reader is a sports expert (at least I don't think they are), but I though it was fast-paced and well-written. I also think it touches on the an important and timely topic of how reporters use social for scoops\/confirmations. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":4,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3497":{"comments":"I loved this piece. Again, for this piece, I would have even read more because of Hinchliffe's story-telling. Her interview with Mendelsohn was beautifully woven through the story. For the framing of the issue, I really thought this was powerful and something that feels so timely right now: \"Mendelsohn says her dedication to Facebook was less about furthering her career and more about advancing the company\u2019s mission. For the ultimate people person, the possibilities that come with reaching 3 billion people each day were hard to give up. She\u2019s a true believer in the good that can come from connecting people, a throwback to the earliest days of social media before the risks\u2014fast-moving misinformation, the spread of hate speech\u2014became clear.\" It's a well-done profile about someone I knew nothing about, and I understand why she made the choices she made in her career, even to essentially not take time off during her cancer diagnosis. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3500":{"comments":"I liked this one more than the NYT profile (even though they didn't get to interview Zaslav in this piece) simply because I thought it was more interesting and better writing, but the \"Appropriateness for the intended audience\" and the \"Framing of the issue\" was the same for me in this piece as NYT.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3564":{"comments":"I loved reading this piece--I even wanted it to be longer. Great story-telling and reporting throughout. I liked the writer's use of \"I\" throughout, too. ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3580":{"comments":"Well reported piece, but I wish there was more storytelling throughout vs. reporting. It's well-written, but it didn't suck me in. I also don't feel like it touches on the media and its role in society,","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":2,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"status":"submit"},"horose@syr.edu":{"2640":{"comments":"I am a former colleague and friend of Susan Iger, his first wife...","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":0,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":0,"Framing of the issue: ":0}},"2654":{"comments":"\n\n\nClosing thoughts...pedestrian writing\n\n\"The rules of publishing\u2014the same ones that not long ago crashed a Goop deal\u2014may no longer apply. Sponsored content appears all over, including in award-winning magazines, and, as social media becomes a less reliable source of traffic, many publishers have grown increasingly desperate for points of connection with readers. Carter thinks there still remains a place for print. \u201cNothing produced electronically can match the sheer joy of leafing through a great magazine and then sitting down and reading it,\u201d he told me. \u201cI do think magazines will have to get more magazine-y, in the words of a former Vanity Fair publisher. This means better-quality paper and greater attention to images and storytelling.\u201d He added, \u201cThe cycle of life for magazines may well follow that of vinyl. Fewer, higher-quality in terms of heft and look, and specialized.\u201d\n\nWhether or not Air Mail presents a viable new business model for magazines, it has, at minimum, kept Carter in their midst. \u201cIt\u2019s not about keeping busy so much as continuing life as a journalist\u2014which is pretty much all I know,\u201d he said. \u201cAnd it\u2019s something I love. Also, I wanted to create another office family. Which Alessandra and I have done.\u201d\n\n","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":2,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3307":{"comments":"\"Over a 26-year career at SI, Kraft wrote deeply reported and immersive features, just like her male colleagues. All the while, she quietly racked up an unrivaled collection of firsts. She was the first woman to race in a major dogsled event in Alaska, the first woman and first foreign journalist to hunt with General Francisco Franco of Spain, and likely the only mother of four to take down Big Five game animals across six continents. Yet despite the enduring reputation enjoyed by her male contemporaries at SI \u2014 including George Plimpton, Frank Deford, and Roy Blount Jr. \u2014 her work has since faded into obscurity. \"","scores":{"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4,"Excellence of craft:":5}},"3347":{"comments":"can skip, even with perfect score, likely won't rise to top - RC \nPlease enter zeros if skipping ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":0,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":0,"Framing of the issue: ":0}},"3349":{"comments":"Must recuse myself, having worked for 60 Minutes at times...and CBS News for 30 years.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":0,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":0,"Framing of the issue: ":0}},"3394":{"comments":"can skip, even with perfect score, likely won't rise to top - RC \nPlease enter zeros if skipping ","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":0,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":0,"Framing of the issue: ":0}},"3405":{"comments":"favorite passage.\n\n\"Financial incentives also exist at smaller online outlets that rely on Chinese social-networking apps like WeChat for readers and advertising. An editor at an online Chinese-language outlet in Singapore admitted to self-censorship \u2014 avoiding political topics while pushing messaging that would be favorable to China \u2014 to preserve access to the app. Getting blocked is a \u201cdouble cut,\u201d the editor said, affecting both readership and advertising. Lianhe Zaobao\u2019s editor, Goh Sin Teck, in response to questions from The Post, said that his newspaper is \u201cobjective, neutral and fact-based\u201d and that content is not selected based on political leanings. The opinion section, Goh added, is meant to cover \u201ca broad spectrum of views,\u201d and the paper does not \u201cwant to discard certain views out of hand solely based on the columnist\u2019s background.\u201d The newspaper\u2019s official positions, he said, are carried only in its editorials. \"","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3408":{"comments":"What a fantastic read...\n\n'Favorite\" excerpt:\n\n\"One year into the job, Licht was losing both battles. Ratings, in decline since Trump left office, had dropped to new lows. Employee morale was even worse. A feeling of dread saturated the company. Licht had accepted the position with ambitions to rehabilitate the entire news industry, telling his peers that Trump had broken the mainstream media and that his goal was to do nothing less than \u201csave journalism.\u201d\n\nGreat, brave writing all around. I felt like I was there, across his desk.","scores":{"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":4,"Excellence of craft:":4,"Framing of the issue: ":4}},"3420":{"comments":"The decent story about India's version of \"Mr. Beast\"...but not right for this competition.\n\nNice feature well written of a web phenom.","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":3,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3}},"3424":{"comments":"\nTHE WINNER: \n\n\nFelt like I was watching a \"Jason Bourne in Russia\" film. I was seated in an office reading this incredible, sad story of a REAL journalist overpowered in Putin's Russia, and made you want to pray for him and his safety (I'm not \"evangelical\" at all, but he needs help, desperately .\n\nCinematic, incredible intelligent storytelling. Best excerpt for me, in several pages of fantastic storytelling...\n\nFavorite passages:\n\n\"In one assignment, Mr. Gershkovich was followed by several Russian security officers, some of whom recorded his movements with a camera and pressured sources to not talk to him. He assumed his phone was monitored. On another trip, to the western region of Pskov, he was followed and filmed by unidentified men.\n\nOn Wednesday, when he traveled to Yekaterinburg, a Urals city nearly 900 miles east from Moscow, Mr. Gershkovich\u2019s phone, like those of many Journal foreign correspondents, was loaded with a GPS tracking app that enabled colleagues to see his movements. \"\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\u201cLanded, out the airport,\u201d he wrote at 1:59 p.m.\n\nThomas Grove, a longtime Russia reporter for the Journal, now covering Poland, was on his way to a Warsaw dinner when he noticed Evan hadn\u2019t texted him for hours. He texted a Journal security manager at 7:12 p.m., \u201cHave you been in touch with Evan?\u201d\n\n\u201cWorking on it.\u201d\n\n\u201cPhone is off....\"","scores":{"Excellence of craft:":5,"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":5,"Framing of the issue: ":5}},"3500":{"comments":"What a great and sad tale of Zaslav, a titan who has a tiny heart the size of the Grinch before he saw them sing in Whoville.\n\nThis is a great story that belongs with a different competition given its huge degree of financial dealings.\n\nFavorite passage:\n\n\"WBD faces these overlapping crises while still paying off the $55 billion in debt that the company took on in the merger, a downstream effect of the 2018 takeover of Time Warner by AT&T (a disaster of a deal that has been called the worst merger in corporate history).\n\n\"It\u2019s easy to see why Zaslav, known for gutting TV networks and rebuilding them to his specs, was seen as the cost-cutting and culture-shifting man for the job at WBD. The CEO\u2014who has lately battled writers and actors over the studios\u2019 ability to replace them with AI\u2014made it big during the reality TV boom, another flash point in the ongoing battle over the value of human creative labor. During his 15-year tenure as CEO of Discovery Inc., Zaslav expanded the output of inexpensive unscripted TV, including explosively popular titles such as Dr. Pimple Popper and Naked and Afraid. The content Zaslav helped usher in at Discovery wasn\u2019t glamorous, but it did print money, contributing to the company\u2019s revenue growth, from less than $1 billion when Zaslav took charge to more than $12 billion in 2021.\"\n\n","scores":{"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":3,"Excellence of craft:":4}},"3504":{"comments":"Heavy on equity and investments...NOT journalism reporting for the most part!  Therefore, the zeros.\n\n\n\n\"Such success could cement Kardashian\u2019s own legacy as a trendsetter and skilled operator who can apply her business sense beyond herself. All eyes will be on SKKY\u2019s first investment. \u201cPeople will really understand that this is a serious fund,\u201d Kardashian says. SKKY could be a pinnacle of sorts\u2014the culmination of the good and the bad, the highbrow and the tabloid fodder. \u201cYou definitely can see an evolution of the type of business that I\u2019ve been involved in,\u201d Kardashian says. \u201cI\u2019ve been through it all.\u201d ","scores":{"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":0,"Excellence of craft:":0,"Framing of the issue: ":0}},"3690":{"comments":"\n\"Musk\u2019s actions have made it clear why this unprecedented accumulation of power is so dangerous. Because he controls global connectivity from a position of zero public accountability, his \u201cmogul\u2019s whim\u201d is the sole basis on which this essential service is distributed in emerging tech markets. Over and over, Musk has deployed this power clumsily, incoherently, and dangerously.\"","scores":{"Appropriateness for the intended audience:":3,"Excellence of craft:":3,"Framing of the issue: ":2}},"status":"submit"}}},"final_voting":{"higgins_final":{"bstelter@gmail.com":{"3469":{"comments":"","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}},"3609":{"comments":"this piece contains more original reporting about dominion\/fox than the wash post piece","scores":{"Overall Score ":5}},"3667":{"comments":"absolutely top-notch reporting ","scores":{"Overall Score ":5}},"3723":{"comments":"","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}},"status":"save"},"tbreton@cox.net":{"status":"submit","3469":{"comments":"This is such a well-written in-depth profile and there was clearly investigative reporting involved, particularly in the first part of the story that dealt with Musk and Ukraine. I'm thinking though that this story is in the wrong category for this contest and should be a finalist for best in-depth profile. ","scores":{"Overall Score ":5}},"3609":{"comments":"Excellent investigative reporting and narrative storytelling. I felt like I was in the  courthouse when this settlement agreement was hashed out. I was not bothered by the anonymous sourcing. There were at least 10 people who led the Times reporters through the settlement decision-making.  The stories used both publicly filed and redacted court filings. The one the reporters  obtained (from a confidential source) of a text from Tucker Carlson was crucial in the settlement and his firing. Rarely do reporters get people involved in settlement negotiations to share so much behind-the-scenes, confidential material.  These stories taught readers about the legal system and showed them how badly Fox misjudged its chances of winning Dominion's lawsuit and what it would cost them in dollars and reputation. ","scores":{"Overall Score ":5}},"3667":{"comments":"This is such an outrage and a really important piece of investigative reporting. The radio piece was excellent and easy to understand. The print piece was so convoluted and choppy that I got lost in the weeds, even after reading sections of it multiple times.  The poor writing and presentation of material made the story seem less outrageous than it is.  It needed a better editor!  ","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}},"3723":{"comments":"While the emails are eye-popping and so revelatory, I don't see this entry being a piece of investigative reporting. Reporters assigned to cover a high-profile case like this routinely check the court file daily for papers filed by both sides.  It's a very solid piece of court reporting and well-written but doesn't belong in this category.  It does not seem that there was any sleuthing involved in the reporting of this story nor any interviews conducted except for a very brief one with a legal expert unconnected to the case who was asked for comment.  Much of the entry is a string of verbatim emails.   I was fascinated by the \"wackadoodle\" email yet can't believe that any reporter\/commentator believed a word that the author wrote  -- or anything that Sidney Powell said based on the email -- or that anyone would give airtime to their claims without checking things further.  The Fox reporters\/commentators privately doubted what was alleged but aired lies just to please a pro-Trump audience????  That certainly is very damning and very important for the public to know but I don't think this story merits the top prize.  ","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}}},"dmrubin@syr.edu":{"status":"submit","3469":{"comments":"This is the clear winner in the category, in my view.  I read it when it came out in August and much of it stuck with me.  Farrow has a talent for honing in on telling details, such as Musk designing into his self-driving car the feature of rolling through stop signs (because people do it, too).  The fact that Musk's personal wealth dwarfs that of the entire OSHA budget is another fact that reveals much, given that OSHA tries to regulate his business environment.  While the Dominion libel suit is a very, very important story, Musk's impact on the world is even more important.  As Farrow points out, he likes to monopolize areas in which the government is not competing, such as space rockets.  Then the government becomes dependent on him, for space travel or internet connectivity in Ukraine.  Now, as Farrow suggests, he is trying it with AI, and if he succeeds, it's bad for all of us.  It's scary that this damaged man has so much control over segments of American society.  Farrow did a great service with this profile.  It is well written and thoroughly reported.  It's The New Yorker at its best, which is very good.","scores":{"Overall Score ":5}},"3609":{"comments":"I have rated this series with the same #4 as the above series from the Post.  But this one is a bit more impressive because there is more original reporting in it about how Fox miscalculated in forming its defense in the Dominion libel suit.  The reporters had sources willing to provide insight into the negotiations about a settlement.  The Post series (above) was based on documents produced in discovery.  This series has more original reporting.  The information on Dinh is devastating, as it is on Murdoch's decision-making.  It also explains why Fox fired Carlson so quickly.  The memo he wrote about how \"white men fight\" captured a lot of attention.  Similar to the Post series, it is well written and quite entertaining.  The two series together provide all one needs to know about the bad behavior of Fox News, and why it will have to settle the other suits it faces.  If we could bestow the Mirror Award to both of them, as an entry, I would support that.  (However, as you will see below, I prefer a different entry for the top prize.)","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}},"3667":{"comments":"In a year with weaker entries, this NPR piece might have been a prize winner.  But in this field of four, I find it to be the weakest.  Folkenflick did bring to the fore the political pressures on West Virginia Public Radio.  He did good work showing the links between the management of the NPR station and the administration of Governor Justice, who is now running for Senate.  But there is a lot more I wanted to know.  For example, Amelia Knisely disappears from the story after the lead.  What it is she found out and reported about the treatment of people with disabilities?  Why was the state agency so defensive and so anxious to get her fired?  What other stories did West Virginia officials try to kill at the station?  ","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}},"3723":{"comments":"Reporters did a solid job of digging through the e-mails and documents produced in discovery for the Dominion lawsuit against Fox News.  The organization of the series is logical and the writing is clear.  The series is valuable for what it reveals about the mindset of the Fox \"journalists\" and prime time entertainers.  I would have liked to know more about some of the figures not well known to the public, such as Irene Briganti, Meade Cooper and others.  The piece is similar in value and impact to the entry from the Times in this category about the libel suit.  This series is devastating to the reputations of Sydney Powell and Tucker Carlson.  It also adds much to our understanding of the role Fox News and Murdoch played in the Big Lie about the 2020 election and the attempted coup by Trump.","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}}},"dorian@teemingmedia.com":{"status":"submit","3469":{"comments":"A well-reported profile of Elon Musk that includes strong investigative details and clear sourcing. The problem is that the piece isn\u2019t focused on the media industry \u2014 a requirement specified in the award description \u2014 but rather centered more on Musk\u2019s satellite and space companies, and governmental entities\u2019 discomfort in dealing with Musk due to their reliance on those two companies.","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}},"3609":{"comments":"Excellent investigative pieces, based on multiple interviews and materials not publicly available from the Dominion lawsuit against Fox. Well written, edited and assembled to put the reporting  in the context of the case, what occurred publicly (including on air), and behind the scenes. \n","scores":{"Overall Score ":5}},"3667":{"comments":"Well-reported story on apparent corruption at a local NPR news org. The story \u2014 especially the text-based version \u2014 can be a bit hard to follow. Is an important portrayal of heavy handed political involvement in the workings of a prominent local news organization.","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}},"3723":{"comments":"Three pieces that provide a great roundup of Dominion vs. Fox case files tied to what happened on air, with solid explanations of the players and their roles.","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}}},"andyabrahams86@gmail.com":{"status":"submit","3469":{"comments":"As I read through Farrow's piece, I kept wondering why this was even nominated for awards given out for reporting on the media industry. It's a worthy, exhaustive (and occasionally exhausting) profile of Musk the businessman. Yes, he does preside over X, but this mostly deals with Space X and Tesla. Is this a Higgins nominee because Musk is such an outsized presence and the object of media fascination, and it's a long New Yorker piece? I guess so, but the story itself doesn't seem to be an exploration of the industry or Musk's role in the media in any significant way.\n\nBut even on its merits as a Ronan Farrow story, which are usually deeply reported with original sources, a good portion of Musk's bio seems to have been mined from other sources, some already well known (like in Walter Isaacson's biography of Musk). ","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}},"3609":{"comments":"This is stronger than the Post series as it digs further into the legal strategies within FOX to fend off the Dominion suit and the hubris of the company that they would not get to the discovery process, which was so damaging with text messages, etc. The reporting also laid bare how little FOX seemed to care about even trying to stand up any of it's election fraud allegations, as Judge Davis ruled when he said they didn't do any \"good faith, disinterested reporting\" about the segments at the center of the suit. ","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}},"3667":{"comments":"I have a feeling I'll be the outlier here in voting for this as the winner. But  I was happy to see a balanced, well-reported story outside of the New York\/Beltway media worlds. In a much smaller media ecosytem with dwindling news sources, Folkenflik's piece carefully lays out how antagonistic state leaders are to reporting  like Amelia Ferrell Knisely's story that exposes wrongdoing under a less-than-watchful state agency. \n\n  I also thought that while the story deals specifically with West Virginia public broadcasting, the creep of hard-right Republican legislatures in other states must be exerting the same kind of antagonism towards independent journalism, free of statehouse interference. Yes, public broadcasting funding has long been a target of the right but it's interesting to read how, in a smaller market like West Virginia, a CEO like  \"Butch\" Antolini seems to have no qualms about crossing over into the reporting and newsgathering side of his business. \n\nAn excellent case study of how, from the top down, independent reporting in one of the news deserts in this country becomes a target for govt. leaders and even news executives like Antolini who don't like what they hear.","scores":{"Overall Score ":5}},"3723":{"comments":"I'm a bit \"FOXed-out\" on media reporting about FOX, especially after we awarded Higgins to the Times last year for their Tucker Carlson series. But this is a solid series worthy of consideration for diagramming the lengths to which FOX on-air personalities went to perpetuate the election lies.","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}}},"jmaxrobins@gmail.com":{"status":"submit","3469":{"comments":"This comprehensive look at  Elon Musk and the staggeringly powerful empire he lords over was a revelation for me.  This investigative profile of the richest person in the world and the influence he wields is easily the best of the entries in this category.","scores":{"Overall Score ":5}},"3609":{"comments":"Comprehensive, clearly presented and a well-written series on the Fox News\/Dominion suit.   It's what the New York Times so often does so well.","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}},"3667":{"comments":"Kudos to taking a look inside of what happens inside a public radio station and how powerful self-interest look to derail investigative reporting. That being said, I found the investigative piece's narrative  at times hard to follow and keep all the players straight. ","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}},"3723":{"comments":"Underwhelmed.  Didn't add much new to a well-covered story elsewhere.","scores":{"Overall Score ":2}}}},"special_category_2_final":{"bstelter@gmail.com":{"2840":{"comments":"very strong reporting, and there's a strong case for going with 1 individual instead of the group of NYT reporters ","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}},"3444":{"comments":"powerful use of audio clips, but i didn't learn a tremendous amount ","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}},"3601":{"comments":"thought-provoking and revealing work! ","scores":{"Overall Score ":5}},"status":"submit"},"tbreton@cox.net":{"status":"submit","2840":{"comments":"The author examines very important topics relating to media coverage of political issues and war.  I would have scored this a 5 if there had been more interviewing  done for the first two stories and those stories hadn't  been based solely on the Slack messages and emails.  Was anyone else bothered by the fact that none of the editors were named in the first story or that no one from outside the New York Times -- a journalism ethics professor, for example -- was interviewed about what happened to Hughes? And that just about everyone quoted was anonymous? \nI think most reporters would agree that Hughes should have been forced to resign given the two incidents cited in the story, even though the way the situation was handled may have deprived her of her due process rights under the Guild contract.  I'm also wondering why Klein felt it necessary to include Hughes' race and sexual orientation in the story; neither had anything to do with her losing her job.   \nMost of the first story was a  rehash of already reported material. \nThe Q & A with Trey Yingst was fabulous.  In the interview, we  parachute into Yingst's  world as he works to provide on-the-ground  reports from Israel and Gaza, learn about  the lengths he goes to as he attempts to accurately report about the conflict,  and see the toll his job takes on him. The details he provides about the atrocities he's observed,  his network of sources and how he tries to care for his mental and physical health give the reader a true feel for what it is like to be a reporter covering this war. That said, this was a verbatim transcript of their conversation, not a story.  I'm not sure whether a Q & A qualifies for a story in this contest. ","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}},"3444":{"comments":"I loved this podcast.  Great interviews, great narrative storytelling. The story was meticulously researched and exposed so many problems the media faces covering this war as well as the problems with the accuracy of the reporting. The podcast made great use of taped comments from journalists and politicians.  The mix of sound and voice was riveting.  ","scores":{"Overall Score ":5}},"3601":{"comments":"Solid, well-researched and well-organized  pieces but I did not find anything surprising here except the information about the huge rise in Fox viewership among   Jewish liberals who would have never tuned into Fox before. ","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}}},"dmrubin@syr.edu":{"status":"submit","2840":{"comments":"This would have been a better entry without the third piece, in which Klein does a Q&A with Yingst.  I am no fan of the Q&A format.  I think it's a lazy way for a writer to produce a piece.  I found Yingst to be a blowhard, telling us at great length how long he's been in the region, how many great sources he has on both sides, how hard he works, etc.  Perhaps.  Who knows?  But I found precious little of real value or media criticism in it.  For example, she might have asked him if his bosses want a pro-Israel tilt to the coverage (as the one of the NY Times stories suggests).  \n\nThe other two pieces in this three-part entry are of greater value.  I wanted more on the internal division among editors on how to handle the Gaza hospital bombing story, but what she offers is useful.  The sort-of apology from Kahn is revealing.  I credit Klein for getting the Slack traffic.\n\nThe Jazmine Hughes \"resignation\" is also revealing for what it says about the Times's HR practices.  I wish Klein had told us more about Hughes and her past relationship with the Times.  I sense there is a bigger back story to this resignation.  But it does illustrate the old and on-going problem of how far journalists can go to air their personal opinions, and how the Gray Lady tries to stop them.\n\nIf I had to choose between this entry and the Times entry in this category, I tilt slightly to Vanity Fair.  But overall, the entries are weak, particularly Gladstone's.","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}},"3444":{"comments":"Gladstone has done much better media criticism than this piece.  The first 4:40 is vague and general.  I thought that when she addressed the subject of the controversial \"beheaded babies\" it would get better.  But she used it simply to illustrate how hard it is to cover a brutal war like this one.  \"The fog of war\" is a hoary cliche by now.  She underlines what we all know.  But as for pointed media criticism that advances the debate, there is little here.  ","scores":{"Overall Score ":1}},"3601":{"comments":"I found the entries in this category to be disappointing.  I am not excited about any of them.  These three stories from the Times are typical of daily offerings but not particularly illuminating.  \n\nThe story on the internal ethical debate about what images to show readers has been hashed out every time the media are confronted with a gruesome story.  The calculus for the editors making the decisions on what images to show has not changed, and this story doesn't add to that.  \n\nThe second entry on Fox's coverage of the war is of greater value.  Because I am not a Fox viewer, I was not aware of it until I read this story, and others like it, a few months ago.  I am always suspicious of stories that make large pronouncements--in this case about Jews and Fox--on the basis of skimpy anecdotal evidence.  Note it starts with a single person's views and it ends in the Second Avenue Deli with comments from a few customers.  This does not represent Jews, or anything close to it.  \n\nThe third entry, like the first, rehashes an ongoing problem.  Yes, we all know how incoherent, incorrect, inflammatory, unreliable, and often dangerous the information is on social media.  That is surely the case for the Israel-Hamas War.  But, what can be done?  Sadly, nothing.  This Pandora's box of mis-information has long been open.  \n\nIn sum, these pieces are run-of-the-mill Times coverage.  Any other three or six or more of their stories on the war would have been just as good, or better.","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}}},"dorian@teemingmedia.com":{"status":"submit","2840":{"comments":"The piece about the NYTimes' process was well-reported with investigative details. News organizations do make errors in judgement, and the Times in this instance owned up to theirs \u2014 weakening some of the piece\u2019s impact. The story of the firing of the reporter, too, was well-reported, if a bit of inside baseball about a managerial decision for which there was no real smoking gun. The interview  with the foreign correspondent from Fox was one of best I\u2019ve seen in evoking everything from the terror to the obsessions  felt by war reporters. I would give the credit for the poignancy of that piece to the interviewee. ","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}},"3444":{"comments":"A masterfully researched, written and edited report on age-old quandaries for journalists put in the context of the moment. This piece does the best job of the entrants in this category of portraying the challenges of fairly covering Israeli-Palestinian conflict right now. A raft of spot-on examples -- provided through audio that helps convey emotion -- solidly ground mentions of everything from the sweep of history, to poetry, to comedic irony.","scores":{"Overall Score ":5}},"3601":{"comments":"Solid and grounded reporting and observations, all substantiated. Yet, the issues raised, around deciding which imagery to publish and the difficulty of dealing with social media, are not particular to the current Mideast conflict. They can be raised in much the same way for any modern war and some other stories. The piece on Jewish viewers turning to Fox News was solid and well-written, and used what data were available to support its case.","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}}},"andyabrahams86@gmail.com":{"status":"submit","2840":{"comments":"This is my winner in this category. Klein and Vanity Fair kill two birds with one stone in the series by going inside The NY Times to show how the paper's staff has been roiled by their own coverage of the Mideast and also lets  FOX's Trey Yingst describe in his own painfully observed words what reporting is like there now. \n\nThe piece about  Jazmine Hughes resignation might be a little too in the HR\/Guild weeds for a general audience. But Klein obviously has deep sources within the Times and  meticulously recreates the undoubtedly tense and volatile state of the newsroom, at a time when staff there\u2014like many other Americans\u2014have strong views on this war and objectivity might not be front of mind for some at the Times. \n\n\n\n","scores":{"Overall Score ":5}},"3444":{"comments":"Gladstone is eloquent in talking about reporting on the conflict but I didn't hear anything particularly illuminating here. ","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}},"3601":{"comments":"A good series on the different challenges facing both the media and consumers of how reporting during war can get warped and how to interpret information in real time. The story about the reliance on social media and the rise of AI is particularly important. When Imran Ahmed of the Center for Countering Digital Hate is quoted as saying he turned away from the internet for reporting on the conflict and towards the BBC (\"the telly\"), he's expressing the thoughts of many (likely older) viewers and readers who are looking for some port in the storm of the disinformation and\/or outright deception that plays out on social media.","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}}},"jmaxrobins@gmail.com":{"status":"submit","2840":{"comments":"All three parts of  Klein's coverage were interesting, including her look inside turmoil inside the NY Times.  ","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}},"3444":{"comments":"An excellent overview of the singular, fraught difficulties of covering the war in Gaza. ","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}},"3601":{"comments":"A fine series of articles.   In particular, I thought it was interesting to note how Fox News had garnered more Democratic, as well as Jewish viewers with its coverage of the war in Gaza.  ","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}}}},"commentary_final":{"jkkaplan@syr.edu":{"3339":{"comments":"This is an important topic but so densely written that I think the point it is trying to make is lost, and it is also behind a paywall","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}},"3404":{"comments":"Certainly not traditional commentary but closer than any of the other entries; this is well done an interesting and so I gave it my highest mark but disappointed in this category","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}},"3441":{"comments":"This is much more than commentary; it is a well-reported story with just a little commentary; I think it took her too long to get into Joan Rivers and that aspect of it and she somewhat ignores the role of ratings in all of this","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}},"3706":{"comments":"These are really good stories; particularly the first two; but in no way are they commentary; not sure how they ended up in this category","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}},"status":"submit"},"carlson.margaret@gmail.com":{"status":"save","3339":{"comments":"This is commentary. The writer takes us from the penny press to the end of free news, to the assertion that the poor suffer most, with some detours into the elitism of Air Mail with its obsession with the south of France. That's' what's working because it so caters to the people who can pay and the rest can eat cake. Polgreen  galloped along,  balancing information, analysis and attitude. Testing the waters at the Huffington Post lent it a you-are-there element. She was entitled to every swing she took at the folks who got us here. This was far and away the best entry. ","scores":{"Overall Score ":5}},"3404":{"comments":"This would have been so much better without so many voices chit-chatting rather than Loewinger having his guests make their arguments one at a time. Not that it wasn't interesting to hear Ben Smith observe that the Times relied on techies Spotify and Netflix to tee up boom times (although could they really have done it without the games and puzzles and five ways to fix kale?). The coop is rolling a rock uphill but with enough heart left over to play ball. Go team. Have we done radio before in commentary? Brooke Gladstone should never turn over the mike. She's gifted.  ","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}},"3441":{"comments":"Although a lot of hard work went into this piece with a lot of excellent reporting, the writer didn't find the thin piece fighting to emerge from the fat one. There is a lot of evidence to support her headline that the dude gets the desk but she doesn't choose the best evidence and she often hands the commentary part off to someone else. And not  just one quote per person but multiple quotes to support one point. At times, it felt like McFarland  wasn't in charge. Liz Winstead was.  \nOne of her most supportive points came well down in the piece with Joan Rivers as close to the plush seat behind Johnny's desk as any woman had gotten with the expectation she would replace him until she didn't. When she'd lost to Leno, she bailed for Fox and Carson never spoke to her again, because she was supposed to take it like a man. This is where McFarlane turns over her chance to go voice-of God about Rivers career destroyed, her husband-manager dead by suicide , all because men ruled late-night. She hands her authority over to Sarah Silverman for a not particularly insightful take. This would have scored more points in the reporting category. \n\n ","scores":{"Overall Score ":2}},"3706":{"comments":"The profile of Tavis Smiley was the most interesting entry in the group but it doesn't fit under \"capturing the media's remorseless change.\" when the change is only that Smiley's had a mini-comeback since his #MeToo moment. He's emerged better than others but the piece doesn't use his resurrection to say whether his unusual Second Act was a good thing, what it means for #MeToo that's gone quiet, or prospects of resurrection for others. Rainey likes the aptly named Smiley so much he doesn't go there. The death of the local Salinas paper fit all too well under the rubric of \"remorseless change\" given that it's mostly obits and wire copy and reporters fleeing for higher ground.  The media critic turned media saviour who'd going something about the drastic state of affairs is very well drawn, warts and all. So much sadness. He's rolling the same rock uphill that Loewinger's co-op is . You can feel the blood, sweat, and tears of the effort, only without throwing around a ball to let off steam.  I so wish the writer hadn't given his kicker to a stranger, and a cliche about democracy dies in darkness at that. The Washington Post whose tag line that is laid off 240 people shining the light this year.  So much sadness this year, it makes me long for Maddow gone fishin. ","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}}},"rthompso@syr.edu":{"status":"submit","3339":{"comments":"This goes down another road much traveled by, but the 1830's frame offers a nice insight, as does the unifying question of \"how can you make a quality news product for people who [are] never going to pay for news?\"","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}},"3404":{"comments":"These three commentary-adjacent pieces are substantial (a total of 63 minutes of material) primers on their subjects, if not original arguments.  The one on the digital transformation of the  NEW YORK TIMES (\"You know---the company that bought Wordle,\" as one kid says as he legitimizes his attempt to secure a selfie outside the mother ship and accidentally nails the thesis of the story) is the strongest, I think. The entry on podcasts aptly positions the economics of podcasts within the old school model of traditional radio and the \"prestige\" podcast within the ecosystem of more popular genres. \n\n","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}},"3441":{"comments":"This piece most excellently addresses a well-rehearsed grievance. Many have dissertated about the famine of women in late-night, but none have done it as well as this. There's an abundance of data, accurate television history (for a change)...and lots of math!! Go figure. And she manages to get Doug Herzog, former president of Comedy Central and launcher of THE DAILY SHOW, to fess up (out loud),  to some of the mechanisms that put the \"systemic\" in systemic discrimination. But most of all, her research revealed to her the perpetually forgotten Faye Emerson, who hosted the very first late-night show back in 1949 (when only 6000 American homes had a TV set), and about whom she provides us with a bonus drive-by profile. (Herein lies a story: when I brought up Ms. Emerson in an interview conducted by the fancy filmmakers of the six-part documentary series THE STORY OF LATE NIGHT for the fancy news network CNN, they had never heard of her).  Great title, graceful writing, impressive scholarship.    ","scores":{"Overall Score ":5}},"3706":{"comments":"All three stories were interesting and compelling. Two of them (Tavis Smiley, and Santa Cruz's Ken Doctor) seemed more profiles than commentaries.","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}}},"Dorothy.Bland@unt.edu":{"status":"submit","3339":{"comments":"Strong commentary. The author recaps the layoff trends in the industry. Yet, speaks eloquently about concerns about democracy and the fracturing of a nation between those \"who cannot pay - or choose not to\" as well as the underserved and what that means for \"our broken information ecosystem.\" Ultimately, we're all \"poorer for it\" in the author's words. ","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}},"3404":{"comments":"This entry gets my vote for the top entry because of the depth and diversity in the three entries related to the news media.  The first entry chronicles the boom and bust for podcasts ranging from startups such as Serial, the real-life murder mystery, to  Gimlet. The second entry focused on the NY Times digital success. The  third entry focused on the rise of the worker-owned journalism initiatives such as the media-co-ops know as Defector and Hell Gate.  These entries speak to the power of audio and digital engagement on public radio.","scores":{"Overall Score ":5}},"3441":{"comments":"While this is a well-reported and interesting work, it strikes me as more news analysis than commentary It provides a wonderful history lesson on late night TV. I certainly learned a lot about the impact of pioneering actress Faye Emerson  and other women who have hosted late-night TV shows, this didn't quite strike me as fitting in the commentary category. ","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}},"3706":{"comments":"This entry  is well-written and demonstrates strong  reporting chops,  but is better suited for news analysis category.","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}}},"andrew.edgecliffe-johnson@ft.com":{"status":"submit","3339":{"comments":"In an era where subscriptions rule over ad-supported business models, I liked the break with orthodoxy in this column, where Lydia Polgreen laments the shrinking media outlets that \u201csought to make quality news for the masses that cost little to nothing to consume\u201d. We are splitting into news haves and have-nots, she points out, and that has big implications for the future of our country. Creating a shared reality was always the work of mass media.\u201d This is quite a simple point, but I thought she made it well. (Though perhaps with a little too much rehashing of stuff we already knew to be worth a 5.)\n","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}},"3404":{"comments":"Micah Loewinger, for me, offered the most thoughtful insights into the media today. His selection of topics - the bursting of the podcast bubble, the digital dominance of the New York Times and the rise of (never-to-be-dominant) worker-led newsrooms - showed a refreshing curiosity and range. He resists lazy, obvious conclusions to dig into our industry\u2019s contradictions, delivering a well-balanced mix of interviewees, evocative audio and a genuine point of view. ","scores":{"Overall Score ":5}},"3441":{"comments":"I thought Melanie McFarland picked a great subject and dug into it pretty deeply, helped by some strong interviews and historical research going back to Faye Emerson and Joan Rivers. I thought she made a good argument about the need for institutional support (and how rarely female hosts have had this). Structurally, though, I thought this piece flowed a little awkwardly, which is a challenge with a story of this length. Did it really answer the question in its headline?\n","scores":{"Overall Score ":2}},"3706":{"comments":"I thought James Rainey picked good topics, and backed them up with solid reporting. At the end of each story, though, I was left a little frustrated. I wanted him to shake Gannett harder to understand why it had allowed the Salinas Californian to lose its last reporter; I wondered whether anyone reading his account of Ken Doctor\u2019s attempt to irrigate the Santa Cruz \u201cnews desert\u201d would come away with great insights into how replicable this model really is; and I\u2019m not sure I finished his Tavis Smiley story feeling that it was either a revelatory profile or a pointed piece of commentary.\n","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}}},"Merrillbrown02@hotmail.com":{"status":"submit","3339":{"comments":"Smart but not rich enough for a 5. ","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}},"3404":{"comments":"Interesting but not particuarly fresh","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}},"3441":{"comments":"A good read raising good issues.  Would have liked to have heard from some more senior executives\/decision makers. ","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}},"3706":{"comments":"Valuable coverage, good story choices, but commentary? ","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}}}},"profile_final":{"jkkaplan@syr.edu":{"3307":{"comments":"I love every aspect of this story: the subject; the reporting; the writing; the structure; the photos and the pull quotes. This is simply one of the best stories I've read in ages and the author actually re-reports one of the subject's stories. Tremendous all-around.","scores":{"Overall Score ":5}},"3377":{"comments":"This is also a really nicely done piece and it's important given Lara Logan's stature in the journalism profession. Many news consumers--and journalists--wanted to know what happened to her and this story does a nice job of providing some--but not all--of those answers","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}},"3408":{"comments":"This is probably the most famous profile of the year and certainly one with the most repercussions. It is well-written and does what all good profiles do: let's the subject fall on his own sword.  In any other year it would be a winner for me but I just love the Virginia Kraft story more","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}},"3564":{"comments":"Great topic and profile of someone I had never heard about. But the writing is dense and uninspiring; lots of cliches and not much reporting beyond talking to the subject and a clip job","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}},"status":"submit"},"carlson.margaret@gmail.com":{"status":"submit","3307":{"comments":"What a lot of trips to tag along on to realize that Virginia Kraft hunted and fished alone, never throwing out a line to women as she climbed the ladder of outward bound journalism. The closest she got to a woman's group was her fishing bee.  The answer to the question of why we haven't heard of her is that she's an outlier without much to teach anyone who doesn't live on permanent safari. No one got a job at Sports Illustrated because Kraft was a crack shot. Women who've broken through the men-only barrier to cover the Super Bowl didn't get their by playing Pop Warner football. The piece would have been fine as pure profile--Kraft was an interesting and unusual character. But Kraft couldn't bear the weight put on her here. .  ","scores":{"Overall Score ":2}},"3377":{"comments":"I knew Lara Logan had lost her way and now I know how and why.  Calabro traced  the the war reporter from the top of her game to no game at all, spewing her wares to conspiracists in a community hall feasting on her paranoia.  Up the golden escalator to recovery after her father abandoned her to become the It Girl of Sexty Minutes, to being raped in the line of duty,. Down almost as fast after she made a whopper of a mistake she couldn't own up to, except by rejecting the life she had for another where she could convince herself that CBS and the world (even Newsmax wouldn't have her back on) were wrong. The story didn't write itself, Calabro Stephen King'd it. (It's the Atlantic again, killing the competition).  ","scores":{"Overall Score ":5}},"3408":{"comments":"How to cover Trump was not something I stay up at night thinking about, Chris Licht told Tim Alberta at the outset of the piece of the wunderkind taking over CNN. \"It's very simple.\" If  you show a gun in the first act, it's gotta go off in the last. Alberta put the weapon in LIcht's hand and by the end, Licht used it on himself. He gave a relative rookie Kaitlin Collins the job of managing Trump and then packed the panel after with Trumpists, all the while kidding himself that it was out of an effort for fairness, not a effort for his network to recover some of what it had lost. If the suits had absorbed Alberta's piece, MSNBC's Ceasar Conde and Carrie Budoff Brown wouldn't have wooed Ronna McDaniel (nee Trump) to give a new CNN a try.  It was \"very simple\" for Trump. He shot Licht at a CNN town hall and didn't lose one vote. By dissecting that drama like a Netflix series, Alberta wrote the piece that could have saved and be saving others from such folly.  Alberta was already recognized for his prowess  with a National Magazine Award which may argue in favor of recognizing  someone else. (Over to you JK with the bigger picture.) It's not hard to do since  Elaina Calabro on Lara Logan was just as good.  I give Alberta a 4 and the equally spectacular Logan profile a 5.  ","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}},"3564":{"comments":"At first it looked like Mary Retta hunted down the perfect vessel for her profile: the Girl with the Dragon Tattoo who's side gig is pole dancing for a walk through through the hellscape where Amnesty International has a doppleganger and journalists risk exposing confidential sources with a keystroke. But like the profiler who fell in love with Maddow last year when she put on the waders, Retta elevated her subject to nosebleed heights tryng to make her a partof the solution.  Cyber-terror is not going to be solved by readers of CJR giving up \"birthday123\" as a go-to password , or by a gig worker like Ranu, who couldn't keep from being hacked herself. Cybersecurity is like climate change that can't be ameliorated one de-greased pizza box at a time. It's gonna take a village of geniuses with the backing of the U.S. and Norad and the EU. Retta convinced me of the peril but not that Ranu was at the center of it.   ","scores":{"Overall Score ":2}}},"Dorothy.Bland@unt.edu":{"status":"submit","3307":{"comments":"I learned so much in reading this beautiful profile about Virginia Kraft, who was a female sports journalism pioneer. Not only was she a big game hunter, but a wife and mother of four who wore Chanel No. 5. As Sohn writes,  she  was \"a woman who did not fit into simple boxes, and whose career challenged my expectations of what it means to be a pioneer.\" The photos also enhanced and showcased Kraft's tenacity, grit, brilliance and passion for life. What an inspirational story and journey!  ","scores":{"Overall Score ":5}},"3377":{"comments":"This was a fascinating read about Laura Logan's journey from her South African childhood to her rise as an international broadcast correspondent with 60 Minutes then her dramatic unraveling in the years since she was gang-rape while on assignment in Cairo's Tahir Square in 2011. The story is  well researched and filled with wonderful quotes. For example, she once told the Mirror, \"All my life, I've been fighting to prove that I'm not weak.\" After leaving CBS, she moved to Texas and Plott Calabro captures the scene and amazing quotes from Logan speaking to the Gillespie County chapter of Moms for Liberty on Feb. 27, 2023. Calabro pointed out she is wearing a sticker that reads \"STOP WOKE INDOCTRINATION.\" During that speech Logan railed about social media and called COVID vaccines a form of \"genocide by government.\"         ","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}},"3408":{"comments":"This story was appropriately headlined, \"Inside the Meltdown at CNN.\" It took too long to get more of a full view of former CNN CEO  Chris Licht's life and operating style. It rambled too long for this reader.","scores":{"Overall Score ":2}},"3564":{"comments":"This is an intriguing profile about a cybersecurity expert that is a good read with personal details such as her passion for snorkeling with sharks and love of pole dancing.","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}}},"rthompso@syr.edu":{"status":"submit","3307":{"comments":"Everything I know about Virginia Kraft I learned from this profile, and I've spent over half my life at the Newhouse School, which fancies itself the authority on sports journalism.  This piece is not only an important act of historical reclamation, it's also filled with unusually subtle analyses that go way beyond the mere celebration of a woman pioneer.  The details (nanny-raised kids, her conspicuous absence from the group of women in the 1970 Time Inc. lawsuit), the cast (Hemingway, Franco, the Shah, the Gatsby mansion),  the critter body count (I lost track early on when unlucky representatives of seven species succumb in one short sentence) all serve this enigmatic tale of 20th century American journalism. I approached the heft of this profile with trepidation, but by the end I was eagerly speculating about who should play Kraft in the Netflix limited series. ","scores":{"Overall Score ":5}},"3377":{"comments":"Again, a lot of material we've heard before, but there seems to be some benefit in revisiting this career trajectory in 2023.  The updates were interesting, too, especially the story of Logan being played off the stage at the Park Cities Republican Christmas fundraising lunch in Texas. It was notable how many sources refused requests for comment from the author.  My favorite refusal came from Dan Rather: \"Respectfully, I would like to pass speaking on this subject. Best wishes.\" Kind of cheeky for the author to include that, but I'm glad she did.     ","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}},"3408":{"comments":"The Saga of Licht at CNN has been told a lot, but this is perhaps the best single telling I've encountered. The sources are abundant, as was the author's access: he's got quotes that range from behind the scenes at a live airing of the morning show to meetings of the Newhouse board.  With more elegance than much of the reporting on this story, Alberta captures the doomed quixotic incompatibility between  Licht's often-noble motivations to manufacture \"good journalism\" (and he seems to have a fairly honorable idea of what that is) and his profound inability to achieve those motivations in the motley media environment into which he was hired.  ","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}},"3564":{"comments":"A competent profile, and interesting. The subject and the Subject don't seem to be as effectively realized as in the other entries.  ","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}}},"andrew.edgecliffe-johnson@ft.com":{"status":"submit","3307":{"comments":"It\u2019s hard to resist a profile of a character as compelling as Virginia Kraft, who seems from another era but whose story sheds light on our own. Emily Sohn tells the tale at daunting length, but she (or her four editors) structured the (expertly produced) story smartly enough that you keep reading. The narrative is powered by Sohn, herself an \u201cadventure journalist\u201d, setting out to right a wrong - the forgetting of a pioneering female journalist who drank with Hemingway and hunted with Franco - and to shine a light on how, 70 years later, men still dominate so many of the top jobs in journalism. I wasn\u2019t sure that Sohn quite achieved the second of those two goals, or that every one of her personal reflections worked. But I appreciated her realisation that it was better to show the full, flawed complexity of her subject than to get swept up in her more heroic side.\n","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}},"3377":{"comments":"How does a once admired 60 Minutes reporter end up regurgitating conspiracy theories that are too wild for all but the wildest-eyed outlets to broadcast? Elaina Plott Calabro\u2019s profile of Lara Logan\u2019s is an inherently difficult read but there\u2019s a robust clarity to it which seems a potent rejoinder to Logan\u2019s apparent break with reality. Well reported and well written (especially the ending), this haunting profile could be a 5 in another year, but I felt Alberta just had an edge over it. ","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}},"3408":{"comments":"When did a media profile last cause such an impact? When I started reading Tim Alberta\u2019s profile, I confess I had only a vague sense of Chris Licht. When I finished it, I knew everything I needed to know - that Licht was toast. Drawing on months of interviews, Alberta damningly reveals the gulf between the theories Licht brought to CNN and the reality of what was happening on his watch. If this is access journalism, it is access used to brutal effect, revealing Licht\u2019s dwindling patience for \u201cthe Lemon problem\u201d, his shrinking circle of trust and his visible desperation about CNN\u2019s limp ratings. I salute Alberta\u2019s no-nonsense exposure of David Zaslav\u2019s PR tactics. But I would probably give this a five just for the passage on Licht in the gym, bragging \u201cZucker couldn\u2019t do this shit\u201d. \n","scores":{"Overall Score ":5}},"3564":{"comments":"I liked this a lot. Mary Retta picked a compelling character and let her story build, bringing the story of journalism-focused information security consultant Runa Sandvik to life, from her \u201ctranquil Scandinavian directness\u201d and \u201cguarded circumspection\u201d to her letting her hair down while pole dancing. There\u2019s a directness to Retta\u2019s writing, too, as she patiently reveals the scope of the challenge Sandvik has taken on. I feel a bit churlish only giving it a 3 but ultimately I\u2019m not sure Retta\u2019s portrait of Sandvik will stay with me as much as the other profiles on this shortlist.   \n","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}}},"Merrillbrown02@hotmail.com":{"status":"submit","3307":{"comments":"The story, the whole yarn and the presentation all excellent. Fascinating. ","scores":{"Overall Score ":5}},"3377":{"comments":"An astonishing if somewhat unsatisfying story. Maybe because it's just impossible to get ones head around the subject. ","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}},"3408":{"comments":"Great read, real impact. Good reporting that was certainly aided by a overly willing subject. ","scores":{"Overall Score ":5}},"3564":{"comments":"Valuable story, ponderous","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}}}},"special_category_1_final":{"jkkaplan@syr.edu":{"status":"submit","3429":{"comments":"Really excellent article and had a tremendous impact. This is exactly what we were looking for when we created this pop-up category","scores":{"Overall Score ":5}},"3537":{"comments":"This story certainly fits the category but it is also pretty superficial; don't see it as award winning","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}},"3597":{"comments":"This is a great series and I would have no problem giving them this award; it is thoroughly reported and well-written and clearly impactful.\nI just like the idea of giving the Futurism the award because the resources the Times has just dwarfs Futurism","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}}},"hpolskin@gmail.com":{"status":"submit","3429":{"comments":"This is a very strong piece with a powerful (and clever) lead and kicker.  Really spells out the dangers with great concrete examples of how AI is abused by corrupt publishers looking to cut corner.  Key line that I loved: \"Undisclosed AI content is a direct affront to the fabric of media ethics...and a perfect recipe for eroding reader trust.\" Nailed it.  ","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}},"3537":{"comments":"Not particularly well written.  A decent serviceable piece but nothing that stands out.  ","scores":{"Overall Score ":2}},"3597":{"comments":"These three stories were all important, well reported and vital to anyone seeking to understand AI's impact on the content business.  But together it felt a cut below a prize-winning long-form article.   ","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}}},"maryromano556@gmail.com":{"status":"submit","3429":{"comments":"This is a very good scoop. Solid investigative piece that they continually followed up on. Instead of follow the money, the followed the 'fakes.' And they broadened it out, finding other fakes at CNET and Bankrate. ","scores":{"Overall Score ":5}},"3537":{"comments":"perfectly fine 'step-back' story based off the news but not as in-depth as the other candidates. Interesting insight in how some media executives are considering the use of AI.","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}},"3597":{"comments":"Excellent series that thoroughly explained what media, publishing is facing with the changing technology, the rise of AI, and the ever-sophisticated use of deep fakes and disinformation. The fallout for the public could be severe, indeed. This series laid that out vividly, highlighting writers, illustrators, media executives, and others in interviews.","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}}},"mchessher@mail.smu.edu":{"status":"submit","3429":{"comments":"Nice job of telegraphing out this issue beyond one publication and solid reporting, range of sources. ","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}},"3537":{"comments":"This piece lacked the depth and range of both of the other entries. ","scores":{"Overall Score ":2}},"3597":{"comments":"No contest here. The depth and range of this coverage, the reporting, and the powerful use of \"faces\" (both real and otherwise) to tell these stories make this the clear winner. A.I.'s threat to media \u2014 from SEO and shrinking traffic and expanding disinformation to content rebels and legal implications \u2014 is thoroughly and specifically unpacked and made engaging through compelling sources and ","scores":{"Overall Score ":5}}},"hub.brown@ufl.edu":{"status":"submit","3429":{"comments":"More editorial than explanatory. Would be better without the point of view.","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}},"3537":{"comments":"Well-put-together, accessible explanation of the issues.","scores":{"Overall Score ":5}},"3597":{"comments":"Good but fairly boilerplate.","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}}},"dadamssimmons@gmail.com":{"status":"submit","3429":{"comments":"This is a revealing, deeply alarming piece of accountability journalism that exposes the shortcuts publishing companies are willing to take to replace humans with machines \u2014 and the existential threat to journalism without watchdog journalism focused on the industry itself.  Greater context about AI\u2019s role in upending journalism would\u2019ve strengthened the story. The story confirms our (journalists\u2019) worst fears about generative AI replacing actual journalists but stops at this one (very terrible) example.","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}},"3537":{"comments":"An interesting survey of AI publishing practices at several media outlets including his own,  the story lacks the depth, context and implications for a reader to develop an understanding of the complexities of generative AI for journalism and the struggle within the industry to manage\/control\/benefit from AI. At minimum, the writer could\u2019ve allowed Merrill to talk about the need for experimentation rather than throwing out quick sound bites that provide only a superficial reflection of the challenges.  Not sure how this story became a finalist.","scores":{"Overall Score ":2}},"3597":{"comments":"The NYT casts a wide net to show over multiple stories the ways in which AI is transforming the news industry as well as contributing to misinformation and disinformation. The Times gets credit for the breadth of its coverage,  but there was not a single amazing, comprehensive story that frames journalism\u2019s AI threat.","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}}}},"single_final":{"jkkaplan@syr.edu":{"status":"submit","2704":{"comments":"This is an interesting, fun-filled story though a bit self-serving: look at all these great journalists giving back. I think it misses the context of the ramifications of alll of this in terms of the next generation of journalists and what happens when these retired journalists die","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}},"2753":{"comments":"This is well-reported and well-written but unfortunately it's about a topic that I care little about and doesn't have the type of ramifications that other sstories in this category have","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}},"3491":{"comments":"I loved this story when I first read it and still love it now; it reminds me of the raid of the weekly newspaper in Kansas but this one had public officials secretly plotting to  kill journalists. Given the state of local journalism, this was fantastic reporting by a small local Oklahoma newspaper and this piece in the New Yorker expertly reported on it for a broader audience","scores":{"Overall Score ":5}},"3624":{"comments":"This was a really well-done story about an issue I didn't know had happened down in Atlanta; well-written and reported though I'm not sure I understand the clarification","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}}},"maryromano556@gmail.com":{"status":"submit","2704":{"comments":"I thoroughly enjoyed this story--and maybe this is a part of the future of journalism? Older, retired journalists helping with startups, teaching the younger generation. A good read, and analysis on the issues facing our industry, and why this could be a good option to turn the tide.","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}},"2753":{"comments":"Excellent and well reported. Story shows the difficulty of starting and managing a new media outfit. Bad management! Maybe journalists shouldn't be managers-- they should have hired an HR department, which I realize costs $$. While at first this story seemed like it would interest a slim segment of readers, it really is about the larger issue of new media, how it's managed, and how it pays writers and editors.","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}},"3491":{"comments":"Riveting read. The details and observations made this a page-turner (I even googled them for any updated news). A great example of what the loss of local journalism is costing our society.","scores":{"Overall Score ":5}},"3624":{"comments":"Interesting story; nice details but not as in-depth as the other entries.","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}}},"hpolskin@gmail.com":{"status":"submit","2704":{"comments":"Well reported and comprehensive article.  Lots of good details like the lack of diversity among the mentors, the challenges of fundraising, and the cool reception the retirees sometimes receive in a few communities.  I also liked the one-sentence lead which hooked me immediately.  Overall, it felt a bit like connect-the-dots journalism with few surprises or insights that would make this a prize-winning article.  ","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}},"2753":{"comments":"This story opened my eyes to a sector of the content industry I knew little about.  I thought that the writer framed the issue facing Autostraddle quite clearly: \"a prominent force of queer media tottering on the abyss.\" The amount of tiny details really made the piece shine such as salaries, payments to writers, etc.  A subtext of the article was the difficulties of running an indie media site.  The article could have been tighter and better organized.  ","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}},"3491":{"comments":"Some good details about the vanishing life of small town newspapering.  But the premise -- honest newspaper battling corrupt local government officials in sleepy hamlet -- felt like something I'd seen or read about many times before. The fact that local newspapers are dying and that they're needed to shine a light in dark corners of government isn't news.  ","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}},"3624":{"comments":"Solid story about business side and corporate interference with a news product, even if it's as light as Atlanta Magazine.  It's a  keyhole into the dilemma that all newsrooms face -- what words and phrases can or should be used with an eye on what might trigger stakeholders.  While I found the magazine's dilemma interesting, the piece felt a bit slight and therefore I didn't give it a 4.  ","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}}},"mchessher@mail.smu.edu":{"status":"submit","2704":{"comments":"Interesting and unexpected. I understand the reason the \"white\" piece was left for the end because of the connection to mentorship and the future, but it seemed like it deserved a bit more real estate. ","scores":{"Overall Score ":2}},"2753":{"comments":"The depth of reporting and financial data make this a standout. As does a story about an area of media that rarely earns attention. I appreciated the historical frame and the current context this publication was positioned in, and all the many voices showcased in the piece. I longed for a bit more narrative, a bit more drawing out of the main characters of this piece. But strong piece. ","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}},"3491":{"comments":"A hard-to-put-down narrative fueled by compelling characters, deep reporting, and engaging scenes. A mighty tale of the power of journalism told through the lens of a small, Southern town's newspaper. So many great details that just stick with a reader. ","scores":{"Overall Score ":5}},"3624":{"comments":"I remember the ripples this story created when it ran and the attention and interest it gathered, but, for me, it lacks the depth and the impact of some of the other pieces. ","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}}},"hub.brown@ufl.edu":{"status":"submit","2704":{"comments":"Veriy well sourced, paints a picture of a hopeful development, at least in some communities, and also touches on why it would be hard to replicate in others.","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}},"2753":{"comments":"Just too inside-baseball.","scores":{"Overall Score ":2}},"3491":{"comments":"The depth of this story was impressive. It painted  a picture of not just what is happening to local media and what is at stake when that media is lost, but the toll that accountablilty journalism can take on those who practice it.","scores":{"Overall Score ":5}},"3624":{"comments":"Could go deeper into the publisher\u2019s motivations. Somewhat superficial about the political agenda.","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}}},"dadamssimmons@gmail.com":{"status":"submit","2704":{"comments":"This is the epitome of a Mirror Awards story. The writing isn\u2019t flashy,  but the story excellently frames the re-investment of retired journalists to the profession, a major mobilization effort that has been underreported. The crisis in journalism has been well documented. This story outlines some of the solutions responding to the crisis. Retired journalists are standing in the gap as they hope to rebuild and replace local news ecosystems in communities across the country. We get to hear from them in this story. The piece highlights the accountability journalism being produced or supported by those who thought they were passing the torch to the next generation of news leaders.  The story effectively captures what\u2019s driving the movement, \u2018more fear and anxiety and deep dismay that what we devoted our lives to has been abandoned.\u2019  This is not an inside baseball story. It offers rich examples of people in local communities whose lives have been enriched or injustices addressed as a result of this retiree-led local news movement.","scores":{"Overall Score ":5}},"2753":{"comments":"Story has potential.  It does a solid job of setting up the vital role of Autostraddle for the community it serves. Thoroughly outlines the issues, but completely lacks the context of the financial challenges facing all media. The framing suggests it was written for the contractors rather than the readers served by the publication.  Lacks both nuance and maturity.  The writer pins the volatility of the organization on poor leadership without acknowledging market conditions. The organization of the story is all over the place. It jumps from finances to diversity to who knew what when to poor leadership. The essence of the story, the nutgraf, is unclear. Lots of interesting detail. The story needs a robust edit.","scores":{"Overall Score ":3}},"3491":{"comments":"A great read and a fascinating tale. Offers a compelling sense of place. Provides a deep dive of a community crisis and government corruption in narrative form.  The characters appear to be straight out of central casting. The story reads like someone from New York parachuted in to Oklahoma and wrote the story from a New York City point of view. In some places, especially near the top, the characters are almost caricature-ish.  This takes away, just a little bit, from the strength of the writing.  The story lays bare the fundamental role local news organizations play as watchdogs in local communities while highlighting the threats to public access of news and information as local news outlets shut down. ","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}},"3624":{"comments":"Wagner does an excellent job of outlining the internal crisis at Atlanta magazine complete with details and examples. She brings the reader in the room where the difficult conversations are happening and allows the reader to see how the outlet is wrestling with complex choices and questions \u2014 without pointing fingers or passing judgment. Questions about who gets to decide editorial content in this moment of deep polarization, or about corporate overreach, are rocking the news industry.  This story is deeply reflective of the intent of the Mirror Awards.","scores":{"Overall Score ":4}}}}},"submission_instructions":"<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p> <\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":4,\"className\":\"heading-display-h4\"} -->\n<h4 class=\"heading-display-h4\">Entries may be submitted in the following categories:&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/h4>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:list -->\n<ul><li>SPECIAL TOPIC CATEGORY (1) FOR 2024: Best Story on the media\u2019s coverage of artificial intelligence in journalism and the media ($1,000 prize): Up to three examples of how the media covered AI and its impact on today's journalism industry.  <\/li><li>SPECIAL TOPIC CATEGORY (2) FOR 2024: Best Story on the media\u2019s coverage of the Israeli-Hamas conflict ($1,000 prize): Up to three examples on how the media covered the conflict between Israel and Hamas.<\/li><li>Best Single Article\/Story ($1,000 prize): A single carefully researched print, digital or broadcast piece of any length focused on the media industry. May include photos, videos, sidebars, audio and\/or interactive elements, and the written piece. One article\/story may be submitted per entry.<\/li><li>Best Profile ($1,000 prize): A single carefully researched and sourced print, broadcast or digital piece covering a person or organization noteworthy in the media industry. One profile may be submitted per entry.&nbsp;<\/li><li>Best Commentary ($1,000 prize): A print, broadcast or digital piece or series of up to three pieces of commentary on the media industry demonstrating the writer\u2019s overall knowledge of the issues, analytic skills and unique voice.&nbsp;<\/li><li>John M. Higgins Award for Best In-Depth\/Enterprise Reporting ($5,000 prize): A single, in-depth investigative piece or a series of up to three pieces focused on the media industry. Print, broadcast or digital pieces may be entered, and entries may cross platforms (though not required). Entries will be judged on the quality of the reporting and the importance of the story covered.&nbsp;<\/li><\/ul>\n<!-- \/wp:list -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p><\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":4,\"className\":\"heading-display-h4\"} -->\n<h4 class=\"heading-display-h4\">Entry Guidelines<\/h4>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>All entries must be submitted between Dec. 15,&nbsp; 2023, and Feb. 15, 2024.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p> <\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->","award_error_message":"<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Something went wrong with your submission. Please contact <a href=\"mailto:mirrorawards@syr.edu\" data-type=\"mailto\" data-id=\"mailto:mirrorawards@syr.edu\">mirrorawards@syr.edu<\/a> for assistance with your entry.   <\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->","form_page_content":"<!-- wp:heading {\"className\":\"heading-display-h1\"} -->\n<h2 class=\"heading-display-h1\">2024 Mirror Awards <\/h2>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":3,\"className\":\"heading-display-h3\"} -->\n<h3 class=\"heading-display-h3\">Nomination Guidelines<\/h3>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":4,\"className\":\"heading-display-h4\"} -->\n<h4 class=\"heading-display-h4\">Overview<\/h4>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Now in their 18<sup>th <\/sup>year, the <a href=\"https:\/\/newhouse.syr.edu\/centers\/mirror-awards\/\" data-type=\"URL\" data-id=\"https:\/\/newhouse.syr.edu\/centers\/mirror-awards\/\">Mirror Awards<\/a> recognize the best reporting, analysis and commentary covering the media industry and its role in our economy, culture and democracy. Established by&nbsp;Syracuse University\u2019s S.I. Newhouse School of Public Communications in 2006, the awards honor the reporters, producers, editors and teams of writers who hold a mirror to their own industry for the public\u2019s benefit.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":4,\"className\":\"heading-display-h4\"} -->\n<h4 class=\"heading-display-h4\">Eligibility<\/h4>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>The Mirror Awards are open to anyone who conducts professional reporting, commentary or criticism of the media industry\u2014television, newspaper, magazine, radio, advertising, public relations, the internet and other forms of content-rich digital communications.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Works eligible for consideration are print, broadcast and online editorial content, including material&nbsp;published in consumer and trade magazines; local and national newspapers; local, national or syndicated&nbsp;radio and television features and programs; online local, national or syndicated radio and television features and programs; and online publications, blogs and websites. Works must have been published or&nbsp;broadcast between Jan. 1 and Dec. 31, 2023.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>The subject matter of entries should focus on the business, people, processes and regulations involved in&nbsp;the development or distribution of news and entertainment content. Television reviews, film reviews,&nbsp;fictional works and books are not eligible.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":4,\"className\":\"heading-display-h4\"} -->\n<h4 class=\"heading-display-h4\">Rules of Entry<\/h4>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph {\"align\":\"left\"} -->\n<p class=\"has-text-align-left\">Writers of any age or professional situation may enter or be nominated.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Individuals may submit up to three entries in total. If more than three entries are received, only the first three entries submitted will be accepted.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Written pieces must be submitted with a URL (where applicable) and in PDF format. Podcasts and audio or video stories must be entered with an accompanying URL.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Individuals may submit more than one entry per category. However, the same piece cannot be submitted to more than one category.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Each entry must be submitted separately.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Entries may be used in whole or in part at the awards ceremony or for event publicity. The judges\u2019 decision is final and no correspondence will be entered into.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>No awards will be given in a category if no entries are deemed worthy of citation by the judges.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>The Newhouse School will present one award for each winning entry. Additional copies of the award may be purchased.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>No one person may win in a category more than three times within a five-year period. Entries by any person who has won three times in the last five years will be excluded.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Judges reserve the right to move entries if incorrectly placed or deemed a more appropriate fit in another category.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":4,\"className\":\"heading-display-h4\"} -->\n<h4 class=\"heading-display-h4\">Judging<\/h4>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>All entries will be subject to a two-tiered judging process. The preliminary jury comprises media professionals and faculty from the Newhouse School. The top three to five entries will be forwarded to a distinguished panel of journalists and academic leaders for final judging. Care will be taken to avoid conflicts of interest.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":4,\"className\":\"heading-display-h4\"} -->\n<h4 class=\"heading-display-h4\">Evaluation Criteria<\/h4>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Entries will be evaluated based on three criteria:&nbsp;<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:list -->\n<ul><li>Excellence of craft: What is the overall quality of the writing and newsgathering that goes into each piece? This includes careful attention to sourcing.&nbsp;<\/li><li>Framing of the issue: Does the author use the story to provide a broader perspective on the media and its role in society?&nbsp;<\/li><li>Appropriateness for the intended audience: Does the author use language and examples that will make sense to their audience? It is expected, for example, that articles published for a&nbsp;trade audience will be somewhat more technical in tone than those for consumer magazines.&nbsp;<\/li><\/ul>\n<!-- \/wp:list -->\n\n<!-- wp:heading {\"level\":4,\"className\":\"heading-display-h4\"} -->\n<h4 class=\"heading-display-h4\">Announcement of Finalists and Winners&nbsp;<\/h4>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>A list of finalists in each category will be released in early spring. Winners will be announced in June.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->","submission_notification":"<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Thank you so much for submitting your entry for the Mirror Awards 2024.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>A copy of your submission has been emailed to you.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Please email mirrorawards@syr.edu with any questions or issues regarding a<br>nomination.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->","submission_disclaimer":"","prelim_jury_notes":"<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p> Scoring: 1 is the lowest 5 is the highest <\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->","final_jury_notes":""},"award_organizer":[3],"award_year":[10],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/resources.newhouse.syr.edu\/awards\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/newhouse_award\/2538"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/resources.newhouse.syr.edu\/awards\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/newhouse_award"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/resources.newhouse.syr.edu\/awards\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/newhouse_award"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/resources.newhouse.syr.edu\/awards\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2538"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"award_organizer","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/resources.newhouse.syr.edu\/awards\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/award_organizer?post=2538"},{"taxonomy":"award_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/resources.newhouse.syr.edu\/awards\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/award_year?post=2538"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}