{"id":183,"date":"2021-11-29T13:40:53","date_gmt":"2021-11-29T18:40:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/resources.newhouse.syr.edu\/awards\/?post_type=newhouse_award&#038;p=183"},"modified":"2022-02-14T17:40:19","modified_gmt":"2022-02-14T22:40:19","slug":"toner-prize-2022","status":"publish","type":"newhouse_award","link":"https:\/\/resources.newhouse.syr.edu\/awards\/awards-submission\/toner-prize-2022\/","title":{"rendered":"Toner Prize 2022"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Toner Prizes honor the legacy of the late Robin Toner, the first woman to be national political correspondent for The New York Times and a Syracuse University alumna.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":184,"template":"","meta":{"award_name":"Toner Prize 2022","award_organizer":["2"],"award_year":["7"],"award_administrator":["17"],"award_organizer_email":"cgrimes@syr.edu","award_form":["171"],"start_date":"1638363600000","end_date":"1642438740000","submission_end_date":"1642537800000","submission_reply_template":["182"],"submission_notification_template":["182"],"entry_category_key":"Toner Category","entry_filters":["News Organization","Toner Category","Reporters First Name","Reporters Last Name","Team Members"],"preliminary_judging_pools":13,"judging_preview_fields":["News Organization","Entry Title","Reporters Last Name","Reporters First Name"],"judging_full_fields":["Toner Category","News Organization","description","Paywall Username","Paywall Password","Interactive Url","Story Url 1","Story File 1","Story Url 2","Story File 2","Story Url 3","Story Url 4","Story Url 5","Story File 3","Story File 4","Story File 5","Entry Title","Reporters First Name","Reporters Last Name","Team Members","Submitter First Name","Submitter Last Name"],"judges_emails":["rebecca.blatt@asu.edu","stodghillr@missouri.edu","carrollj@umd.edu","jmmuller@usc.edu","pthomps1@olemiss.edu","rsgutter@syr.edu","jolmste@american.edu","vince.gonzales@usc.edu","clickmc@mailbox.sc.edu","mcoffee@umd.edu","abbottjm@missouri.edu","tbridis@ufl.edu","ywilson@sfsu.edu","Gary.Ghioto@unt.edu","jrosman@syr.edu","christina.leonard@asu.edu","cdrew2@lsu.edu","aegallag@syr.edu","sbedingf@umn.edu","smithms@olemiss.edu","sarah.h.cohen@asu.edu","lysak@chapman.edu","Rick.Rodriguez@asu.edu","cummingd@wlu.edu","dashiell@ohio.edu","horvitm@missouri.edu","Steve.Crane@asu.edu","jsperez@syr.edu","teri.finneman@ku.edu","judith.watson@journalism.cuny.edu","Lee.Banville@mso.umt.edu","francine@solutionsjournalism.org","chris.graves@unl.edu","seidenbe@usc.edu","J.Brown5@tcu.edu","lydiat@udel.edu","fwcurrie@syr.edu","caesara@unr.edu","ginas@uark.edu","maralee.schwartz@gmail.com","Ann.w.compton@gmail.com","treaster@miami.edu","clemetly@umich.edu","Christina.bellantoni@usc.edu","rcoope01@syr.edu","jgfobesm@syr.edu","cgrimes@syr.edu","algri100@syr.edu","tmstarme@syr.edu"],"final_judges_emails":["tmstarme@syr.edu","tmstarme@syr.edu","maralee.schwartz@gmail.com","maralee.schwartz@gmail.com","ann.w.compton@gmail.com","ann.w.compton@gmail.com","treaster@miami.edu","treaster@miami.edu","clemetly@umich.edu","clemetly@umich.edu","christina.bellantoni@usc.edu","christina.bellantoni@usc.edu","mlodato@syr.edu","mlodato@syr.edu"],"judging_criteria":[{"label":"Overall Score","description":"0 is ineligible 5 is the highest","scale":5}],"final_judging_criteria":[],"vote_submission_template":["984"],"judging":{"jury1":{"entries":["677","417","870","857","745","660","596","545","470","410","314"],"judges":["rebecca.blatt@asu.edu","stodghillr@missouri.edu","carrollj@umd.edu","tmstarme@syr.edu"]},"jury2":{"entries":["691","665","679","770","845","830","721","654","415","349","271"],"judges":["rsgutter@syr.edu","jmmuller@usc.edu","pthomps1@olemiss.edu"]},"jury3":{"entries":["615","709","869","777","702","636","520","447","406","394","379"],"judges":["jolmste@american.edu","vince.gonzales@usc.edu","clickmc@mailbox.sc.edu"]},"jury4":{"entries":["289","451","307","868","794","492","466","414","393","387"],"judges":["mcoffee@umd.edu","tbridis@ufl.edu","abbottjm@missouri.edu"]},"jury5":{"entries":["771","501","440","692","750","557","456","454","382","285"],"judges":["ywilson@sfsu.edu","Gary.Ghioto@unt.edu","jrosman@syr.edu"]},"jury6":{"entries":["495","355","698","800","767","732","662","441","419","701"],"judges":["christina.leonard@asu.edu","cdrew2@lsu.edu","aegallag@syr.edu"]},"jury7":{"entries":["528","537","761","824","768","452","448","399","243","543"],"judges":["sbedingf@umn.edu","smithms@olemiss.edu","sarah.h.cohen@asu.edu"]},"jury8":{"entries":["551","363","319","806","788","754","616","486","453","395","333"],"judges":["lysak@chapman.edu","Rick.Rodriguez@asu.edu","cummingd@wlu.edu"]},"jury9":{"entries":["457","343","842","757","685","648","626","591","433","291","260"],"judges":["dashiell@ohio.edu","horvitm@missouri.edu","Steve.Crane@asu.edu"]},"jury10":{"entries":["519","851","844","752","739","699","671","642","622","425","378"],"judges":["jsperez@syr.edu","teri.finneman@ku.edu","judith.watson@journalism.cuny.edu"]},"jury11":{"entries":["523","630","756","283","715","578","563","437","377","282","513"],"judges":["Lee.Banville@mso.umt.edu","francine@solutionsjournalism.org","chris.graves@unl.edu"]},"jury12":{"entries":["494","531","564","590","708","836","818","496","464","368","215"],"judges":["seidenbe@usc.edu","J.Brown5@tcu.edu","lydiat@udel.edu"]},"jury13":{"entries":["584","431","782","858","812","738","507","477","463","279","235"],"judges":["fwcurrie@syr.edu","caesara@unr.edu","ginas@uark.edu","cgrimes@syr.edu","rcoope01@syr.edu","jgfobesm@syr.edu"]},"unassigned":{"entries":[],"judges":["maralee.schwartz@gmail.com","Ann.w.compton@gmail.com","treaster@miami.edu","clemetly@umich.edu","Christina.bellantoni@usc.edu","algri100@syr.edu","abbottjm@missouri.edu "]}},"final_judging":{"national":{"entries":["314","415","414","501","777","732"],"judges":["maralee.schwartz@gmail.com","treaster@miami.edu","clemetly@umich.edu","christina.bellantoni@usc.edu","tmstarme@syr.edu","mlodato@syr.edu"]},"local":{"entries":["739","782","457","528","708","437","551"],"judges":["maralee.schwartz@gmail.com","treaster@miami.edu","clemetly@umich.edu","christina.bellantoni@usc.edu","tmstarme@syr.edu","mlodato@syr.edu"]},"unassigned":{"entries":[],"judges":["ann.w.compton@gmail.com","ann.w.compton@gmail.com"]}},"mirror_judging":[],"mirror_judging_final":[],"preliminary_voting":{"jury1":{"tmstarme@syr.edu":{"314":{"comments":"","scores":[]},"410":{"comments":"","scores":[]},"417":{"comments":"(brac","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"470":{"comments":"","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"545":{"comments":"","scores":[]},"596":{"comments":"next","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"660":{"comments":"","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"677":{"comments":"the ","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"745":{"comments":"(brackets on Unscored)","scores":{"Overall Score":1}},"857":{"comments":"","scores":{"Overall Score":1}},"870":{"comments":"","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"status":"save"},"rebecca.blatt@asu.edu":{"314":{"comments":"This is a tour de force of investigative, political and breaking news reporting, exposing dynamics that were hidden in plain view during the 2020 election cycle and continue well into the future. In addition, the findings are displayed clearly and the storytelling includes rich multimedia: photo, video, audio. It is a very immersive experience with intuitive navigation and opportunities for engagement.","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"410":{"comments":"This is good reporting but does not have  a crisp focus on elections. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"417":{"comments":"Deep reporting and well written --- gives much deeper analysis of the state of election laws than I've seen.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"470":{"comments":"Meticulous research in parsing many different false or questionable claims related to elections and the January 6th breach of the U.S. Capitol. While the reporting it strong and meaningful, the storytelling is lacking. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"545":{"comments":"Solid reporting on the California recall election race.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"596":{"comments":"Well reported and well written with a quick turnaround -- gives insight into Jan 6 and also statewide politics, also serving as a great setup to the 2024 race. This is the full package - covering candidates, campaigns and elections at a high level.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"660":{"comments":"Strong investigative reporting, adding deep insight into arguably one of the most important members of Congress.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"677":{"comments":"Tenacious reporting about elections, but the tone is inflammatory rather than nuanced or empathetic. ","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"745":{"comments":"Wonderful writing and thoughtful, thorough reporting. These are among the best profiles I've read, and the journalist takes on very complex subjects. The drawback is that this is not truly campaign or election coverage. While these are political figures, the focus of the reporting is not about elections.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"857":{"comments":"Very good reporting - not exactly aligned with the mission of this contest.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"870":{"comments":"Does not focus on elections, campaigns or candidates ","scores":{"Overall Score":0}},"status":"submit"},"stodghillr@missouri.edu":{"314":{"comments":"Excellent work all around on the biggest story of the year.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"410":{"comments":"Well done. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"417":{"comments":"Impressive New Yorker deep dive, analysis and yarn. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"470":{"comments":"Solid, but narrower than riot coverage.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"545":{"comments":"Well done.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"596":{"comments":"Richly reported profile work in an important new player on national scene.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"660":{"comments":"Well done. Solid, important enterprise reporting. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"677":{"comments":"Good work, but doesn't stack up to most of the others. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"745":{"comments":"The most impressive reporting and writing of the bunch!","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"857":{"comments":"Solid but doesn't stack up to the others.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"870":{"comments":"Rich yet narrow compared to other entires.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"status":"submit"},"carrollj@umd.edu":{"314":{"comments":"This is a tour de force, with an army of reporters doing what journalists do best: putting the readers in places they never could go to tell an incredible story. Deeply researched (with footnotes!) and thoughtfully reported, the stories in this package provide an insightful and alarming profile of one of the most important events in our democracy. Personal note: I know one of the reporters who participated in this project: Carol Leonnig.","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"410":{"comments":"Impressive access to each subject in these profiles.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"417":{"comments":"An impressively researched story connects disparate dots to reveal the assault on our election system. It is a complex and sophisticated story that is written clearly. Personal note: I know Jane Mayer.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"470":{"comments":"FactCheck.org remains the gold standard for fair and accurate reporting. Each entry is a careful dissection of claims and events that have been the subjects of misinformation campaigns. Superb work.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"545":{"comments":"Solid reporting and analysis, but the competition is this category is tough.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"596":{"comments":"The stories explaining Hawley's background and rise and the man behind his success are insightful and full of surprises. The breaking story of Danforth disavowing Hawley was also quite compelling. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"660":{"comments":"A revealing dive into Joe Manchin's personal economic interests. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"677":{"comments":"Incisive, fact-based reporting here. The trip to Florida to discover the non-existent offices of the Cyber Ninjas was particularly compelling.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"745":{"comments":"These are master classes in political profile-writing.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"857":{"comments":"Good question to Putin, an excellent personal story around abortion. Other stories are rather routine.","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"870":{"comments":"It's best to avoid using family members as news sources - there are other people out there with equally compelling stories. And the profile was routine. Nothing exceptional in this package.","scores":{"Overall Score":1}},"status":"submit"}},"jury7":{"sarah.h.cohen@asu.edu":{"243":{"comments":"Important stories about political culture, but I'm not sure it's the right fit for this prize. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"399":{"comments":"This is a great story for any statehouse to undertake, and Pennsylvania makes it particularly hard. IBut I'm not sure it rose to the level of a story that could make a difference, because they didn't really show why a reader would care -- I didn't see evidence of wrongdoing, or anything that suggests problems with the legislative records. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"448":{"comments":"I have to recuse myself from this entry - Charlotte said that she would use the scores from the other two jurors, so I just put a \"3\" here as a placeholder. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"452":{"comments":"This is a great example of the power of voting and its effect on local life, as well as the expression of cultural differences. ","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"528":{"comments":"This is a remarkable story about an injustice that should not have happened. My reason for the score of three (as it is in several other entries) is that it doesn't fit the criteria of the contest very well. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"537":{"comments":"I wish the author had better outlined this story in an application letter - it left it to me to figure out what the most important revelations were. That said, the stories are an important chronicling of the abuse of power of one of the country's most powerful and high-profile governors, using public records and dogged reporting.  It's hard for me to discern which of these stories was originally from the Times Union, and which were published simultaneously or after others with the same stories.  ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"543":{"comments":"This is a great story, but not a great fit for the criteria of the Toner prize. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"761":{"comments":"The Buffalo election presented voters with an unusual and difficult choice: An unpopular long-term mayor against a democratic socialist in a relatively conservative area. Zremski's stories --  designed to uncover illuminate the newcomer -- did just that.  They lack a little depth in research and public records, which is the reason for the score. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"768":{"comments":"Although this isn't a traditional politic story, it takes on one of the toughest issues facing residents during the pandemic: The connection between crime and the failure of schools. The depth of the reporting makes it clear that this stories help readers understand their government and force the government to address them. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"824":{"comments":"This is solid political reporting, covering a wide mayoral race with a candidate that the public knew little about. It's got on-the-ground reporting along with some more in-depth public records work. The application suggests that the stories help voters handle ranked-choice voting, but there isn't much in the stories that does that. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"status":"submit"},"sbedingf@umn.edu":{"243":{"comments":"Strong sourcing and compelling storytelling brings this all-to-common horror show to life. A very close competitor for the top prize, in my mind. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"399":{"comments":"Same above. A fine piece of accountability journalism.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"448":{"comments":"A story that should be reported out in many other states that allow politicians to keep unspent campaign donations. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"452":{"comments":"Compelling long-form reporting. Welcome home, Nick Kristof.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"528":{"comments":"Powerful story that was unlikely to receive attention without the dogged reporting of these particular journalists. This sort of small-town racial injustice and discrimination is prevalent nationwide but rarely receives the journalistic attention it deserves. That is never  more true than now, when local journalism is withering. A thorough, thoughtful, well-written, and -- I believe -- an award-winning piece of journalism.\n ","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"537":{"comments":"High-level, professional journalism on an important series of stories -- but they are stories that would have received attention from other news outlets as well. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"543":{"comments":"Also a close runner-up. Deeply reported investigation into policies that contributed to the wildfire disasters in California.  ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"761":{"comments":"Excellent coverage of an interesting political story. Solid, professional journalism. But does not rise to the level of award-winning, in my mind. Not a knock, just not as revelatory at the Tennessee investigation.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"768":{"comments":"This one comes closest to matching the Tennessee story, in my view. Intelligent enterprise work that digs beneath the surface to reveal hidden impacts of the pandemic. Revelatory.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"824":{"comments":"Solid work on a heavily covered story.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"status":"submit"},"smithms@olemiss.edu":{"243":{"comments":"Interesting storytelling in this series of stories. And, I appreciated this organizations approach sharing the stories of the women's experiences. Lansing is not only the capital of Michigan but it seems to be an epicenter with an intersection for sexual misconduct intertwined with politics. Women being sexualized at their place of employment, having to deal with more pressure from work along with unwanted advances from people they call \u201cco-workers\u201d although a figurative glass ceiling already separates them -- the descriptions and frames were solid. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"399":{"comments":"While Americans were struggling to not only pay bills but to maintain their health, legislative bodies were cashing in on luxuries and non-essential pleasures seemed like a quick explanatory piece. While I appreciated the data analysis involved I didn't feel like  it rose to the level of an investigative series.  Still, this report brought to light the extreme spending of law makers and their staff, shedding light on this hidden agenda. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"448":{"comments":"Are donations actually being used correctly for election campaigns? According to this report and their analysis of the State Legislature campaign finances over the last few years, they discovered that funds are not being used properly and the expenses are not tied to their campaigns. It was a solid effort and a good service to local readers.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"452":{"comments":"This was an interesting read, but perhaps did have a broad enough scope or impact. ","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"528":{"comments":"The reporting on this campaign about the rising number of African -American children being imprisoned at a higher rate in Rutherford County was an interesting story. This story was masterful in setting the agenda for readers and helping them to think about what's impacting young children. The narrative shifted a bit when attaching this uptick in arrests to a particular re-election campaign and term of the judge was insightful.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"537":{"comments":"This entry took a holistic approach in discussing the term of Gov. Cuomo and his wronging toward the people of NY. Reporting on the cover ups and broken beginnings of Gov. Cuomo\u2019s term in NY, the stories ranged from faulty bridges to moral failures.  The in-depth reporting of these circumstances was a solid reminder of the role of state reporters in explaining simple and complex issues to the public. ","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"543":{"comments":"For a single entry, this was an important piece of work. I am not sure how they aired the hour-long piece. But it certainly brought together the facts. (I had some concerns about the language use at times, it felt at times like commentary. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"761":{"comments":"A socialist and surprise, Bernie Sanders and his impact on democracy. Running on the idea of bridging socialism and capitalism in his state, encouraging entrepreneurism and influencing the economy from individual to corporations from all fronts. From the Mayor\u2019s office to the Presidential run, keeping his values at the forefront, reform that help people.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"768":{"comments":"School is keeping Connecticut\u2019s youth from choosing crime by stealing cars. This report helps highlight the connection between school and crime in their communities. However, there were no surprises or wow factors really in this presentation. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"824":{"comments":"Good old shoe leather reporting. This reporter covered a lot of ground and followed the impact of facts on public opinion. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"status":"submit"}},"jury12":{"lydiat@udel.edu":{"215":{"comments":"impressive scope of work. good and succinct explanations of the issues and problems facing the council and the mayor.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"368":{"comments":"this is what local news should do--find out the details of local government's action, inactions and mistakes. The challenges inherent in getting information from a closed system show the doggedness of the reporter.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"464":{"comments":"fascinating story, lots of research on an interesting situation.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"494":{"comments":"good work tracking down a small thing that turned out to be a major issue. most citizens (and journalists!) often overlook the exact wording of bills and laws. great catch!","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"496":{"comments":"Accessible writing and explanation of the many issues facing voters and citizens.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"531":{"comments":"well written, explained with detail and depth the history of the man, as well as what led to his downfall.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"564":{"comments":"what a great way to question candidates and really get to the heart of what the voters want to know, and what they want officials to do when elected!","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"590":{"comments":"while not a traditional political story, the political implications of this series and the entire investigation are clear.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"708":{"comments":"Excellent  series that helps to explain where misinformation starts and spreads. by looking at a state that has seen a big swing in voters, it allows the reader to understand and have context about how people think.","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"818":{"comments":"clearly one of the top political reporters on the east coast. his depth of knowledge about jersey politics helps to make stories that are soundly sourced and explained.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"836":{"comments":"great resource for voters and residents of the area, clearly lays out issues and what people can do.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"status":"submit"},"seidenbe@usc.edu":{"215":{"comments":"The first story in this bunch about an alderwoman whose committee spent close to $200K yet only met three times during the year and did not advance any legislation or policies was good.  The story didn\u2019t reveal the genesis of the story, i.e. whether they found it by looking through records or if it was revealed by other sources. The video accompanying the post is a Q&A between an anchor and the reporter had one section where the reporter was talking about the alderwoman but it was showing video of the mayor (both of whom are Black women).  Another story was about the fact that a plan touted by the mayor to go after gang profits has stalled.  The others were fairly run-of-the-mill.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"368":{"comments":"This was a confusing set of articles, especially the first two.  They featured a lot of details, names, quotes and actions but it was presented in a roundabout way with little to no context.  The later articles dealt with allegations of a meeting on salaries that may have violated the state\u2019s open meeting law.  It was definitely important to cover these issues, but they came from an allegation made public by an official, not from any digging by the news outlet.\n","scores":{"Overall Score":1}},"464":{"comments":"I felt cheated by this story.  I thought it was going to give me insight into Kevin Greeson\u2019s evolution from a progressive Democrat to a diehard Trumper, but it only offered some surface suggestions about the economy and media consumption.  And, it ended quite abruptly.\n","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"494":{"comments":"This was a great catch by the reporters on the Enquirer.  The paper did several stories about the mistake, who was responsible and what people on both sides said about it.  However, the reporting could have and should have gone further. The reporters pointed out the difference between household and family incomes, but did not go into details on the rationale behind using household vs. family, or any outside experts to give perspective about why one should be used over the other.  I would have also liked to see whether cities of comparable size have full or part-time city councils and get an outsider\u2019s perspective on whether the charter amendment would do anything to tackle corruption.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"496":{"comments":"These are detailed and thorough reports on election races and city governance.  The reporting and writing is top-notch and quite comprehensive.  Again, as above it doesn\u2019t go toward anything innovative or new in its reporting, but they are great examples of the way politics and political power should be covered. \n","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"531":{"comments":"WBEZ\u2019s reporting on Michael Madigan features a series of stories about the end of a political era in Illinois and really across the nation.  While WBEZ is commended for keeping the story alive in its web pages, the coverage represents basic, though thorough, spot news reporting on the downfall of a politically powerful politician. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"564":{"comments":"This entry features a website that asked voters what kinds of questions they wanted a city council candidate to address. It features comments from people interviewed, some of whom are not eligible to vote.  They came up with a good list of questions to pose to the candidates and featured the candidates' answers to the questions, but most of the entry was fairly routine reporting.","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"590":{"comments":"This is a well-reported series about a rape allegation against a developer, up for appointment to the Milwaukee Police Foundation, exposed corruption and \u201cfavor-dealing\u201d within the Police Department and Fire and Police Commission whose members are appointed by the Mayor.  It\u2019s a story about power brokers and the police department and I don't know if it fits as well into the award's emphasis on political reporting on campaigns, elections or candidates. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"708":{"comments":"This is a vitally important set of stories about the GOP effort to undermine elections.  The reporting shows how Trump\u2019s voter fraud myths are playing out in Pennsylvania with a candidate for US Senate, a local township\u2019s resolution on election integrity and state efforts at voting audit and restrictive voting laws.  The reporters gather comments from conservative and moderate Republicans, Democrats and outside observers including researchers from Stanford and NYU.  This reporting shows how on a regional and local level, citizens are being duped by phony claims of election fraud that follow the national effort led by Trump.   \n","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"818":{"comments":"This is a good solid political reporting.  It does not break any new ground and is not necessarily  innovative in its coverage, but it is thorough and provides context that shows the factors at play in the recent elections in New Jersey.\n","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"836":{"comments":"There is a wide breadth of reporting, though much of it is in the spot news vein \u2013 a rally on redistricting, someone deciding not to run again, as well as practical stories about the process, i.e. here\u2019s what you need to know about the recall election.  But the site presents all of the stories in a blog type fashion, and that means there is no way for users to easily find the kind of information they are looking for.  Having sections on the side would have helped.\n","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"status":"submit"},"J.Brown5@tcu.edu":{"215":{"comments":"A good look at how Chicago works","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"368":{"comments":"Good work ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"464":{"comments":"Good work","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"494":{"comments":"Good work and good catch!","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"496":{"comments":"The depth and breadth of this entry is outstanding. The stories frame ongoing national issues through a local frame. It's clear Schwartzman works his beat. He writes with a voice of authority which isn't cluttered with bias and opinion.","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"531":{"comments":"Thoughtful look at the final day of a political boss. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"564":{"comments":"Very  helpful tool and information","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"590":{"comments":"This series lives up to the adage, \"comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable.\" Excellent reporting","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"708":{"comments":"An important explainer on a topic that will take years to fully untangle.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"818":{"comments":"A good primer on NJ politics","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"836":{"comments":"Wonderful tool for audience engagement","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"status":"submit"}},"jury2":{"jmmuller@usc.edu":{"271":{"comments":"Extraordinary reporting on the behind-the-scenes machinations and maneuverings of the Trump team leading up to the election and culminating with the January 6 insurrection. The only caveat I have about awarding this the top rating is the anonymity granted to sources in order to obtain such detail about the closed meetings at the White House. However, those officials whose actions and words were attributed by others were provided the opportunity to confirm or deny or respond, so that does help.  The sheer lunacy of some of these meetings is terrifying and will clearly be part of the historical record. This series reads like dystopian fiction.  The fact that it is reality serves as a terrifying warning about the fragility of democracy.","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"349":{"comments":"If other jurors rate this as a \"5,\" I could be persuaded to go along.  This dogged, relentless, shoe-leather reporting by Hugo Lowell at the Guardian resulted in making the connection between President Trump and the effort at overturning the results of the 2020 election at the certification on January 6th. Uncovering  at least one phone call between Trump and his political allies at the Willard Hotel, Lowell's report made it clear that Trump was no idle observer of efforts to disrupt the January 6th certification. Lowell also was the first to report on the PowerPoint prepared for the President on how to overturn the election results.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"415":{"comments":"This was originally my top choice. I could be convinced to return to that decision. Simply astounding first-hand, eyewitness reporting on the siege at the Capitol on January 6th, bolstered by the reporter's own video of the action, as he followed the insurrectionists that day. His article was rich in quotes embedded in a play-by-play that also included context from his earlier reporting on white supremacist gatherings.  I thought I had seen everything and read everything about this event - until I witnessed it from Mogelson's view and impactful reporting.\n","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"654":{"comments":"Excellent writing about everything from gerrymandering in the West to possible future presidential candidates. Does not really break new ground.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"665":{"comments":"Reporter Molly O'Toole deserves kudos for ferreting out this little-known use of the public health rule - Title 42 - and its continued use by the Biden Administration to turn back immigrants from the border,  superseding their constitutional due process protection- just as Trump did. She not only gets the details right in terms of the \"big picture,\" but her moving accounts of personal stories of those who were subjected to kidnappers and thieves (and worse)make for a compelling series.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"679":{"comments":"This deep-dive into the scandalous way politicians in the digital age can raise funds from unsuspecting online donors  checks off all the boxes (yes, intended pun) for outstanding, impactful political reporting. Backed by irrefutable data, Reporter Shane Goldmacher humanizes the issue while also providing an impressive data base of evidence. This reporting prompted the FEC to end the practice of \"prechecked boxes\" in fundraising online. Legislation banning the practice at the federal and state levels is also pending.  A public service of the highest order, especially for the senior citizens who were victimized the most. Could be a \"5\"","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"691":{"comments":"NBC news and Bellingcat have gathered an impressive amount of footage from the day of the Capitol siege. Richard Engel's narration is often overly dramatic; the tick-tock account and the video are powerful enough and do not need extra theatrics. The mini-documentary does not attempt to explore what's going on outside the capitol, in terms of the White House, Pentagon and other official sources.  In light of what we know now, that seems an oversight.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"721":{"comments":"Probing look at the radical change in the GOP, post-Trump, through an examination of key players, from local towns to swing states to MyPillow guy's influence, bordering on lunacy. Excellent reporting and writing.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"770":{"comments":"Powerful interviews, back-to-back without narration, provide a compelling witness testimony from those who worked in the capital on January 6. It does not really involve deep reporting, but it is bound to be a valuable part of the historical record.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"830":{"comments":"Terrific writing, clearly outlining the ongoing threats to voting rights and, consequently, to democracy.\nIn five articles, Russell Berman covers a wide range of important issues, from the growing importance of the role of secretaries of state, the battle over a national ID, the growing number of Trump supporters who are being elected to once-obscure posts as election inspectors, the power wielded by swing voters such as Kristen Sinema.  Very fair, in terms of politics: one piece takes on the difficulties posed to voting rights in Delaware.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"845":{"comments":"Something of a history lesson, basic reporting with no breakthrough insights.","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"status":"submit"},"pthomps1@olemiss.edu":{"271":{"comments":"Very compelling reading, but the reliance on direct quotes troubles me. The intro explained the  sourcing, but the detailed direct quotes from anonymous sources still bothered me and the explanation didn't support the writing style. ","scores":{"Overall Score":1}},"349":{"comments":"Other entries about Jan. 6 were stronger.``","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"415":{"comments":"There were a number of entries about Jan. 6, all of them very good. I thought this was the best of the ones in our jury group. Brings the reader fully into the experience. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"654":{"comments":"Good work. ","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"665":{"comments":"Very good. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"679":{"comments":"Excellent investigative reporting. ","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"691":{"comments":"Outstanding audio\/video. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"721":{"comments":"Solid but other entries were more original and compelling. ","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"770":{"comments":"Presentation of interviews was engaging. Diverse group of interviewees.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"830":{"comments":"Excellent work. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"845":{"comments":"Solid. ","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"status":"submit"},"rsgutter@syr.edu":{"271":{"comments":"Powerful.  Excellent reporting.  Entry 5 was particularly gripping.  ","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"349":{"comments":"Strong coverage.  Interesting package.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"415":{"comments":"Powerful accounts of the biggest political story in decades.\n\nI know we are only supposed to give one 5.  This is a close one.  I'd be just as comfortable giving this a high score.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"654":{"comments":"Different take.","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"665":{"comments":"Some gripping stories.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"679":{"comments":"Important stories about campaign funding. Might skew a little to the left.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"691":{"comments":"Nice but not special.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"721":{"comments":"Fascinating look at the state of the Republican Party.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"770":{"comments":"Nothing special.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"830":{"comments":"Strong, well-researched, solid stories.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"845":{"comments":"Important historical perspective. Not sure it plows new ground.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"status":"submit"}},"jury6":{"aegallag@syr.edu":{"355":{"comments":"Good range of stories, though they are uneven in quality and depth. \n","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"419":{"comments":"Clear explanation of the consequences of these bills and the GOP strategy behind them. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"441":{"comments":"Well written profiles but I'm not sure they are as illuminating as some of the other entries. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"495":{"comments":"Incredible footage. Confusion and fear is palpable. Opinions also a little too palpable. ","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"662":{"comments":"Have not seen these stories nor this angle elsewhere. Narrow approach compared to other entries. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"698":{"comments":"Tapper lays it all out for the American public. Strong range of sources.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"701":{"comments":"Unique angles. Not much depth. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"732":{"comments":"These stories are critical to our democracy. The level of reporting to investigate -actual- voter fraud is painstaking and clear. The AP goes further to identify the most quotidian threats to our democracy: Who will run our elections at the local level? ","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"767":{"comments":"Love the writing. Deep reporting in this one part of Ohio. In some cases more dishy than informative. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"800":{"comments":"Coverage of candidates \/ elections is not the strong point of this entry. ","scores":{"Overall Score":1}},"status":"submit"},"christina.leonard@asu.edu":{"355":{"comments":"This series seemed the best match for the criteria. This collection hit the mark for me in these areas: \u201cilluminates the electoral process,\u201d \u201creveals the politics of policy\u201d and \u201cengages the public in democracy.\u201d These stories put events into context, offer the reader a sense of place and give us a better understanding of the players involved. The lively writing also elevated this entry to the top for me.   ","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"419":{"comments":"Deep reporting. Clear context. National breadth. These stories hit all the marks and were among the strongest in this pool.  ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"441":{"comments":"These pieces have the kind of deep reporting and context that meet the criteria for this prize. In addition, they were well written and interesting. This one would have been the top contender for me. Unfortunately, two of the stories had a corrections - so I felt I had to knock it down a point, especially since accuracy is the first criteria listed. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"495":{"comments":"MSNBC did a solid job covering the events of Jan. 6. However, this was breaking news \u2013 and as such, it offered very little context in terms of the bigger picture. ","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"662":{"comments":"Both stories were well researched (and interesting), but there wasn\u2019t as much breadth compared to the other entries. ","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"698":{"comments":"In terms of quality and production, the show is among the best. However, the Toner Prize puts a strong emphasis on fact-based reporting rather than on \u201ccommentary, opinion, polemic\u201d work. I wouldn\u2019t go so far as to say this entry is ineligible, but Jake Tapper sometimes steers into commentary by injecting his personal opinion and using loaded language.","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"701":{"comments":"This entry was good. However, it did not offer as much depth or sophistication as the other stories in the pool. ","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"732":{"comments":"The first piece - the investigative piece - was particularly impressive. The data visualization really put the reporters\u2019 findings into perspective, and it was a well-written, well-researched piece. And while the other stories in this collection were strong, they weren\u2019t necessarily standouts.  ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"767":{"comments":"These stories had some of the most lively writing in this pool. As a reader, I very much enjoyed the craft of the writing. I mean, this is one sentence: \u201cNo longer roundly welcome in his native New York and all but chased from D.C., Trump jetted toward Florida, his habitual winter weekend getaway turned paramount political stomping grounds\u2014the site of some of his biggest, most important wins; the bastion of a governor he helped get elected, two Republican senators and the House member who\u2019s maybe his most fervent minion, plus a roster of media accessories and grassroots boosters; and America\u2019s notoriously fact-flouting fantasy land, a hundred-year haven for hucksters and hustlers, outsiders, refugees and retirees, a sandy, sweaty Shangri-La of second chances, where Trump is now intent on concocting a papal-like court, a coterie of officeholders and wannabes, hangers-on and aides-de-camp, ring-kissers and the wholly beholden.\u201d But as much as I admire the writing, these read more like columns to me. And for this prize, it might veer a little too much into that arena. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"800":{"comments":"These pieces were nuanced \u2013 as described in the entry description. As much as I respect the attention to detail, I felt like these stories didn\u2019t offer as much breadth as some of the others. \n","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"status":"submit"},"cdrew2@lsu.edu":{"355":{"comments":"Very good, especially in coverage of Latinos & Trump. Probably my No. 3 or 4 pick along with the Politico entry and after the AP and the WP entries.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"419":{"comments":"Excellent, but the AP was a little quicker on some stories, and the AP's push to assess all the fraudulent ballots set the AP apart from the NYT","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"441":{"comments":"My 2nd choice overall, and I would agree to it being the winner from this group if that is the consensus.  It's deeply and richly reported, and I favor it over the Politico entry mainly in that the WP delved into more important figures--Josh Hawley, Elise Stefanik, McConnell & Tucker Carlson--and found new information and insights that really helped readers understand their transformations and what is going on inside the GOP.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"495":{"comments":"Mainly breaking coverage that day","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"662":{"comments":"Good but limited scope","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"698":{"comments":"Very interesting compilation","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"701":{"comments":"Good but not the scope of other entries","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"732":{"comments":"My top pick in a group filled with great entries because of the AP's extraordinary efforts to examine all the fraudulent ballots in the swing states so that readers could see for themselves how little validity there Trump's claims that gave rise to Jan. 6 & fueled the radicalization of the GOP that so many of these contest entries explore. The AP also was able to bring that news to the heartland in ways that the NYT and WP could not, and the AP also wrote some of the other stories in its entry, like the ones on Black churches & attacks on local election officials, a little earlier than the NYT got to those topics.","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"767":{"comments":"Great digging and fascinating revelations about Marjorie Taylor Green & Max Miller. Probably my No. 3 pick behind AP and WP entries with the Boston Globe a possible No. 3, too.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"800":{"comments":"Good but not the topic for his year","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"status":"submit"}},"jury8":{"lysak@chapman.edu":{"319":{"comments":"Thorough accounting of Cuomo story, including new details of the former governor's unsuccessful scramble to keep his job.  Solid reporting.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"333":{"comments":"Excellent watchdog journalism; debunking election conspiracy theories and misinformation. Outstanding reporting. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"363":{"comments":"This entry provides interesting, fact-focused ,historical background on several relevant local and national issues.  Well-researched.","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"395":{"comments":"A good range of stories and good focus on the impact of policy.   ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"453":{"comments":"Enlightening nd rich reporting, explaining how  the media and the Democratic Party have gotten it very wrong when it comes to the Tejano communities in South Texas.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"486":{"comments":"Excellent work holding mayor's office accountable for lost text messages and lack of transparency. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"551":{"comments":"Truly impressive and inspiring.  This is political and investigative journalism at its best.  Solid,  detailed reporting. The writing style is engaging; you can't stop reading.","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"616":{"comments":"High marks for clarity and presentation  but this series doesn't offer much re: how voters are directly impacted; what state issues are overlooked or underfunded? There was only a passing reference to this but series would be stronger if more time was spent on making that connection.","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"754":{"comments":"This is an account of what the author describes as a personal conflict\/clash; no reporting.  Details lacking.","scores":{"Overall Score":0}},"788":{"comments":"Engaging writing is backed up by solid research and reporting.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"806":{"comments":"Through compelling fact-based reporting, the writer successfully highlights how entrenched New York state leaders, and state and local policies, often do a disservice to the state's most vulnerable populations.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"status":"submit"},"cummingd@wlu.edu":{"319":{"comments":"Five-parts that form a straight narrative of events leading to Gov. Cuomo's fall. Engaging story well told but no original insights or deep digging.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"333":{"comments":"AZ Mirror is an independent online nonprofit news site launched in 2016 by a foundation with hidden money sources. Seems like diligent work, but sloppy writing. For example, the lede sentence in the first entry is hard to untangle.","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"363":{"comments":"Four entries with explanatory reporting for disparate political subjects from history, why conspiracy theories appeal, NJ redistricting.","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"395":{"comments":"A Michigan TV news reporter who covers state politics with energy and an interest in holding officials accountable. Good work, but not a competitor here.","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"453":{"comments":"It took this Mexican-American reporter in Texas (with some first-person, but not opinion) to explain what elite political reporting couldn't --  the surprising surge in GOP support along the Rio Grand valley in the 2020 election. Well-paced, with well-drawn characters introduced, a few experts interviewed, and a lot of history about why so many \u201cHispanics\u201d in the area consider themselves \u201cwhite,\u201d but with ambivalence. It\u2019s lacking much demographic data, but readable.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"486":{"comments":"A bunch of the Seattle  mayor\u2019s text messages were missing, covering BLM protests, so she couldn\u2019t respond to FOIA requests for those messages. It doesn\u2019t seem to be deliberate, but there was some nervous delay, big costs and covering up of the mistake. This wasn\u2019t just a Times investigation \u2013 lawyers and whistleblowers were aggressively pursuing the case. But the Times stuck with it.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"551":{"comments":"This is a long-form narrative of the whole surreal carnival of the Arizona recount, driven from a distance by the Darth Vader force of former President Trump\u2019s unhinged drive for revenge and overturning of reality. In response to Trump, Arizona Republican leaders could either go along with the insanity, betraying long-time friends and raising money for something they knew was a fiction, or stick with the plain facts and get death threats, subpoenas and contempt charges that could land them in jail. This multimedia series, running for five days in November, is read well as a podcast by the two key reporters. It isn\u2019t breaking news, but it is a well-reported and well-packaged epic of a tale from a southwestern annex of the Trump asylum.","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"616":{"comments":"Not so deep, this Fox TV station looked at how many bills were introduced in the Pa Assembly and how few got passed. The problem, it finds, was lack of bipartisanship. One of the five also looked at per diem spending by Pa. legislators. ","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"754":{"comments":"A first-person blog about a former Chicago Tribune reporter\u2019s violent encounter with Mayor Rahm Emmanuel.","scores":{"Overall Score":1}},"788":{"comments":"A long-time veteran on Texas politics from the DC buro, Gillman\u2019s 5 offerings here cover Beto\u2019s \u201cHell yes\u201d on mandatory confiscation of assault rifles as big liability in run for governor, Abbott\u2019s using $250b of Biden money to build more of Trump\u2019s wall, and funny descriptions of gerrymandered new districts. Written with confidence, wit and insight.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"806":{"comments":"Strong writing, with what seems deep knowledge of history \u2013 local and biographical New York, as well as national. Two pieces were in the Voice, three in the Nation, veering on advocacy, but powerfully holding the powerful to account, especially Cuomo on Covid.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"status":"submit"},"Rick.Rodriguez@asu.edu":{"319":{"comments":"I teetered between a 3 and a 4. I thought it was very good beat reporting; perhaps a little too non-critical of the new governor. Overall, a solid job of covering a major political upheaval.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"333":{"comments":"Good beat coverage of the Arizona \"forensic audit.\" The reporter was able to break some news in the reporting and did a solid job of following the issue.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"363":{"comments":"more history than news. Really not competitive","scores":{"Overall Score":1}},"395":{"comments":"Good, solid job of following political and legislative issues. Television reporters are not often committed to this type of reporting and this journalist showed interest and knowledge of political and legislative issues.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"453":{"comments":"This is a subject I am intensely interested in and have some knowledge on the topic. The reporting was insightful, thorough and balanced. For those unfamiliar with trend and even those who were, there was much to glean and learn here. This is one that I teetered on giving a 5. Ultimately, I thought it needed more editing, perhaps less meandering in the writing to really bring home the politics of Tejanos.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"486":{"comments":"Dogged beat reporting is what impressed me here. Although the initial report here was not broken by the paper, I give credit to what the reporter did in keeping the story alive resulting in new revelations that were important to the public.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"551":{"comments":"A very good recap of the Arizona \"forensic audit.\" As someone who followed the issue fairly closely I thought some interviews, particularly with the Speaker, provided new, interesting insight into to internal conflicts among Arizona Republicans. Very good work; didn't see any smoking gun-type revelations.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"616":{"comments":"This was a good explanatory series that likely helped people not that familiar with the legislative and political process understand how things work.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"754":{"comments":"This didn't measure up.","scores":{"Overall Score":1}},"788":{"comments":"Very good, solid beat reporting on local Texas political issues. I thought the reporting should have been of interest to the Dallas audience and the writing was clear and accessible.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"806":{"comments":"I found this to be the most interesting and well-written of the entries. It definitely had a point of view, bordering on commentary, which I know is not supposed to be part of this competition. But what was different was how deeply researched and reported these were giving context to important political  and local government issues. Issues were laid out, politics were connected, facts, figures and historical context was presented. All of that led to sophisticated, nuanced stories.","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"status":"submit"}},"jury13":{"fwcurrie@syr.edu":{"235":{"comments":"Typo in the sub headline \"St. Louis didn't seen a single...\"  (I assume the reporter didn\u2019t write it)  Some solid reporting on the failure of the civilian oversight board to encourage police reform. Sourcing felt a bit one-sided. Story focused blame on police but overlooked what many critics call inexperience and  dysfunction in the circuit attorney\u2019s office.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"279":{"comments":"Informative article on an issue rarely discussed: the complexities of identifying as an Arab-American from North Africa --the politics of someone neither Black nor Hispanic, but a person of color running for Boston mayor.  Just one story.","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"431":{"comments":"Solid and compelling investigative series on a massive Ohio corruption scandal & the politics of a billion dollar bailout bill.  However, the subject matter doesn\u2019t showcase the electoral process or focus on coverage of candidates, campaigns or elections.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"463":{"comments":"Since Matt is a broadcast reporter,  I was expecting some video storytelling to accompany online web versions of the TV stories.  The articles are well-sourced, but read more like brief day-of turns on a developing story. Several glaring typos in the copy.","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"477":{"comments":"Insightful, original grassroots reporting on Virginia\u2019s ever-changing political landscape\u2026in the run-up to the 2021elections. Well-sourced and engaging personal candidate profiles on  1) two African American women running for governor who grew up on opposite sides of the tracks in PetersburgVa & and (2) the pro-Trump conservative  statehouse candidate in Stuart,Va trying to unseat the GOP encumbent.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"507":{"comments":"Rock solid fact-based reporting on the politics of voting in a state where often a few hundred votes decide an election when millions of Floridians  cast ballots. A diverse cross-section of well-sourced political stories about voter demographics, attitudes & trends influenced by Jan. 6th, the pandemic & a GOP governor  trying to pave his way to the White House. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"584":{"comments":"Some good original reporting on the desperation attempts by some Wisconsin GOP leaders to overturn votes for Biden.  Despite getting little cooperation from republican state lawmakers, reporters did well in detailing pro-Trump strategies for nullifying the election with false claims of fraud & unfounded conspiracies.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"738":{"comments":"Informative podcast series on critical issues surrounding the mandated once-per-decade redistricting of North Carolina's political boundaries. However, this 2-hour-length radio entry does not quite fit the Toner Award criteria  of political reporting on  a campaign or the candidates in a race.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"782":{"comments":"Excellent, elegantly-written profiles detailing mayoral candidates of color woven with the major issues facing Boston neighborhoods in a racially polarized environment. The four entries and interactive map adhere closely to Toner Award criteria for outstanding political journalism. \n","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"812":{"comments":"Solid and fair in-depth look at NY State climate policies. The stories shine a light on New York style politics behind state climate\/energy policy, but the subject treatment does not by definition \"illuminate the electoral process or focus on the coverage of candidates.\"\n\n","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"858":{"comments":"Comprehensive, fact-based job unraveling the nuts & bolts of California's gubernatorial recall process... explaining the political dynamics of the race...and illustrating reactions to Newsom's handling of the state's economy and his missteps during the pandemic via up-close voter thumbnails.  \n\n","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"status":"submit"},"caesara@unr.edu":{"235":{"comments":"Terrific perspective, insight on emergence of St. Louis area activists and political forces in the wake of Michael Brown's death. Extensive reporting concentrated on the transformation of a former pharmacy worker who became an  influential strategist whose command of grassroots politics contributed to election of first Black female mayor in St. Louis.  (Noticed typo on subhead.)","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"279":{"comments":"Single story candidly explores public image of Arab\/Polish mayoral candidate in Boston, centered on how she self-identifies and the varying ways she is perceived by others.\n","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"431":{"comments":" Cleveland.com\/The Plain Dealer follows up on massive bribery scandal from previous year with more revealing accounts of how regulators, legislators and an energy corporation schemed to rig laws, bend policy, fashion lucrative contracts and tap taxpayer subsidies. The  news organization continued to break significant stories after prosecutors launched investigations.\n","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"463":{"comments":"Aggressive reporting on aftermath of 2020 voting. Coverage examines threats to local election officials,  school board recall efforts and a state  review deemed necessary by some and shady by others.  Well-framed stories, characterized by direct questions of parties involved and straightforward storytelling. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"477":{"comments":"\nWell-written sketches of Virginia politics during a major election year. Stories illuminated the role of race, provided insight into various candidates,  captured mixed views about the demise of Robert E. Lee statue, and assessed Virginia's evolving and complex political identities. ... (Two notes on perhaps the best written piece, on a Republican state House candidate. Story paid limited attention to Democrat opponent, though perhaps that candidate was reflected in overall campaign coverage not included in entry. Also, rigorous follow-up questions might have been in order after Republican candidate repeated unsubstantiated claims about tainted elections in 2020.)","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"507":{"comments":"Clearly, timely accounts of political machinery in Florida.  Solid beat coverage on  a range of topics.\n\nEntries No. 2 and No. 3 seem to be the same.\n","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"584":{"comments":"Persistent coverage  reveals conflicts of interest and suspect activities by officials and others involved in a state review into allegations of tainted election results.  Reporting focuses on a former judge leading review but who was previously part of the dubious chorus claiming 2020 election was stolen.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"738":{"comments":"Impressive series explaining how redistricting works and examining the history of allegiance to gerrymandering in North Carolina by both parties. The  self-described wonkish report dissects the political ritual of manipulating congressional and legislative districts.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"782":{"comments":"Richly reported stories on issues and candidates in a mayoral race described as the most diverse in Boston's history. Well-reported political profiles of six neighborhoods offered a vivid sense of place, history of evolving demographics and helpful analysis leading up to election. A post-election follow-up effectively retraced how eventual winner built multiple bases of support over the years.","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"812":{"comments":"Beat coverage of New York politics that examines  a mix of government accountability, environmental protections and climate change consequences. One standout story fillets Gov. Andrews Cuomo's costly and unfulfilled vanity project to mount LED light shows on state bridges.","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"858":{"comments":"Excellent explanation of the two simultaneous actions involved in recall elections: Yes\/no vote on recall; selection of replacement government, just in case. Effective reporting on the meager origins of recall campaign, Gov. Gavin Newsom's accomplishments and missteps, and astute analysis of recall politics.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"status":"submit"},"ginas@uark.edu":{"235":{"comments":"Emotional and powerful reporting, an important followup to Ferguson and the political path for those seeking police reform.","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"279":{"comments":"Important multicultural reporting.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"431":{"comments":"Complex reporting about graft in government, unraveling a complicated scheme.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"463":{"comments":"Strong reporting on the safety of election workers, with alarming audio of threats, and other trends.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"477":{"comments":"Crisp, compelling writing with rich quotes and context.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"507":{"comments":"Interesting analysis shared in a veteran voice.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"584":{"comments":"Excellent watchdog journalism. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"738":{"comments":"This should be required listening for government students across the country. A deep, deep dive into the arcane process that affects everyone.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"782":{"comments":"Fantastic profiles of Boston's female leaders. Rich in context and history.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"812":{"comments":"In-depth and complex reporting on infrastructure and the Cuomo administration. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"858":{"comments":"Strong reporting on the California political drama that captured the nation. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"status":"submit"}},"jury11":{"chris.graves@unl.edu":{"282":{"comments":"I applaud the efforts of FingerLakes1.com in its efforts to report on the Cayuga Nation and telling the stories of the Indigenous residents. However,  the coverage of the police force and related stories \u2014\u00a0while gripping \u2014\u00a0don't rise to the criteria of the Toner Prize, namely:  \"Illuminates the electoral process, with a special focus on coverage of candidates, campaigns or elections.\"","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"283":{"comments":"This story does not seem to meet the Toner criteria","scores":{"Overall Score":0}},"377":{"comments":"This is a strong entry and illuminates an important change in leadership in New York. The audio pieces were thorough. What the piece would have benefitted from, especially for its web site, is a transcript of the shows as well as an overarching written story that outlined the news and answered the what's next for voters. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"437":{"comments":"This is a stunner. The depth of reporting, the explanatory nature of the writing and the weaving of the tale, which most of America had a front-row seat to, is impeccable. This entry ticks all the boxes for the Toner Prize. Not only does it unravel the events from the 2020 election \u2014 setting the stage for January 6 \u2014 it does so understandably and with so many supporting elements (video, audio, documents, key players, bios). \nBravo to the AJC staff on this. Bravo. ","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"513":{"comments":"Every news outlet should have a reporter like Ovetta Wiggins. The breadth and depth of this body of work is to be lauded. Her writing is crisp, clear and effective. Her ability to connect with subjects is just as impressive. \nThe reason I could not award this a 5 is based on the Toner criteria; notably: \"Illuminates the electoral process, with a special focus on coverage of candidates, campaigns or elections.\"\n","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"523":{"comments":"I really enjoyed this piece and it is an incredible body of watchdog and revelatory work. I did not award it the highest score because of the call this year to honor Robin Toner by giving special emphasis to illuminating the electoral process, with a special focus on coverage of candidates,\ncampaigns or elections. While Newsom was the subject of a recall election, I did not see evidence this series of stories were tied to that process.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"563":{"comments":"It sure doesn't get more local than this and what a great and informative guide for the residents of Santa Cruz County.  This guide is a tremendous public service and certainly \"engages the public in democracy.\"  However, it doesn't go much further to win the Toner Prize. To wit: \"Illuminates the electoral process, with a special focus on coverage of candidates, campaigns or elections; or Reveals the politics of policy.\"  The addition of an election guide or here's how to find my polling place and\/or with a fill-out your ballot that included stories or Q&As with the candidates\" would have really completed the package. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"578":{"comments":"Craig Gilbert knows his politics (national and state) and these pieces certainly demonstrate his command of  that knowledge. If I didn't understand Wisconsin's politics, I came a lot closer after reading these pieces. Each analysis is  deep in context and data. Bravo to him  the JS for doing that work on behalf of the readers there. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"630":{"comments":"The deep dive in divisive politics at this level offers an up-close look at the changing nature of the political spectrum and allegiances and alliances. I enjoyed meeting people via on-the-ground reporting, which is right inline with the Toner Prize. However, at times  I found the pieces moving into a bit of analysis and that was off-putting. \n(I am not a fan of using first person in such stories, for example: But when I question this optimism, Christie practically pops the party\u2019s own bubble.)","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"715":{"comments":"This is a strong entry and a stellar example of hard, deep reporting that shines a light on the underbelly of a candidate \u2014 which ultimately, it appears led to him withdrawing. The team should be proud of this work.  I am not sure, however, that it reaches to \u201creveals the politics of policy or \u201cIlluminates the electoral process,\u201d per the Toner criteria. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"756":{"comments":"The provided URLs do not seem to match the provided description. ","scores":{"Overall Score":0}},"status":"submit"},"Lee.Banville@mso.umt.edu":{"282":{"comments":"This series does the hard work of covering indigenous communities and the balance of trying to force transparency while also respecting the tribe. Well done and thoroughly reported.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"283":{"comments":"Such an important and solid local piece of journalism. Although it was swamped by better resourced series in this competition, Gibson is to be commended for her work covering an important discussion with tact and with a lack of sensationalism.","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"377":{"comments":"Well reported breaking news story. Does what you expect from an experienced political reporter when the day's news breaks like a tidal wave.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"437":{"comments":"The AJC team's work on this critical story is the best of political reporting. It was in the national spotlight, but the paper's digital stories kept themselves anchored in the workings of state government, the arguments of state officials and a multimedia approach that offered the news consumer an array of ways to dissect this critically important story. Well done.","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"513":{"comments":"Highlights the importance of having state house reporters who truly know their beat and the key players. Wiggins produced a mix of important and effective stories.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"523":{"comments":"A well-researched take on how money finds its way into the political process in often unexpected ways and how donors may seek to influence policy after the money has flowed. Good use of data and detail to not make too sweeping a generalization but still raise important questions around transparency and accountability.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"563":{"comments":"Santa Cruz local is to be applauded for lifting the veil off of local government and taking a true consumer perspective.","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"578":{"comments":"Written with a ton of experience and insight, these stories and columns mix history, politics and demographics to profile why Wisconsin remains an unpredictable electoral player. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"630":{"comments":"Really good exploration of the demise and possible resurrection of the GOP in New Jersey. With lots of sources and clear-eyed analytical writing, you really get a sense of the shifting political dynamics for Republicans in states seen as solidly Democratic.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"715":{"comments":"Handling this very personal, but politically explosive, story, the Inquirer does an excellent job staying focused on the meat of the story and not drifting into the easier he said, she said political back and forth from the campaigns. The reporting demonstrated the ability to mine court documents and official proceedings to really get at the core of the story and its effect was obvious to all monitoring national politics.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"756":{"comments":"A good dive into campaign finances and their effect on policy. ","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"status":"submit"},"francine@solutionsjournalism.org":{"282":{"comments":"Interesting story about policing and politics in the Cayuga Nation. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"283":{"comments":"The story discussed events at a council meeting related to Pride month books, but I don't really feel this is a political story that gets into any local legislation or anything like that that helps me understand the politics of that community.","scores":{"Overall Score":1}},"377":{"comments":"Interesting analysis from guest helped explain what was happening.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"437":{"comments":"This entry really helped explain Georgia's role in the insurrection. The in depth reporting, anecdotes and dialogue really kept the story moving and brought this all to life.. The timeline and piece on key players helped round out the package.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"513":{"comments":"The stories have good color, details and anecdotes to tell these tories. I thought all of the stories were going to focus on policing at first, but they all gave a glimpse into important local issues. I thought the black female lawmakers and Ocean City stories were particularly strong.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"523":{"comments":"This was a very thorough analysis and gave tremendous detail to explain what was happening and provide evidence through documents and data.  The value of this story is demonstrated by the change in state regulations. I think this was an important series of articles that readers should take time to understand. ","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"563":{"comments":"This was helpful service journalism to help residents know where to go for help in their county. It didn't really help me understand anything about local politics or elections.","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"578":{"comments":"These stories showed a thorough analysis of data about the political landscape in Wisconsin and how elections are affected by population in this \"purple state\".","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"630":{"comments":"These stories really helped me understand the tension in New Jersey between Democrats and Republicans trying to reclaim offices.  The stories had a lot of interesting quotes from sources. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"715":{"comments":"Interesting articles showing the fall of a Senate candidate because of domestic abuse accusations. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"756":{"comments":"The description of the entry and title of story do not match the links, which both went to the same story about climate bills.","scores":{"Overall Score":0}},"status":"submit"}},"jury10":{"jsperez@syr.edu":{"378":{"comments":"This isn't really reporting. Rather, it's a string of sound bites edited together. As the entry title says, it 's more an oral history than journalism.","scores":{"Overall Score":0}},"425":{"comments":"This entry is by far the best reporting of all the entries. Unfortunately, it's not really about \u201ccampaigns, candidates or elections.\u201d This instead is an investigative piece that shows the failings of the political system, but doesn\u2019t really get at why that happened. Instead, just shows the process failed.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"519":{"comments":"Generally good coverage of various aspects of the recall campaign\/election. Not really all that incisive or illuminating, but maybe that\u2019s because California politics is so predictable - Democrats rule, Republicans don\u2019t have a chance. The tenor of the stories was - these people like Newsom these people don\u2019t.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"622":{"comments":"Nice job explaining simply and clearly how census data gets turned into Congressional representation. This is the role of journalism - give the audience information it can use to better understand the political process and how it affects voters.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"642":{"comments":"This entry suffers from horse race coverage, relying on polls, political insiders and person on the street interviews. It could use more of what's in story #4, where the reporter explains the history of how we got to today's recall status.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"671":{"comments":"There were lots of good angles here but the reporting fell back on similar techniques - either talking to a bunch of political playmakers to get their opinions or heading out into communities to get person on the street interviews. It feels like horse race coverage rather than research and background that helps the readers decide.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"699":{"comments":"Good reporting by attempting to talk to a lot of people and organizations. In the end, a lot of it was \u201cdid not respond,\u201d so the story feels a little empty.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"739":{"comments":"This entry fulfills the requirements of focusing on \u201ccampaigns, candidates or elections.\u201d Moreover, it does a better job of presenting facts that let the readers learn about the historical trajectory of the issues and their affect on present-day politics. Other entries relied more on opinions from political playmakers; this one let the audience decide for itself.","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"752":{"comments":"The one story is fine, but that's not up to par with other entries that had multiple entries and continuing coverage.","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"844":{"comments":"The focus of trying to explain the voting problems is a good one,  but the explanation just didn't get there - still confused. The gotcha piece about the signatures is fine, but why not ask the politician if he minds following the rules. The issue isn't whether signatures match, it's whether the solution is onerous.","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"851":{"comments":"This is so biased against one side, you\u2019d never know this was true: For about a hundred years, from after Reconstruction until the 1990s, the Democratic Party dominated Texas politics. One story accusing Republicans of racial animus didn't even quote a Republican. That's failing Journalisim 101.","scores":{"Overall Score":1}},"status":"submit"},"teri.finneman@ku.edu":{"378":{"comments":"Excellent project. Oral history is such a terrific way to ensure small details are captured for the future. Great, captivating project.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"425":{"comments":"Truly phenomenal work whose importance cannot be overstated. Nursing homes and licensing boards are such an overlooked reporting topic even though all of the signs of trouble are there. Exceptional, meticulous reporting. Outstanding. This work truly made a difference.","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"519":{"comments":"Solid, clear writing. Great use of shoe leather to get so many sources into stories.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"622":{"comments":"Clever strategy to take advantage of podcasting to provide more in-depth explanations in focused pieces. Great use of graphics as well in the series. A much-needed project to explain the complicated process of redistricting to the public.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"642":{"comments":"Great reporting on the Utah political scene with an interesting mix of topics that are talkers to provide more context for readers.","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"671":{"comments":"Strong reporting. The series illustrates strong relationships with political sources.","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"699":{"comments":"Terrific data reporting. Campaign finance reports are too often ignored at the local level, and much more of this kind of work is needed.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"739":{"comments":"Solid state reporting. It's clear the reporter is well-versed in the beat.","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"752":{"comments":"Solid local reporting","scores":{"Overall Score":1}},"844":{"comments":"Truly phenomenal work. Just an outstanding journalist using all of the best tools to do stellar reporting: sunshine requests, meticulous sourcing, clear explanations, breakouts and subheads and timelines to help readers see data better on a critical topic surrounded by so much misinformation ... Exceptional.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"851":{"comments":"Very excellent reporting on a topic that is often invisible or confusing for the general public, yet one that has a significant impact on their lives that they don't usually realize. This project does a nice job explaining why this matters.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"status":"submit"},"judith.watson@journalism.cuny.edu":{"378":{"comments":"I don't think this qualifies as local political reporting","scores":{"Overall Score":0}},"425":{"comments":"I applaud both of these investigative pieces, and particularly applaud the results they prompted.  But I don't think they qualify as political reporting.  I hope the Arizona Republic submits both for investigative reporting competitions.","scores":{"Overall Score":0}},"519":{"comments":"This sequence is well written and organized. The paper used the recall issue as a good opportunity to look at California's political divisions. The look at the agricultural community was the most effective. But overall, I found this to be more of a statewide report than local.  ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"622":{"comments":"This was an ambitious effort to explain the many issues and challenges involved in redistricting.  Trying to do it via podcasts was particularly challenging.  I admire the effort to do this in a popular format, to reach a broader audience than print, but I did find it hard to follow the thread and come away with a clear bottom line.  The more dense a topic, the greater the need for simplified explanations.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"642":{"comments":"Romboy is a good political reporter and individually, these stories were good.  They didn't really come together as a package, but I suspect that wasn't intended.  They also were more statewide than local. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"671":{"comments":"This was a decent treatment of the recall effort, but it seemed more of a play-by-play account than a deep look at what this tells us about state politics today.  It was more a statewide than local story.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"699":{"comments":"This piece was a good look at the role and legality of PBA political activities in Suffolk County.  But it needed clearer organization (subtitles would have helped), and perhaps a look at how the PBA's influence has skewed certain outcomes.  ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"739":{"comments":"This package provides excellent insights into the shifting politics in Georgia.  Each piece was strong and the cumulative impact was clear.  Good combination of data presentations as well as on-the-ground consequences and local views.","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"752":{"comments":"This was more of a local political story than most, but it read more  like a spot story analysis than an ambitious  reporting project.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"844":{"comments":"A strong entry that took a hard look at the fraud complaints issued in the wake of Michigan's election and how they were taken seriously and then resolved.  It worked well as a package, suggesting the many ways the democratic process was challenged in the 2020 election.  I especially liked the explanation of how canvassing boards work -- very few people understand their job, and they are likely to be pivotal players in the next presidential election. Bravo.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"851":{"comments":"While the sequence of stories did not seem planned in advance as a package (there seemed to be lots of repetition), the bottom line message of how redistricting had impacted certain communities was clear.   The Tarrant County story, focusing in on one community, was the best, in my view.  Solid overall impact.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"status":"submit"}},"jury5":{"ywilson@sfsu.edu":{"285":{"comments":"Excellent reporting that helped me have a deeper understanding of why things are such a mess in D.C. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"382":{"comments":"While both packages contained information vital to the public, it does not compare to some of the other entries, in terms of depth of reporting and resources offered by others. ","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"440":{"comments":"Really informative group of stories. Well-shaped narratives help us understand how racism disenfranchised whole communities of hard-working Black families. ","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"454":{"comments":"Wow! What an astounding work of journalism. I am impressed by everything about this story. I also appreciate how the team explains to readers what they believe their research revealed: \"This is the inside story of the conspiracy to save the 2020 election, based on access to the group\u2019s inner workings, never-before-seen documents and interviews with dozens of those involved from across the political spectrum. It is the story of an unprecedented, creative and determined campaign whose success also reveals how close the nation came to disaster. \u201c Good stuff! ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"456":{"comments":"While the focus on certain school boards might seem like a local issue, this series reminds us why the issue is important to all of us everywhere, not just parents or folks mentioned in these stories.  Through these stories, I learned just how important local school politics is when it comes to implementing national policies. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"501":{"comments":"Very compelling package ... powerful. One question I have ... is ... I would have liked to hear from the two black women themselves. I realize there were other interviews, etc. that outlined what the women did ... but the story opening, written in narrative form, makes it feel like they are the ones telling us what happened. Otherwise, such a great package of stories. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"557":{"comments":"Stalwart daily news reporting gave us a better understanding of what's really going on inside the beltway. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"692":{"comments":"This hard-hitting package shined the light on an area of politics that's often ignored or misunderstood. I also believe that this coverage led to real change.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"750":{"comments":"Very interesting and thoughtful piece. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"771":{"comments":"Wow. Let me start by saying: What an amazing interactive graphic! It makes me want to learn more and more about individual members.  I think the rating tool is a good way to move this story forward. I also applaud this team for crunching the numbers and producing very helpful graphics throughout the series.  ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"status":"submit"},"jrosman@syr.edu":{"285":{"comments":"The reporting here is fine. I didn't find anything that stood out and stopped me in my tracks. It had nuggets here or there that were interesting but having been a journalist in Washington some of it sounded like beltway noise. The Harris story is a good example of that. Same for the Biden and the Romney pieces. ","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"382":{"comments":"Lisa's reporting was so important on this day that stretched the fabric of America and was the direct aftermath of a political rally. Her reporting was brave, she used the telephone in a way that served almost like a radio report and she was compelling to listen to and reported the facts as she saw them. I think they could have done more in the reporting in the days after that would have bumped the score higher but being there and putting it out is the power of broadcast news. It was a much-needed service.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"440":{"comments":"The series of stories is exceptionally well shot and produced so much so that the production values were competing with the reporting of some of the stories. There was a lot of setup time to get to the point in a few. And I thought they were nice community profiles of parts of America. There was some exploration of policy but not deep enough. I think one of the standups where the reporter put himself in the story because he went to the University of Georgia didn't sit well because the pieces lingered too long on set up I didn't think it was wise.  He didn't have the luxury and the scripting and storytelling needed better copy editing and supervision.","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"454":{"comments":"This was exhaustive reporting on peeling the curtain back and revealing what was going on behind the scenes of the 2020 election. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"456":{"comments":"The podcasts I thought were interesting to listen to and certainly are topical. I didn't feel like they advanced the ball much. ","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"501":{"comments":"The reporting by Reuters was so exceptionally well done in illuminating the electoral process and represents the whole reason and meaning of the Toner Prize. The Georgia election workers piece was painstakingly well done, well researched, and had the goods about the terror caused. The OAN investigation tying it to AT&T had the goods, reported the background and left you wanting more simply because how well done the lengthy piece was. This was reported in the spirit of the Toner Prize and Robin Toner. Serious political reporting that makes a difference. Kudos to Reuters.","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"557":{"comments":"Mr. Pager did an admirable job in reporting out stories the American public needs to read about a president in his\/her first year. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"692":{"comments":"The impact of the investigative reporting into the alleged scam PAC is what stands out. They revealed a problem DOJ rarely prosecutes, had the goods on the PAC and the reporting led to indictments. This kind of reporting is necessary in the political arena and these type of PACs are difficult to get to the bottom of what they're doing which is why I think the DOJ hasn't invested resources. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"750":{"comments":"In reading the story, I thought that you could identify any marginalized group and find a sector who voted for Donald Trump...LGBT voters for example...and explore the topic. I didn't think there was terribly too much depth to the journalism. ","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"771":{"comments":"The series was very good reporting on topics that major news organizations don't spend much time on...stock trades of congressional staffers, personal investments by lawmakers. I will say - though - parts of the reporting I felt that most Americans would read it and say \"those stocks are the biggest companies in America...everyday Americans also own them\". I understand the larger point of the reporting. I applaud their determination to uncover stories on the business beat that most publications wouldn't touch out of fear it wouldn't create clicks or buzz. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"status":"submit"},"Gary.Ghioto@unt.edu":{"285":{"comments":" Comprehensive reporting showcasing inside sources with analysis. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"382":{"comments":"Courage under fire and a cool head kept Lisa Desjardins on the front lines of a near catastrophe for the nation.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"440":{"comments":"Interesting, diverse views in accessible format.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"454":{"comments":"Powerful inside reporting on the 2020 election with a narrative flair chocked with good stuff.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"456":{"comments":"Disturbing trend showcased in the podcast with many voices across the political spectrum.","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"501":{"comments":"Hard-hitting reporting with a chilling message about the threat to US democracy.","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"557":{"comments":"Good daily coverage with focus and an analytical component.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"692":{"comments":"Important examination of political shenanigans and figures inside the dirty side of politics.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"750":{"comments":"Accessible, important journalism displaying a demographic of US society that does not receive enough media attention.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"771":{"comments":"Investigative journalism that shows the hypocrisy and recklessness of elected officials who have conveniently forgotten who they represent in Congress. Accessible writing style and attributed material.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"status":"submit"}},"jury3":{"jolmste@american.edu":{"379":{"comments":"Comprehensive coverage of the scandal that rocked New York state politics.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"394":{"comments":"A refreshing look at the impact of religious constituencies in American politics.   ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"406":{"comments":"The strongest and clearest piece was about student debt.","scores":{"Overall Score":1}},"447":{"comments":"A behind-the-curtain look at centrist democrats. ","scores":{"Overall Score":1}},"520":{"comments":"The series put human faces on the national trend of nationalization of politics. ","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"615":{"comments":"The stories by Jonathan Martin reveal the depth of his reporting sources and knowledge on a wide variety of political topics, from the top players at the national level to those elected at state levels and the topics ring true today on stories with a byline written a year ago.       \n \n","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"636":{"comments":"The series puts human faces on covid statistics and helps readers understand where public policy has run into a brick wall at the national level. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"702":{"comments":"Revealing stories from across the nation on how fear and conspiracy theories are uprooting American communities. The stories are compelling reading as they put a human face on issues that are being felt by every American. \n\n","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"709":{"comments":"An important series that illustrates the outsize impact one state has had on federal development on environmental initiatives, written in a lively and engaging way to educate readers. \n\n","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"777":{"comments":"This well-researched series provides a comprehensive and probing look into how all politics is indeed local - putting a spotlight on how vulnerable the American political system is at the grassroots level. Readers should find the threat to democracy disturbing as it\u2019s coming from within the United States political system and not from foreign players.  \n    \n","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"869":{"comments":"Gaynor shines a light on alleged torture by federal agents on migrants not usually covered by news media, from Cameroon and Uganda.  ","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"status":"submit"},"clickmc@mailbox.sc.edu":{"379":{"comments":"Good, solid audio storytelling of the investigation into Gov. Andrew Cuomo.","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"394":{"comments":"Solid reporting on the intersection of faith and politics.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"406":{"comments":"A provocative view into the political thinking of a new generation. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"447":{"comments":"Intriguing look at a new pathway for Democrats.","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"520":{"comments":"Masterful storytelling that brings home the loss of newspapers and civility in American life.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"615":{"comments":"Great nuanced political writing. You know this reporter has developed incredible sources as he crafts his stories.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"636":{"comments":"An intensive behind-the-scenes look at the pandemic and the Biden administration's effort to tame it.   ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"702":{"comments":"Compelling stories on the culture of fear and fantasy in American politics. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"709":{"comments":"Really comprehensive dive into the environmental issues that drive California's politics and climate. A massive undertaking and well done. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"777":{"comments":"This is the kind of deep, grassroots journalism that can keep you up at night. It's a ferocious quest for the truth that relies on public documents and serious interviews. Outstanding.","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"869":{"comments":"An interesting look at a serious ICE complaint but I don't see how this fits within the judging criteria. ","scores":{"Overall Score":0}},"status":"submit"},"vince.gonzales@usc.edu":{"379":{"comments":"A very nice series of radio pieces that are often slightly deeper takes on the day's news. While these are good, I didn't hear anything that was particularly award-worthy.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"394":{"comments":"I have a concern that these pieces seem to go beyond just covering \"the intersection of politics and religion\" and stray into boosterism of religion in politics. Things that might be questioned at other news organizations appear to be taken at face value in some of the articles and there are places where more context and perspective might help give a fuller picture. ","scores":{"Overall Score":1}},"406":{"comments":"I am not sure I see how these pieces are linked under the stated theme. They are good stories on interesting topics, but compared to other entries, I don't think they are award winners.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"447":{"comments":"An interesting piece with a closer look at a new development within the Democratic  Party, but not really on par with other entries.","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"520":{"comments":"As an example of national reportage, these two pieces stand out for their great writing and wonderful storytelling, but I wonder if the first piece on local newspapers meets the judging criteria? Perhaps it does under the heading \"Engages the public in democracy?\" The stronger of the two entries is the piece on Colorado (which unlike the other story does not have a personal connection to the writer), but, while both are well-written and engaging, I am not sure if they rise to the level of award-winners.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"615":{"comments":"These are deeply researched, nuanced articles on a wide-range of political figures and topics.  Some offer great insights into the background and motivations of their subjects, as well as their connection to the key issues of our day. They are not as strong, though, as some of the other entries.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"636":{"comments":"Some very nice reporting on COVID-19. Except for the first two stories, though, others tend to be deeper dives into the day's main pandemic headline. Again, the reporting is good and some of the pieces are definitely worthy of recognition, but I am not sure they are award winners.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"702":{"comments":"While I don't really see how all these articles fit together under the stated theme, there is no doubt that they are deeply researched and well written. Some of them provide great context and perspective on the influence conspiracy theories and fact-free beliefs have had on the nation's political system. For me, this entry would place third out of all the entries I looked at.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"709":{"comments":"This is a wonderful series of pieces that exposes the impact some environmental regulations and policies have on the daily lives of Californians. Extensive reporting on complicated subjects, with helpful explainers, allow for nuanced and extensive discussions of issues that normally may not get this kind of attention. This is a model for how to take complex subjects and really provide the information and perspectives citizens need. Out of all the entries I reviewed, this is clear winner to me DESPITE the fact that not all of the stories have the focus on elections, campaigns or candidates that our judging criteria calls for. This series of stories, however, does an excellent job of examining the politics of policy and impacts of elections and voter initiatives. So, this would be my top choice to be an award winner.","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"777":{"comments":"This excellent series is a deep dive into how the energy behind the Jan 6th insurrection at the U.S. Capitol has been channeled into communities across the country since that day. News items and events that would be simply examples in other articles are jumping off points for entire stories here, stories that explain how the democratic process that endured on Jan. 6th could still be undermined at the local level. This is important reporting that could help citizens understand not just the jarring events at the U.S. Capitol, but also why their state and hometown politics suddenly seem so contentious. While I think the LA Times entry is better overall, this entry is excellent and clearly speaks directly to the judging criteria, which called for a focus on campaigns, candidates and elections. If I could give this entry a 4.9, I would and it is my second choice for an award.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"869":{"comments":"An interesting story about alleged abuses by ICE officers, but the story really only details the allegations. There is no real confirmation of the abuses or the use of a particular restraint device. Beyond, some discussion of policy. I also don't see much here that matches the judging criteria so I wonder if this entry is eligible for an award.","scores":{"Overall Score":1}},"status":"submit"}},"jury9":{"horvitm@missouri.edu":{"260":{"comments":"Solid reporting, especially the piece about where the petitions were signed. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"291":{"comments":"A good lawmaker to profile, but this piece takes way too long to get going and has too many tangents. Lacks focus.","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"343":{"comments":"Pretty convoluted approach; and it isn't really on point for this contest. Some great digging though.","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"433":{"comments":"Good ethical issue but not on point for this contest.","scores":{"Overall Score":1}},"457":{"comments":"Very helpful to the public and fulfills the goal of helping involve people in Democracy. Not a lot of depth on policy, but very solid and useful.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"591":{"comments":"Interesting story and good reporting, but not really on point for this contest.","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"626":{"comments":"A good look at how special interests can delay or derail legislation. Not as on point for this contest as it could be, but very good work.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"648":{"comments":"Solid news coverage of the redistricting process and good explainers for the public.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"685":{"comments":"Solid coverage, but nothing really outstanding. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"757":{"comments":"Good on policy but not a great fit for this contest. ","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"842":{"comments":"Not really on point for this contest. One great scoop, but it mostly comes from a report they obtained.","scores":{"Overall Score":1}},"status":"submit"},"dashiell@ohio.edu":{"260":{"comments":"In-depth coverage of California's recall of Governor Gavin Newsom that included an  analyses of fundraising and petition signatures.  I found the long-form article about the transgender's distrust about Caitlyn Jenner's possible candidacy for governor particularly engaging.  This coverage was more in-depth than similar coverage in another entry.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"291":{"comments":"In-depth feature story about journalists' efforts to meet with the youngest elected member of Congress, who among those speaking in support of Trump and the rally that lead to the Jan. 6 insurrection.","scores":{"Overall Score":1}},"343":{"comments":"Impressive investigative story that traces  how the political actions of a state governor can negatively impact the state and its citizens while jumpstarting the careers of his supporters.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"433":{"comments":"This story strikes at the very heart of unbiased, independent journalism---a company's ability to highjack a newspaper's editorial page without disclosing that fact to the readers.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"457":{"comments":"Excellent use of interactive technology to educate and engage  the local communities to take a more active role in the voting process.","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"591":{"comments":"Excellent example of how consistent news coverage of an important issue can lead to action rather than avoidance.  This reporter's coverage of alleged political interference to force a hospital to treat a COVID -19 patient with ivermectin ( a drug not approved for use against the disease) resulted in a formal legislative investigation to determined what happened. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"626":{"comments":"Health care, domestic abuse and public access to police dashcam videos are all important issues that need consistent news coverage.  However, one article about each issue meets the standard for good journalism, but this entry does not reveal in-depth, investigative journalism.","scores":{"Overall Score":1}},"648":{"comments":"  Katie McKellar's series of articles help educate readers about why redistricting matters and how it can shape the outcomes of future elections. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"685":{"comments":"A collection of interesting articles about how celebrities, politics and a recall, but no clear evidence of in-depth investigative reporting.","scores":{"Overall Score":1}},"757":{"comments":"Important series on climate change and the push back from energy companies, but no sense of  in-depth, investigative reporting.  ","scores":{"Overall Score":1}},"842":{"comments":"Cannot support the newspaper assertion that its coverage during the COVID pandemic  has been \"an essential part of keeping those in power honest\"  based one story.","scores":{"Overall Score":0}},"status":"submit"},"Steve.Crane@asu.edu":{"260":{"comments":"Thorough election coverage across the board: data, politics, personalities and policy. Nice job putting a face on the voters on both sides of the issue and the people driving the campaign.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"291":{"comments":"An interesting look at a freshman congressman who quickly became a political lightning rod, in Washington and at home. Shows the reader more of the man than the soundbite, and gives a sense of how he's grappling with unfolding and, at the time, unsettled events.","scores":{"Overall Score":1}},"343":{"comments":"An exhaustive - in every sense of the word - look at the players and pressures driving some of the biggest issues in the state over the last six years. Insanely deep sourcing and virtually all on the record, even when some uncomfortable truths were spoken. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"433":{"comments":"Good job of shining the spotlight on our own business, in a way that helps readers understand the importance of transparency and independence. And balance - reporter did a good job of letting the subject speak for an defend himself.","scores":{"Overall Score":1}},"457":{"comments":"Exceedingly user-friendly. The \"Meet Your Mayor\" quiz is a brilliant way to get voters interested and involved. Clean, tight reporting aimed at voters and potential voters, not politics junkies, gives readers exactly what they need to make the process work. Very good use of data and documents, as well as human sources.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"591":{"comments":"Aggressive coverage of questionable behavior by state officials that could too easily have been brushed off. Lots of good detail, nice job explaining what could be a complicated process. ","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"626":{"comments":"Clearly and carefully explains how the process really works, lays out the players and the pressures so that the least-savvy reader can follow the breadcrumbs. Very good job getting voices to humanize what could be dry material. Balanced and non-judgmental - no one was portrayed as a good guy or a bad guy, though readers will no doubt make their own calls.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"648":{"comments":"Almost an invitation to readers to learn about - and care about - an opaque process that reporters too often assume people understand. Good follow-up on the passion at the hearings and the politics going on in the background.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"685":{"comments":"Strong on-the-ground reporting that fulfills the Toner Prize focus on coverage of candidates, campaigns and elections. Breaking news as well as step-back political pieces and coverage of personalities. Easy to read and accessible, well-sourced and documented without being weighted down. ","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"757":{"comments":"Solid look at the politics behind one of the most important policy considerations of our time, pulls back the curtain on the process for readers and voters.","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"842":{"comments":"Solid writing and reporting on one of the most important stories of the year, just enough politics without overlooking the human loss at the heart of the issue.","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"status":"submit"}},"jury4":{"abbottjm@missouri.edu":{"289":{"comments":"Definitely the most enlightening, engaging and important series within the entries, in my opinion. Well-crafted narratives with deep reporting to support them. ","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"307":{"comments":"Sturdy but not exceptional","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"387":{"comments":"Solid, important investigative reporting, but not as engaging as other entries. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"393":{"comments":"Good, solid reporting and writing but probably needs to take it up a level in terms of analysis and style.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"414":{"comments":"A richly reported, beautifully written series on the issues around social welfare and politics, with really powerful human stories at the center of it. I chose an entry that shows more breadth, but if this is the others' preference, fine with me. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"451":{"comments":"This is interesting and inventive, but not perhaps what we are looking for.","scores":{"Overall Score":1}},"466":{"comments":"Quirky writing style -- engaging on a humorous level -- but not quite at the true center of politics.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"492":{"comments":"Spectacular profile, but it doesn't seem to clearly fit the purpose of the competition --  to help promote and understanding of the political process etc.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"794":{"comments":"Digs deep into the Jan. 6 riot, but doesn't demonstrate the breadth I believe we should be looking for.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"868":{"comments":"Topics are very worthy, but the writing is lackluster.","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"status":"submit"},"mcoffee@umd.edu":{"289":{"comments":"Insightful, inspiring reporting.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"307":{"comments":"Good reporting and writing, nice job training her reporter's lens on stories that are not covered so much, but falls just shy of meeting all criteria.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"387":{"comments":"Enlightening, solid reporting. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"393":{"comments":"Good stories.  Falls shy of award criteria. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"414":{"comments":"Fantastic job of humanizing the politics of policy.  Great reporting.  Deep reporting.  Wonderful writing.","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"451":{"comments":"This felt like mockery.","scores":{"Overall Score":1}},"466":{"comments":"Insightful and analytical but does not illuminate electoral process nor engage the public in democracy ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"492":{"comments":"Beautiful story.  Memorable.  Just does not meet criteria.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"794":{"comments":"Deep, probing, solid reporting.  ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"868":{"comments":"Masterful reporting.  I wish it had come closer to satisfying more of the award's stipulations.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"status":"submit"},"tbridis@ufl.edu":{"289":{"comments":"Beautifully written piece on Jan. 20, although his description in the moment of a \"bipartisan lightness\" over Biden's inauguration turned out to be short-lived, if it ever existed. Leibovich masters the authoritative voice. His copy, from verbiage to sentence length to story structure, is lyrical. He is the stenographer of the storied political class but one who rarely seems to inform us in ways they wouldn't wish it.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"307":{"comments":"Insightful, well reported analysis of young voters and the challenges for Democrats to sustain their enthusiasm. Some of the content across her stories seemed redundant. Boston mayor's race coverage was ho-hum.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"387":{"comments":"Awesome display of accountability reporting over a branch of government rarely exposed to it, this series was remarkable for its breadth and impact after publication.","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"393":{"comments":"Credulously deferential to Bundy in his profile of the anti-government, conspiracy theorist who would become Idaho's governor, Benson displays a style of journalism \u2013 offering a platform to inarguably dangerous voices \u2013 that puts democracy at risk. His profile of Schmidt was unremarkable in advancing our understanding of this complicated figure. ","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"414":{"comments":"Artfully told reporting with real voices, helping readers decipher the complicated social safety nets offered by governments as the pandemic ravaged the U.S.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"451":{"comments":"Amateurish, dumbing down of American political journalism. She apparently performs no original reporting, just aggregates what's already been reported by genuine journalists and news organizations \u2013 without attributing her information to anyone \u2013 and prepares short clips in front of a Ring light. Her content is as substantive as cotton candy. Please do not reward this parasitic repackaging of honorable, actual work by real journalists.","scores":{"Overall Score":1}},"466":{"comments":"Vitally important topic, suffers here from laboriously bad writing.","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"492":{"comments":"Depressing but poignantly written glimpse into a family's tragedy but its nexus to politics or political journalism is insufficient.","scores":{"Overall Score":0}},"794":{"comments":"Powerful coverage of one of democracy's darkest days. Impressive reporting especially on the Boogaloo Bois. Compelling interviews with the Capitol defenders would have been stronger if they weren't all speaking on condition of anonymity. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"868":{"comments":"Intriguing reporting raising issues that not enough others are. The strength of her reporting suffers from story-telling that isn't compelling. She sews together paragraphs of facts without much concern for organization, narrative techniques, rich characters. Notably on one of her submissions, Sonya Ross, has told the story of her work for AP on Air Force One on 9\/11 a hundred times. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"status":"submit"}}},"final_voting":{"national":{"maralee.schwartz@gmail.com":{"314":{"comments":"This entry stands out in comparison to the other entries, it is so comprehensive and compelling --and produced with enormous skill. It pretty much has everything--the reporting, the writing, the photography, graphics and videos.  Jan. 6 --why it happened, how it happened, and it's impact and implications on democracy-- is the story of the year, and the Post  nailed. ","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"414":{"comments":"This is probably the most Robin Toner entry of the group, though she would focus more on political forces and implications.. As is his tradition, deParle does a great job of explaining how legislative decisions affect real people. As deeply reported and compelling. I wish he had brought in more politics. I just don't  think this is the political story of the year., but I do think is it worth considering as the honorable mention. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"415":{"comments":"brilliant writing. He brings the reader right with him.  He is a brave journalist, with amazing skills. In so me ways, the entry is a bit of an outlier.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"501":{"comments":"Despite some excellent reporting, especially the detailed story of what happened to the 2 election workers, this submission did not win me over. I found the writing flat, the structure predictable and often redundant in the other stories on intimidation.  I thought the main subject was much better covered in the pro publica entry.  The OAN piece was a good hit.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"732":{"comments":"The first part examining the fraud cases was a public service, very hard work. The rest of the pieces are not prize worthy--valuable topics, but I didn't really learn anything new, no depth, and subjects done much better by other organizations.","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"777":{"comments":"the first piece on the Bannon effect is prize winning, remarkable reporting--had material other entries only could touch on.. Terrifying on the ground explanation of what is happening to the GOP and what that means for states, and elections. The rest of the package is very good. Together they paint a deep picture of what Trump and his allies are doing to the electoral process in this country.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"status":"submit"},"clemetly@umich.edu":{"314":{"comments":"This is fantastic reporting, and the presentation is compelling. But I am unsure how to judge such a massive group effort for a prize like this. \n","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"414":{"comments":"Excellent reporting, illuminating beautifully how policy shifts make real change in the lives of Americans. \n\nThis is the sort of reporting Jason is known for. And it is the sort of reporting Robin did so well, too. \n","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"415":{"comments":"Mogelson's piece is stunning, a fabulous magazine narrative. It builds on his past reporting on these issues and creates a dramatic sense of the scale of belief in the Big Lie and its consequences. If this was a storytelling award, this would be my top pick. But for the kind of meticulous, process and policy reporting that Robin perfected, Linda So's entry for Reuters is still my top pick. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"501":{"comments":"This series is quite exceptional. The reporting is focused and meticulous. The writing is compelling, consistent and well-paced. Linda So manages a careful layering of the investigative findings while still crafting a narrative with people the reader can care about. She manages to introduce several individual characters scattered across multiple states without making the narrative feel jumbled and hard to keep track of.  There is also a sense that she worked hard to build and maintain trust with sources who shared many texts, emails, voicemails that were not shared elsewhere.\n\nWhile there are plenty of unsettling details, nothing feels overdone. She lets her reporting do the work without hyperbole. While much national reporting has focused primarily on the people harassing\/threatening\/rioting, So's reporting on the lack of serious investigation by law enforcement and the tension between free-speech and legitimate threats makes this series stand out. \n\nMy only small note\/question regarding this entry is that there is a correction on the sidebar in the first story : \n\nEditor\u2019s note: This sidebar story has been corrected to remove a reference to Delaware as the only state where the chief election official is not called the secretary of state. There are 10 states where the top election official has a different title.\n\nHow do corrections typically impact the judging? \n\nRobin almost never had corrections in her stories.\n\nThis package is still a standout for me. \n\n\n","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"732":{"comments":"And extraordinary effort. This entry makes up part of a whole with the entry from Reuters and ProPublica\/Texas Tribune. \n\nReally, any of the three could reasonably selected as winner. My pick is the Reuters entry from Linda So, because it best captures the carefully developed beat expertise and care with detail that Robin's work exemplified. \n\nI expect this may be a tough deliberation. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"777":{"comments":"Excellent series. It captures with alarming detail a coordinated takeover of the Republican party. The series is most compelling in its illustration of upheaval in districts which Trump won handily. The story of Michele Carew brings to life the strategy, tactics and stakes of the Bannon-led local takeover. \n\nI believe the Reuters series by Linda So is still my top choice, but this would be a close second. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"status":"submit"},"christina.bellantoni@usc.edu":{"status":"submit","314":{"comments":"It's a terrific layout, a semester-long college course's \nworth of information, with unbelievable multimedia and depth. It also connected the dots within government and went back far enough to show the true impact of Trump's actions in great detail. \nIt was done by a huge team, which isn't a knock, but compared with the others it just seems in a different universe. I also wonder, though, if it's actually eligible \u2014 I recall we didn't consider NYT tax returns stories.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"414":{"comments":"Deeply reported, with such a sense of place, and does exactly what we try to teach student journalists to do: Humanize.\nThis line gripped me: \n\u201cIt made me feel like I was the kind of mother I wanted to be,\u201d she said.\nThis series gives readers the sense of the scope of government policies often captured with numbers and political winners and losers. Instead, DeParle delivers richly reported stories of the people helped or hurt by government's actions, with precision and powerful examples. ","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"415":{"comments":"This work made me continually pause to catch my breath. A few times, I wanted to vomit. Mogelson takes you inside, looking over the shoulders of madmen. \n\nWhen I compare this to my top choice, the NYT series on the social safety net, I wonder if there's two categories again. Best Jan. 6 reporting (this one) and best of the bunch (NYT, for me). \n\nI keep coming back to Robin Toner, who I never had the chance to know. Thank heavens she never had to experience covering anything like the insurrection, but if she did, I imagine this is the type of work she would do, not the data investigations, not the fancy multimedia reconstruction. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"501":{"comments":"It's powerful, chilling reporting showcasing the worst of humanity and underlining a distinct threat to our democracy. The stories are deeply reported and clearly written. \nI would love to discuss if this is  really in spirit of Toner Prize \u2014\u00a0I have only had a few years doing this but it feels very different from work we've previously recognized. If it is truly in line with the prize, I could be convinced to choose this as a 5. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"732":{"comments":"This is strong investigative work and such an example of clear use of data. I didn't find it as compelling as the Reuters narratives.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"777":{"comments":"Terrific reporting in the style that ProPublica has mastered. It's a cautionary tale about how every vote matters and just how threatened local government participation is at this fraught moment in our nation. For me, it's not as strong as the Reuters work. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}}},"treaster@miami.edu":{"status":"submit","314":{"comments":"This is a powerful, comprehensive look at the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, the developments that led to it, the moments of violence, the aftermath and what might lie ahead for America and Americans.  The story shows many facets of a candidate who became a president and began trying to create a new form of government in America. It uses brilliantly all the tools of modern, digital journalism in a spectacular collaboration of reporters, editors, photographers and digital specialists. #\n\n","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"414":{"comments":"The stories by Jason DeParle are excellent explorations of government and its impact on ordinary people.  They don\u2019t seem to deal with electoral politics so much as with the consequences of election choices. They don\u2019t seem to be a perfect fit for the Toner Prize.#","scores":{"Overall Score":0}},"415":{"comments":"Luke Mogelson takes us into the mob swarming the Capitol in a gracefully and powerfully written magazine article just days after the assault. Several reporters and news organizations have looked at segments of the insurrection, its origin and its later manifestations. This is the most powerful telling of the attack on the capital.  It was a tremendous performance by one reporter. But he did not have the firepower of  the small army that the Washington Post put on its Attack story. #","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"501":{"comments":"The Reuters stories on threats against election officials showed us the depth of the crisis  in American democracy with a single theme as its vehicle.  Great opening photo by Brian Snyder. #\n\n","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"732":{"comments":"This is valuable reporting on a slice of the 2020 election story. #","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"777":{"comments":"Excellent work. It was chilling reading about the Republican precinct strategy, a plan, in Steve Bannon\u2019s words, \u201cto take this back, village by village\u2026precinct by precinct.\u201d  Here was a plan by a segment of Americans to take back an electoral system that had not been taken from them or anyone else. \nIt was an electoral system, evidence showed, that functioned as designed and fairly handled the votes that led to the victory of Joe Biden and the defeat of Donald Trump. ProPublica and the Texas Tribune reporters and editors revealed   a partisan scheme to undermine  democracy.  #\n\n","scores":{"Overall Score":3}}}},"local":{"clemetly@umich.edu":{"status":"submit","437":{"comments":"A thorough reconstruction and a good read. Much was pulled from other people's reporting and other sources. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"457":{"comments":"innovative and engaging. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"528":{"comments":"This is  a close second for me. And if the group chose this as top, I would join. Though different from the other finalists, this story is most certainly about elections, politics and policy. Local judges rarely get covered, certainly not with depth.This story illuminates how a lack of local accountability for this judge had tragic consequences for children in Rutherford County, Tennessee. I remember reading every word of this story when it came out. It is powerful and deserving of recognition. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"551":{"comments":"Excellent. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"708":{"comments":"Fascinating. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"739":{"comments":"This body of work from Greg Bluestein, more than any other entry in either category, represents the kind of focused, well-sourced, straight ahead political reporting that Robin did. Stories in this series illuminate many of the trends in other entries, without dramatic packaging and tone. Steady, excellent reporting that illuminates state and local politics. I learned importance nuance from this series that I did not from the others. This is definitely the winner in the local category for me. ","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"782":{"comments":"Really good local reporting. Some others felt like national stories, even though they were submitted for local. This is solidly local reporting, richly reported. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}}},"maralee.schwartz@gmail.com":{"status":"submit","437":{"comments":"Superior work. The epic narrative, and the embedded explanatory sidebars created a powerful portrait of the shocking events  in Georgia, and Washington as Trump obsessively pressured  to undermine the election results in the state. They combine contemporaneous reporting with information gathered after individual events and from other sources- lots of depth.","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"457":{"comments":"Kudos for this clever way to inform and engage voters. And the Adams accountability piece was well done. I think it lacks the heft of the other entries, and misses on criteria","scores":{"Overall Score":1}},"528":{"comments":"This is remarkable and important story, They did a great job pulling together so much information. But found structure and times confusing---don't know when interviews took place--were they historic material or new interviews?  As much as I admire the effort, I dont consider this political journalism.  I don't think has much to do with the Toner award criteria, not sure it is eligible.","scores":{"Overall Score":1}},"551":{"comments":"they did a heroic job pulling off this narrative with so much detail without losing the reader in the weeds, and brining into sunlight what happened  after the election. Very smart packaging.  would have liked a bit more analysis of what it means for the future, GOP politics, and the elections. Also some lessons learned.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"708":{"comments":"they explain the state of play with voting issues post Trump,  but. I did not find this a compelling entry. Depends on lots for quotes intertwined with connective explanatory material. Not a lot of depth, especially compared to the Arizona and Georgia pieces on the same subject.","scores":{"Overall Score":1}},"739":{"comments":"He is good, and these are good stories--model political reporting. I am disappointed there was not more done in the first story, maps, statistics and more explanation of the political shifts. The rest of the stories a nice job of explaining these changes in GOP politics from different aspects and from the ground. He does a lot of showing and not just telling. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"782":{"comments":"Smartly conceived series, combining neighborhoods, issues and voters into revealing stories. The piece on Wu's victory is terrific, and brings together issues and neighborhoods as well as describing her own path to victory.","scores":{"Overall Score":3}}},"treaster@miami.edu":{"status":"submit","437":{"comments":"This is a fine display of local reporting.  Georgia was one of the  centers of controversy after the 2020 presidential election . The Atlanta Journal-Constitution  reported the story in detail.  It was a news organization  providing a true service to its readers.#","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"457":{"comments":"The City delivered the campaign news for Mayor of New York and the City Council through quizzes, reader feedback and  original reporting.  It was inventive and captivating work.  It had a youthful, low-budget feel about it. I wonder what kind of impact The City is having.   #","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"528":{"comments":"These stories report on the horrendous  treatment of children by the police and an elected juvenile court judge in  Murfreesboro, Tennessee.  They are valuable public service journalism, but they are more about juvenile justice than about electoral politics. They show how voters can elect and reelect incompetent and sometimes destructive officials. That is an old story worth repeating.  \nThese stories deserve recognition. But I don't think they qualify for the Toner Prizes.  \n\n","scores":{"Overall Score":0}},"551":{"comments":"The Arizona Republic spent four months looking into Arizona's recount of the 2020 presidential votes.  It  was a commendable project, a microscopic view of the Trump movement's efforts to overturn the election results in 2020 in Arizona and to reorder the election process to their benefit. The stories were detailed and well-written but, oddly,  I found them difficult to follow.  I think some of my problem with the work was a sometimes too-tight focus and the omission of some key guide posts. I had to go to Google, for example, to find out that the recount of the Maricopa County votes cost $5.6 million - or,. another new organization said, $7 million - and that the recount work stretched over six months.  The Republic described the recount as a carnival. But I had to read elsewhere to fully grasp what the carnival was all about. #","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"708":{"comments":"These are important stories that take readers inside the sprawling, some what stumbling yet determined push by former President Trump and his supporters to undermine the American electoral process.  #","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"739":{"comments":"The transformation of Georgia pieces are very readable.  They were a good idea and they took a lot of work. But they don't feel as urgent as the Journal-Constitution's entry on the Republican efforts to undermine the presidential election. #","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"782":{"comments":"This is a group of stories in the true Robin Toner tradition.  The Boston Globe, in it's coverage of the 2020 mayoral election, wrote about campaign strategies, neighbors and issues and introduced readers to the candidates with nicely paced profiles. \nIt's reporting was detailed.  It's stories and graphics were easy to read and absorb. ","scores":{"Overall Score":5}}},"christina.bellantoni@usc.edu":{"status":"save","437":{"comments":"Yes, yes, yes. The reconstructed detail here shows just what happened, just what was at stake and is deeply contextual at a time when misinformation is rampant. I love the transparency about how the work came together and appreciate the rich and thoughtful prose. \n\nProposal: What if the AJC and Republic share this prize as two ends of the nation deeply illustrating the same issue that threatens to unravel our democracy. ","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"457":{"comments":"Superb public service journalism here. Nicely crafted, tightly written, transparent and creative in reader engagement. I really like how they used the survey data to deliver multiple platforms of information to meet the audience where they are and not presume they know best about the format. Also, they did the best with Eric Adams' lack of responses, which could not have been easy. ","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"528":{"comments":"Breathtaking reporting exposing an issue that's probably happening under the radar in many communities. \n\nTalk about impact! \n\nEarlier on Tuesday, ProPublica and Nashville Public Radio published a story about a move by some Tennessee lawmakers to remove Davenport from her post. About an hour after that story was published on ProPublica\u2019s website, Davenport, in an email sent by the county\u2019s spokesperson, announced that she will not be running for reelection this year.","scores":{"Overall Score":4}},"551":{"comments":"This reporting truly illuminates what was happening on the ground from deep inside one of the most critical states in the 2020 election. The reader is placed right in the moment with eye-popping reporting, clear and crisp writing and scene setting that makes you feel like you're reading the text messages over someone's shoulder. \n\nProposal: What if the AJC and Republic share this prize as two ends of the nation deeply illustrating the same issue that threatens to unravel our democracy. ","scores":{"Overall Score":5}},"708":{"comments":"The first story is really strong, but overall these feel more like fairly standard beat coverage to me in comparison with the others. \n\nI do like their in-article explainers on \"why we're not calling it an audit\" \u2014\u00a0that sort of thing builds trust with the audience.  ","scores":{"Overall Score":2}},"739":{"comments":"Bluestein has a knack for crisp writing and talking with the right people on the ground to strengthen his political analysis rather than a bunch of pundits. His readers are served sharp coverage that can quickly give them an understanding of the state's political landscape. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}},"782":{"comments":"I love the interactivity and think this does a great service for Globe readers, but it just doesn't compare to the work showcasing our democracy in peril. ","scores":{"Overall Score":3}}}}},"submission_instructions":"<!-- wp:heading -->\n<h2>2022 Toner Prize Entry Form<\/h2>\n<!-- \/wp:heading -->\n\n<!-- wp:image {\"id\":209,\"sizeSlug\":\"full\",\"linkDestination\":\"none\"} -->\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img src=\"https:\/\/resources.newhouse.syr.edu\/awards\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/7\/2021\/12\/robin-toner.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-209\"\/><\/figure>\n<!-- \/wp:image -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Entries for the Toner Prizes for Excellence in National or Local Political Reporting for 2021 coverage&nbsp;are now being&nbsp;accepted. Deadline for entering is Jan. 17, 2022, by 11:59 p.m.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>The Toner Prizes go to the best U.S.&nbsp;political reporting on any platform \u2013 print, broadcast or online.&nbsp;We award two Toner Prizes, one for national political reporting and one for local political reporting. Each carries a $5,000 honorarium.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Entries must be fact-based reporting, not commentary.&nbsp;Single articles or a body of work are eligible. Each entry is limited to five stories. A news organization may enter more than one reporter or team. But the same reporter or team can&nbsp;be entered&nbsp;only once.&nbsp;Reporters may enter their own work, up to five stories for the entry. A reporter can&nbsp;enter&nbsp;only&nbsp;once. There is no entry fee.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>The work must have been reported and published, posted or broadcast between Jan. 1, 2021, and Dec. 31, 2021. Books are ineligible.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>In addition to the URLs for non-interactive stories, you will need to upload PDFs for text stories. <\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>The Toner Prizes honor the legacy of the late Robin Toner, the first woman to be national political correspondent for The New York Times and a Syracuse University alumna.&nbsp;Entries will be judged on how well they reflect the high standards and depth of reporting that marked Robin Toner\u2019s work. In particular, the judges will look for how well the entries:<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:list -->\n<ul><li>Illuminate the electoral process, with a special focus on coverage of candidates, campaigns and elections;&nbsp;or<\/li><li>Reveal the politics of policy and<\/li><li>Engage the public in democracy.<\/li><\/ul>\n<!-- \/wp:list -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>For more information, contact Charlotte Grimes at&nbsp;<a href=\"mailto:cgrimes@syr.edu\">cgrimes@syr.edu<\/a>.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->","award_error_message":"<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p> Something went wrong with your submission. Please contact <a href=\"mailto:cgrimes@syr.edu\" data-type=\"mailto\" data-id=\"mailto:cgrimes@syr.edu\">cgrimes@syr.edu<\/a> for assistance with your entry.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->","form_page_content":"","submission_notification":"<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>Thank you so much for submitting your entry for the Toner Prize 2022.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>A copy of your submission has been emailed to you.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->\n\n<!-- wp:paragraph -->\n<p>On Twitter, keep up-to-date on the Toner Prize competition via the hashtag #TonerPrize, and by following the Toner Program at <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/TonerProgram\" data-type=\"URL\" data-id=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/TonerProgram\">@TonerProgram<\/a> and the Newhouse School at <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/TonerProgram\">@NewhouseSU<\/a>.<\/p>\n<!-- \/wp:paragraph -->","submission_disclaimer":"","prelim_jury_notes":"","final_jury_notes":""},"award_organizer":[2],"award_year":[7],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/resources.newhouse.syr.edu\/awards\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/newhouse_award\/183"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/resources.newhouse.syr.edu\/awards\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/newhouse_award"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/resources.newhouse.syr.edu\/awards\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/newhouse_award"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/resources.newhouse.syr.edu\/awards\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/184"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/resources.newhouse.syr.edu\/awards\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=183"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"award_organizer","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/resources.newhouse.syr.edu\/awards\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/award_organizer?post=183"},{"taxonomy":"award_year","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/resources.newhouse.syr.edu\/awards\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/award_year?post=183"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}